RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      韓國 近代建築의 保存과 活用 現況에 관한 硏究 : 國家指定 史蹟을 中心으로 = Conservation and Restoration of Modern Architecture as Cultural Properties in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8941566

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        []: 淸州大學校, 2000

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 淸州大學校 産業大學院 , 建設工學科 , 2000

      • 발행연도

        2000

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        540.000

      • 발행국(도시)

        대한민국

      • 형태사항

        vii, 144 p..

      • 소장기관
        • 단국대학교 퇴계기념도서관(중앙도서관) 소장기관정보
        • 서원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 청주대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The importance of conservation of modern architecture has been greatly increased in the present. This is because they represent a modern-period as well as they are indispensable for an understanding of the history, tradition and culture and at the same time form the base for the development and advancement for future culture.
      The national government began to designate modern buildings as Historic Sites in 1963. Current total 30 modern buildings are designated Historic Sites(29).
      However, Many modern buildings have not been well conserved, especially compared with historic buildings.
      In this study, I investigated 30 modern buildings, which is designated as Historic Sites (29), with reason and process of designation as Historic Sites by national government, and the present condition, to propose a better way of modern buildings conservation and restoration.
      The results of this study were as follows;
      1. The meaning of conservation of modern architecture should be recognized as a bridge of between the past and the present. The method of conservation of historic buildings and modern buildings should be classified.
      2. When we classify of modern architecture as cultural properties, should be confirmed of the organization. Now we are conserved of modern architecture as Historic Sites. But, it is reasonable that modern architecture should be classified as Tangible Cultural Properties as like historic buildings.
      3. It is necessary that the guideline and the grade, to be determined of modern buildings as cultural properties, In addition, legal basis for this new system should be modified.
      4. Modern buildings are closely related with the present time more than historic buildings. Because of, the government buildings and religion buildings and education buildings are having the characteristic of public institution. Also, It is necessary that method of practical use should be encouraged, for example KOREA BAND is used by museum of bank to maintain the historical identity.
      5. The investigations of each individual modern building should be carried out the whole country, and make available the national record of modern buildings for the use of experts, bodies and the public. Especially, in actually problem of conservation should be considered by the methods of recording conservation.
      번역하기

      The importance of conservation of modern architecture has been greatly increased in the present. This is because they represent a modern-period as well as they are indispensable for an understanding of the history, tradition and culture and at the sam...

      The importance of conservation of modern architecture has been greatly increased in the present. This is because they represent a modern-period as well as they are indispensable for an understanding of the history, tradition and culture and at the same time form the base for the development and advancement for future culture.
      The national government began to designate modern buildings as Historic Sites in 1963. Current total 30 modern buildings are designated Historic Sites(29).
      However, Many modern buildings have not been well conserved, especially compared with historic buildings.
      In this study, I investigated 30 modern buildings, which is designated as Historic Sites (29), with reason and process of designation as Historic Sites by national government, and the present condition, to propose a better way of modern buildings conservation and restoration.
      The results of this study were as follows;
      1. The meaning of conservation of modern architecture should be recognized as a bridge of between the past and the present. The method of conservation of historic buildings and modern buildings should be classified.
      2. When we classify of modern architecture as cultural properties, should be confirmed of the organization. Now we are conserved of modern architecture as Historic Sites. But, it is reasonable that modern architecture should be classified as Tangible Cultural Properties as like historic buildings.
      3. It is necessary that the guideline and the grade, to be determined of modern buildings as cultural properties, In addition, legal basis for this new system should be modified.
      4. Modern buildings are closely related with the present time more than historic buildings. Because of, the government buildings and religion buildings and education buildings are having the characteristic of public institution. Also, It is necessary that method of practical use should be encouraged, for example KOREA BAND is used by museum of bank to maintain the historical identity.
      5. The investigations of each individual modern building should be carried out the whole country, and make available the national record of modern buildings for the use of experts, bodies and the public. Especially, in actually problem of conservation should be considered by the methods of recording conservation.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = i
      • 1. 서론 = 1
      • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
      • 1.2 연구의 내용 및 방법 = 3
      • 1.3 연구의 대상 및 범위 = 4
      • 목차 = i
      • 1. 서론 = 1
      • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
      • 1.2 연구의 내용 및 방법 = 3
      • 1.3 연구의 대상 및 범위 = 4
      • 2. 근대건축의 보존과 활용 = 7
      • 2.1 용어 및 개념정의 = 7
      • 2.1.1 한국 근대건축사에 있어서 '근대'의 개념 = 7
      • 2.1.2 보존과 활용에 관한 용어정의 = 12
      • 2.1.3 보존과 활용의 의의 = 16
      • 2.2 근대건축의 보존과 활용 유형 = 19
      • 2.2.1 근대건축의 보호제도 = 19
      • 2.2.2 근대건축의 보존방식 = 24
      • 2.2.3 근대건축의 활용유형 = 27
      • 2.3 근대건축의 보존현황과 문제점 = 31
      • 3. 근대건축의 사적 지정경위 = 35
      • 3.1 문화재와 근대건축 = 35
      • 3.1.1 문화재의 정의와 분류 = 35
      • 2.3.2 문화재의 분류상의 근대건축 = 38
      • 2.3.1 지정문화재로서의 근대건축 = 40
      • 3.2 문화재 관련법규의 변천 = 44
      • 3.2.1 제1기 보존규칙 시기(1910∼1932년) = 45
      • 3.2.2 제2기 보존령 시기(1933∼1961년) = 48
      • 3.2.3 제3기 보호법 시기(1962∼현재) = 51
      • 3.3 근대건축의 사적지정 = 53
      • 3.3.1 독립문의 사적지정 경위 = 55
      • 3.3.2 1970년대 = 57
      • 3.3.3 1980년대 = 58
      • 3.3.4 1990년대 이후 = 63
      • 4. 사적 지정 근대건축의 특성 및 보존·활용 현황 = 65
      • 4.1 공공 및 관공서 계통의 건축 = 66
      • 4.1.1 독립문(제32호) = 67
      • 4.1.2 우정총국(제213호) = 68
      • 4.1.3 구 대한의원 본관(제248호) = 72
      • 4.1.4 운현궁(제257호) = 77
      • 4.1.5 한국은행 본관(제280호) = 79
      • 4.1.6 서울역사(제284호) = 78
      • 4.1.7 진해 우체국(제291호) = 81
      • 4.1.8 구 서울구치소(제324호) = 82
      • 4.2 외국공관 계통 건축 = 84
      • 4.2.1 구 러시아공사관(제253호) = 85
      • 4.2.2 구 벨기에공사관(제254호) = 88
      • 4.2.3 목포 시립도서관(제289호) = 91
      • 4.3 종교 계통의 건축 = 93
      • 4.3.1 약현성당(제252호) = 94
      • 4.3.2 용산신학교와 원효로성당(제255호) = 96
      • 4.3.3 정동교회(제256호) = 99
      • 4.3.4 명동성당(제258호) = 102
      • 4.3.5 인천 답동성당(제287호) = 104
      • 4.3.6 전주 전동성당(제288호) = 106
      • 4.3.7 대구 계산동성당(제290호) = 108
      • 4.3.8 화산 천주교회(제318호) = 110
      • 4.4 교육 계통의 건축 = 113
      • 4.4.1 연세대학교 스팀스관, 언더우드관, 아펜젤라관(제275, 276, 277호) = 114
      • 4.4.2 구 서울대학교 본관(제278호) = 120
      • 4.4.3 구 공업전습소 본관(제279호) = 123
      • 4.4.4 중앙고등학교 본관, 서관, 동관(제281, 283, 283호) = 125
      • 4.4.5 고려대학교 본관, 중앙도서관(제285호, 286호) = 131
      • 5. 결론 = 137
      • 참고문헌 = 139
      • ABSTRACT = 143
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼