로테러담 규칙하에서의 거증책임 = The burden of proof under the Rotterdam Rules

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Practitioners involving in the law of carriage of goods by sea are used to working with a regime based on the Hague Rules(1924) as later amended by the Hague Visby Rules(1968). Most nations have ratified this Rules and have adopted national legislation based on that regime. The legal structure of the Hague Rules is the conceptualization of the interplay as a ping-pong game created by a maritime cargo case which defines the burden of proof and the respective steps in the allocation of liability and exemption. Hamburg Rules attempts to restructure the Basic principles of the preexisting laws and jurisprudence on the liability of the carrier for maritime cargo claims. The Hamburg Rules contain clear and concise provisions on both burden of proof and allocation of liability where loss is due to a combination of causes. Rotterdam Rules article 17 expressly stipulates how the burden of proof is allocated as between cargo interests and carrier, following the rather complicated ping-pong type approach of Hague Rules, rather than the simple approach taken in the Hamburg Rules. This paper analyses Rotterdam Rules article 17 comparing with the Hague Rules and Hamburg Rules

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 해상운송규칙상의 거증책임
• Ⅲ. 로테르담 규칙의 거증책임
• Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조종주, "해상운송인책임의 문제점에 관한 비교연구-국제운송관련규칙을 중심으로-" 성균관대학교 대학원 1995

2 이시환, "로테르담 규칙상의 운송인의 책임" 한국무역상무학회 42 : 189-210, 2009

3 "로테르담 규칙, 헤이그 비스비 규칙, 함부르그 규칙"

4 淸河雅孝, "海上物品運送法の基礎理論" 中央經濟史 1990

5 池山明義, "UNCITRAL물품운송조약안 시역(상)" (200) : 2008

6 "UNCITRAL Working Group Ⅲ(transport Law), A/CN.9/WG.Ⅲ/WP.41"

7 Yvonne Baatz, "The Rotterdam Rules: A practical Annotation, informa(london)"

8 Alexander von Ziegler, "The Liability of the Contracting Carrier" 44 : 2009

9 Hooper, Chest D., "THE ROTTERDAM RULES- SIMPER THAN THEY APPEAR" 40 (40): 2009

10 E.P. Hardy Ivamy, "Payne and Ivamy's Carriage & Goods by Seas, 13th ed." Butterworths 1989

11 Gard News, "New Uncitral carriage of goods convention" 192 : 2009

12 Sturley M.F., "Modernizing and Reforming U.S. Maritime Law: The impact of the Rotterdam Rules in the United Nations" 44 : 2009

13 W. Tetley, "Marine Cargo Claims, 3rd ed" BLAIS 1989

14 R. Glenn Bouer, "Conflicting Liability Regimes : Hague-Visby v. Hamburg Rules - A Case by Case Analysis" 1993

15 John F. Wilson, "Carriage of Goods by Sea" Pitman 1988

16 Dr Regina Asariotis, "Burdon of proof and allocation of liability for loss due to a combination of causes under the new Rotterdam Rules" 14 (14): 2008