RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      현행 취업규칙 제도의 기능적 한계와 개선방안 - 주요 대법원판결의 흐름을 중심으로 - = The Current Rules of Employment System's Functional Limitations and Ways to Improve the System - Focusing on the trend in major Supreme Court rulings -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109505695

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The practical status of the “rules of employment” within the workplace varies greatly. The functions and roles of the rules of employment can vary depending on how the rules of employment are interpreted according to collective agreements and, or labor contracts. As a result, various and extensive discussions on “rules of employment” are being developed, and many meaningful and important Supreme Court rulings have been accumulated. Key issues surrounding this topic include the relationship between the rules of employment and labor contracts, the method of obtaining the collective consent on the rules of employment, the validity of unfavorable changes to the rules of employment without consent, and the Supreme Court's change in its use of the theory of rationality based on social norms. These issues have been discussed as independent topics, but it is judged that there have not been sufficient attempts to identify the nature of the rules of employment and establish it systematically. There is also a practical need to clarify the functions and roles of the rules of employment. Many employers and workers may find the existing debates on the rules of employment overly conceptual.
      This study examines the existing discussions and issues related to the rules of employment, focusing on the Supreme Court rulings, and proposes measures to improve the direction of the system of mandating the rules of employment while addressing its functional limitations. Regarding the direction or purpose of mandating the rules of employment, the excessive emphasis on the principle of equality in decision-making between labor and management is deemed inappropriate. This is because, while there are similarities in the functions and purposes of collective agreements and the rules of employment, there are also differences. The rules of employment system is essentially a system designed to collectively regulate individual labor contract relationships and can be evaluated as being positioned in the middle ground between individual labor contracts and the collective agreement framework. From this point of view, this study proposed an improvement plan for the rules of employment.
      번역하기

      The practical status of the “rules of employment” within the workplace varies greatly. The functions and roles of the rules of employment can vary depending on how the rules of employment are interpreted according to collective agreements and, or ...

      The practical status of the “rules of employment” within the workplace varies greatly. The functions and roles of the rules of employment can vary depending on how the rules of employment are interpreted according to collective agreements and, or labor contracts. As a result, various and extensive discussions on “rules of employment” are being developed, and many meaningful and important Supreme Court rulings have been accumulated. Key issues surrounding this topic include the relationship between the rules of employment and labor contracts, the method of obtaining the collective consent on the rules of employment, the validity of unfavorable changes to the rules of employment without consent, and the Supreme Court's change in its use of the theory of rationality based on social norms. These issues have been discussed as independent topics, but it is judged that there have not been sufficient attempts to identify the nature of the rules of employment and establish it systematically. There is also a practical need to clarify the functions and roles of the rules of employment. Many employers and workers may find the existing debates on the rules of employment overly conceptual.
      This study examines the existing discussions and issues related to the rules of employment, focusing on the Supreme Court rulings, and proposes measures to improve the direction of the system of mandating the rules of employment while addressing its functional limitations. Regarding the direction or purpose of mandating the rules of employment, the excessive emphasis on the principle of equality in decision-making between labor and management is deemed inappropriate. This is because, while there are similarities in the functions and purposes of collective agreements and the rules of employment, there are also differences. The rules of employment system is essentially a system designed to collectively regulate individual labor contract relationships and can be evaluated as being positioned in the middle ground between individual labor contracts and the collective agreement framework. From this point of view, this study proposed an improvement plan for the rules of employment.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼