문학과 정치의 기로 - 마오쩌둥(毛澤東) 혁명의 현실적 승리와 루쉰(魯迅) 혁명의 형이상학적 승리 = A Crossroad Between Literature and Politics

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In The New Democracy(新民主主義論), written in January 1940, Mao Zedong says, “Luxun is not only a claim to the Chinese cultural revolution, a great litterateur but also a great thinker and a great revolutionary.” It is no exaggeration to say that Mao Zedong’s expression of Lu Xun was the basic guideline for evaluating Lu Xun. This article has raised questions about the roots of the differences between Mao Zedong’s Chinese revolution and the Lu Xun‘s revolution of nationality reform, and I will discuss them through a review of the relationship between politics and literature. To this end, this paper will first examine the political nature of Lu Xun’s interpretation by Mao Zedong Next, after reviewing Mao Zedong’s and Lu Xun’s views on the relationship between literature and politics, we will discuss commonalities and differences between literature and politics.
Mao Zedong’s political revolution and Lu Xun’s literary revolution for the reconstruction of nationality primarily seeks objective and rational visualization of reality. In contrast, Mao Zedong’s intervention in reality was a political and military strategy, while Lu Xun’s intervention in reality was a literary strategy that expressed Chinese thoughts and spirit. But both are the same in that they come from objective and rational perceptions of reality and the Chinese. In other words, the visualization of Chinese reality is indispensable whether it is Mao Zedong’s revolution or Lu Xun’s revolution. This is the intersection of politics and literature. But politics seeks to maintain and unify phenomena, while literature urges social evolution to separate. In other words, the distinctive feature of literary art can be said to pioneer a new horizon of perception by continually dismantling and reconstructing the relationship between concepts and things that are fixed politically, ideologically and ideologically. Politics, on the other hand, uses, promotes, inspires and incites such literature to promote revolution and complete revolution. After the completion of the revolution, politics has no choice but to stay away from the literary arts due to its inherent nature: the maintenance of phenomena and the unification (or the maintenance of power). As such, literature and politics go a long way after the success of the revolution.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박길장, "魯迅이 살아 있다면 論斷에 관한 考察" 중국인문학회 (45) : 315-334, 2010

2 모택동, "실천론ㆍ모순론(외)" 범우사 2001

3 유재홍, "문학의 정치" 인간사랑 2011

4 현길언, "문학과 정치 이데올로기 - 동북아시아 한ㆍ중ㆍ일ㆍ북한의 정치이데올로기와 문학에 대한 연구" 한양대학교출판부 2005

5 이욱연, "모택동의 문학예술론" 논장 1989

6 모택동, "모택동선집 제2, 3권" 범우사 2002

7 루쉰전집번역위원회, "루쉰전집 제5, 6, 8, 9, 15권" 그린비 2016

8 루쉰, "거짓자유서" 그린비 2011

9 钱理群, "鲁迅与毛泽东" 2001

10 魯迅, "魯迅全集 제7권" 人民文学出版社 1998

11 周红, "被遮蔽的鲁迅形象-階级斗争话语与鲁迅的符号化" 22 (22):

12 蓝棣之, "症候式分析: 毛泽东的鲁迅论" 16 (16): 2001

13 안영선, "毛澤東과 魯迅의 관계 재검토" 한국중국어문학회 57 : 309-327, 2008

14 毛澤東, "毛澤東選集 3권" 人民文學出版社 1953

15 刘泰隆, "毛泽东的鲁迅论及其在桂林文化城的传播和发展" (1) : 1991

16 김하림, "文化大革命時期魯迅評價에 관한 硏究" 중국어문연구회 15 : 1998

17 袁盛勇, "延安时期“鲁迅传统”的形成(下)" (3) : 2004

18 李松, "契合与歧异#毛泽东的鲁迅论- 兼论毛泽东的革命现代性思想" 12 (12): 2009