'Alliance network' or 'networkization of alliance' is a newly transpired concepts after the emergence of international phenomena which cannot be explained from the perspective of conventional philosophies in international relations. It is also signigi...
'Alliance network' or 'networkization of alliance' is a newly transpired concepts after the emergence of international phenomena which cannot be explained from the perspective of conventional philosophies in international relations. It is also signigicant to note that the emergence of such transition is not isolatedly happened in a specific region, but has been witnessed in the rest of the world. Within this context, this study aims to analyze the structure and characteristics of current international alliance network, to figure out the pivotal axis in that network, to verify the contemporary scholars' international systems discussions, and to draw policy implications for Korea based on the understandings of international and regional alliance network structure.
To achieve these research purposes, this study applied the social network analysis methods, and find out the following research outcomes. First, the distribution of international alliance network at the present stage reveals to be impartial. The Lorenz Curve of the international alliance network is deviated hugely from its base-line(the Gini-Coefficient: 0.899), And in regard to Ego-network Density, the United Arab Emirates, Syrian Arab Republic, Somalia, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar boast a higher Ego-network Density, imparting they have strengths in the coordination and cooperation on managing a specific international issue.
Second, the attempt to search for principal axis in international alliance network results that those countries viewed the principal axises in the international alliance network include the United States of America, Canada, Bahamas, Russia, France, Spain when measured based on the Centrality of network. They play a role as a hub or connector in the international alliance network.
Third, this study partially reputes the existing claim of ‘international system’ by the international politics scholars. The actual international system, in terms of international alliance network, does not fulfil the criteria of Multi-polar system and contains the characteristics of Uni-polar system. This study coined a novel term to refer such system to “Multi-polarity having single relative super power.”
Fourth, this study brings about Korea's future focus on its possible strategic alliance partners in reflection of network power currently receiving attention. Consequently, Korea can expect a dramatic increase in its network power when Korea is bilaterally allied with those states positioned in the Structural-holes of international alliance network and with the countries of showing high ego-network density at regional level.