RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      On Blocking Effects in Chinese: Syntactic, Pragmatic, or Both?

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103740149

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Chinese shows an interesting phenomenon, called blocking effects, according to which, long-distance binding of a reflexive is possible only in case all antecedents agree in person. Most previous studies provide syntactic accounts of blocking effects mainly based on agreement. The purpose of this paper is to show that the nature of blocking effects is purely pragmatic. Three main pieces of evidence for the pragmatic nature of blocking effects are 1) that there exist various counter-examples to previous syntactic analyses of blocking effects, 2) that pragmatic accounts of peculiarities of ba- and bei- constructions in terms of blocking effects are superior to previous syntactic accounts, and 3) that blocking effects can be overridden by discourse contexts.
      번역하기

      Chinese shows an interesting phenomenon, called blocking effects, according to which, long-distance binding of a reflexive is possible only in case all antecedents agree in person. Most previous studies provide syntactic accounts of blocking effects m...

      Chinese shows an interesting phenomenon, called blocking effects, according to which, long-distance binding of a reflexive is possible only in case all antecedents agree in person. Most previous studies provide syntactic accounts of blocking effects mainly based on agreement. The purpose of this paper is to show that the nature of blocking effects is purely pragmatic. Three main pieces of evidence for the pragmatic nature of blocking effects are 1) that there exist various counter-examples to previous syntactic analyses of blocking effects, 2) that pragmatic accounts of peculiarities of ba- and bei- constructions in terms of blocking effects are superior to previous syntactic accounts, and 3) that blocking effects can be overridden by discourse contexts.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Wang, Li, "Zhongguo yufa lilun" Shangwu Yinshuguan 1947

      2 Sun, Chaofen, "Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese" Standford University Press 1996

      3 Pan, Haihua, "Why the blocking effect?, In Syntax and semantics, Vol. 33: long distance reflexives" Academic Press 279-316, 2001

      4 Sung, Li-May, "Universals of reflexives" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1990

      5 Wang, Mingquan, "Transitivity and the BA-Construction in Mandarin" Boston University 1987

      6 Huang, C.-T. James, "The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese, In Long distance anaphora" Cambridge UP 1991

      7 Pollard, Carl, "Syntactic and nonsyntactic constraints on long-distance reflexives, In Syntax and semantics, Vol. 33: long distance reflexives" Academic Press 317-342, 2001

      8 Ding, Picus Sizhi, "Semantic change versus categorical change: a study of the development of BA in Mandarin" 29 (29): 102-128, 2001

      9 Huang, Y. -H, "Reflexives in Chinese" 10 : 1984

      10 Arnold, Jennifer E, "Reference form and discourse patterns" Stanford University 1998

      1 Wang, Li, "Zhongguo yufa lilun" Shangwu Yinshuguan 1947

      2 Sun, Chaofen, "Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese" Standford University Press 1996

      3 Pan, Haihua, "Why the blocking effect?, In Syntax and semantics, Vol. 33: long distance reflexives" Academic Press 279-316, 2001

      4 Sung, Li-May, "Universals of reflexives" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1990

      5 Wang, Mingquan, "Transitivity and the BA-Construction in Mandarin" Boston University 1987

      6 Huang, C.-T. James, "The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese, In Long distance anaphora" Cambridge UP 1991

      7 Pollard, Carl, "Syntactic and nonsyntactic constraints on long-distance reflexives, In Syntax and semantics, Vol. 33: long distance reflexives" Academic Press 317-342, 2001

      8 Ding, Picus Sizhi, "Semantic change versus categorical change: a study of the development of BA in Mandarin" 29 (29): 102-128, 2001

      9 Huang, Y. -H, "Reflexives in Chinese" 10 : 1984

      10 Arnold, Jennifer E, "Reference form and discourse patterns" Stanford University 1998

      11 Cole, Peter, "Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives" 21 : 1-22, 1990

      12 Chiarcos, Christian, "Mental salience and grammatical form: toward a framework for salience metrics in natural language generation" University of Potsdam 2009

      13 Hashimoto, Anne Yue, "Mandarin Syntactic Structure"

      14 Cole, Peter, "Long-distance reflexives: the state of the art, In Syntax and semantics" long distance reflexives 13-57, 2001

      15 Cole, Peter, "Long distance anaphors, In an Asian perspective. In SYNCOM" Blackwell Publishers 2006

      16 Wu, Xiaochi, "Lexical mappings in the BA construction" Harvard University 1996

      17 Kim, Jong-Bok, "Korean Honorification: a kind of expressive meaning" 16 : 303-336, 2008

      18 Wu, Guo, "Information Structure in Chinese" Peking University Press 1998

      19 Cole, Peter, "Head movement and long distance reflexives" 25 : 355-406, 1990

      20 Givón, Talmy, "From discourse to syntax: grammar as a processing strategy, In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax" Academic Press 81-112, 1979

      21 Kaiser, Elsi, "Effects of topic and focus on salience" 10 : 139-154, 2006

      22 Dai, Jin-huei Enya, "Conceptualization and cognitive relativism on result in Mandarin Chinese: the case study of Mandarin Chinese ba construction using a cognitive and centering approach" Louisiana State University 2005

      23 Li, Charles N, "Co-verbs in Mandarin Chinese: verbs or prepositions?" 2 (2): 257-278, 1974

      24 Battistella, E, "Chinese reflexivization" 27 : 987-1012, 1989

      25 Li, Dianyu, "Causative and resultative constructions in Mandarin Chinese" Göteborg University 2003

      26 Cole, Peter, "Antecedents and blockers of long distance reflexives: the case of Chinese ziji" 27 : 357-390, 1996

      27 Huang, Yan, "Anaphora: a cross-linguistic approach" Oxford University Press 2000

      28 Tsao, Feng-fu, "A topic-comment approach to the ba construction" 15 (15): 1-54, 1987

      29 송홍기, "A Minimalist Analysis of Xo Reflexivization in Chinese and Korean*" 한국생성문법학회 14 (14): 375-396, 2004

      30 Chao, Yuen Ren, "A Grammar of Spoken Chinese" University of California Press 1968

      31 Hu, Jianhua, "A Comparative Study of English Reflexives and Chinese Compound Reflexive" 34 (34): 241-247, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-08-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국언어학회(대표:홍재성) -> 한국언어학회 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-08-16 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국언어학회(대표:임홍빈) -> 한국언어학회(대표:홍재성)
      영문명 : The Linguistic Society Of Korea -> The Linguistic Society of Korea
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-19 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Linguistics KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.67 0.6 1.198 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼