RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      勤勞契約의 侵害와 危險勤勞의 拒否 = The Interference with Employment Contract and an Employee's Right to Refuse a Hazardous Work Assignment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75029960

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A considerable body of law has grown up about the sulject of interference with commercial or economic relations, Included in the field of such relations are of course existing employment contracts, and agreements. It is usually said that tort liabili...

      A considerable body of law has grown up about the sulject of interference with commercial or economic relations, Included in the field of such relations are of course existing employment contracts, and agreements.
      It is usually said that tort liability may be imposed upon a defendant who intentionally and improperly interferes with the plaintiff's rights under a contract with another person if the interference causes the plintiff to lose a right under the contract or makes the contract rights more costly or less valuable.
      The Iaw of torts, and especially the Iaw of contract interference, was once of considerable significance in labor-management disputes. A Strike might interfere with the contract rights of a worker who did not wish to observe the strike.
      The most common example is the case of iniury to a person who then loses wages as a result of the injury. Recovery for lost wages is commonly permitted for negligent injury, not on the theory that there was a negligent interference with the worker's performance of his contract, but on the theory that the interference, and the wage loss, resuted from the tort to his person.
      Health and Safety factors may justify the employee in leaving his employment. Occasions might arise when an employee is confronted with a choice between not performing assigned tasks or subjecting himself to serious injury or death arising from a hazardous condition at the workplace. If the employee, with no reasonable alternative, refuses in good faith to expose himsel to the dangerous condition, he would be protecteel against subsequent discrimination. The employee should have asked his employer to correct the dangerous condition and his refusal to work must be in good faith.
      The interference with employment contract should be avoided, and the measures for protecting employees should be taken.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 目次
      • Ⅰ. 勤勞契約과 經濟關係
      • 1. 序
      • 2. 勤勞契約의 侵害
      • 3. 契約關係의 侵害
      • 目次
      • Ⅰ. 勤勞契約과 經濟關係
      • 1. 序
      • 2. 勤勞契約의 侵害
      • 3. 契約關係의 侵害
      • Ⅱ. 責任의 要件으로서의 故意
      • 1. 故意的 侵害
      • 2. 動機
      • 3. 利益
      • Ⅲ. 侵害行爲의 態樣과 因果關係
      • Ⅳ. 故意 및 過失
      • 1. 契約侵害
      • 2. 救濟
      • Ⅴ. 危險勤勞의 拒否
      • 1. 契約上 問題
      • 2. 不當解雇
      • 3. 英法上의 建設的 解止
      • 4. 正當性의 判斷
      • 5. 美國法上의 危險勤勞拒否權
      • 6. 勤勞契約侵害의 問題
      • Ⅵ. 勤勞關係侵害의 排除와 保護
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼