RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ChatGTP API 활용 인공지능 논・서술형 자동채점 프로그램 개발 실행연구 = Action Research on the Development Program of ChatGPT Automated Scoring Method Program for Essay Evaluation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109016259

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: With the rapid development of AI technology, discussions on applying AI in the field of education are ongoing. This research aims to develop a program utilizing AI for the automatic scoring of essay-type items without definite answers. Method: The research was the participatory action research method, which integrates researchers and practitioners. Participation in OpenAI-sponsored Hackathon competitions allowed for continuous improvement of the program prototype based on feedback from experts. Results: 「Evaluative AI(v1.0)」 was developed, capable of generating assessment scores and comments for essay-type answers according to user-defined rubrics. Additionally, 「Evaluative AI(v2.0)」 was developed to reflect experts’ comments at the Hackathon competition, creating ‘AI evaluation teachers’ with individual characteristics, and comparing scores with human scorers. Conclusion: Through the research, several possibilities were proposed: the ability of AI to understand evaluation rubrics and score by reflecting them, the ability to design ‘AI evaluation teachers’ similar to school teachers, the high intra-rater reliability of ‘AI evaluation teacher’; and the reduction of errors through cross-evaluating by multiple ‘AI evaluation teachers’. In addition, a couple of suggestions for the future action research were proposed: research that first train AI a large number of essay-type answers before conducting main essay evaluations, research exploring how teachers utilize AI automatic scoring programs in class, and research for developing the program prototype for coding qualitative data.
      번역하기

      Purpose: With the rapid development of AI technology, discussions on applying AI in the field of education are ongoing. This research aims to develop a program utilizing AI for the automatic scoring of essay-type items without definite answers. Method...

      Purpose: With the rapid development of AI technology, discussions on applying AI in the field of education are ongoing. This research aims to develop a program utilizing AI for the automatic scoring of essay-type items without definite answers. Method: The research was the participatory action research method, which integrates researchers and practitioners. Participation in OpenAI-sponsored Hackathon competitions allowed for continuous improvement of the program prototype based on feedback from experts. Results: 「Evaluative AI(v1.0)」 was developed, capable of generating assessment scores and comments for essay-type answers according to user-defined rubrics. Additionally, 「Evaluative AI(v2.0)」 was developed to reflect experts’ comments at the Hackathon competition, creating ‘AI evaluation teachers’ with individual characteristics, and comparing scores with human scorers. Conclusion: Through the research, several possibilities were proposed: the ability of AI to understand evaluation rubrics and score by reflecting them, the ability to design ‘AI evaluation teachers’ similar to school teachers, the high intra-rater reliability of ‘AI evaluation teacher’; and the reduction of errors through cross-evaluating by multiple ‘AI evaluation teachers’. In addition, a couple of suggestions for the future action research were proposed: research that first train AI a large number of essay-type answers before conducting main essay evaluations, research exploring how teachers utilize AI automatic scoring programs in class, and research for developing the program prototype for coding qualitative data.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼