RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    수업원리에 기초한 수업용 소프트웨어 평가준거의 개발 및 평가에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T3217291

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      부산: 동아대학교, 1995

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 동아대학교 대학원 , 교육학과 , 1995

    • 발행연도

      1995

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      373.3 판사항(3)

    • DDC

      371.39445 판사항(19)

    • 발행국(도시)

      부산

    • 형태사항

      ii,54장; 26cm

    • 소장기관
      • 강원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립순천대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립창원대학교 도서관 (창원캠퍼스) 소장기관정보
      • 동서대학교 민석도서관 소장기관정보
      • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 서원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 인제대학교 백인제기념도서관 소장기관정보
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As more computers are used in schools as instructional media, a large number of instructional softwares are being supplied by various agencies without any forms of verification on their instructional soundness. The purposes of this study were to develop criteria for instructional software evaluation and to evaluate existing instructional softwares using these criteria.
    To achieve these purposes, this study first have examined critical activities comprising an instructional process and identified instructional principles according to the types of learning outcomes as well as to the types of softwares in order to derive theoretical basis for developing criteria for instructional software evaluation. Next this study have analyzed already developed criteria for software evaluation to find out their limitations and shortcomings in terms of their instructional soundness, and have developed instructionally-sound criteria for software evaluation. Finally this study have evaluated existing softwares to disclose the degrees into which instructional principles are incorporated in the production of these softwares.
    The conclusion according to the results of this study are as follows:
    1. Existing criteria for software evaluation do not thoroughly reflect instructional principles for effective learning. Accordingly, these criteria would evaluate softwares only on a superficial level.
    2.The criteria for software evaluation developed in this study would provide meaningful and credible data for instructional decisions because they have been developed on the basis of effective instructional principles.
    3.Existing softwares are not fairly sound in terms of instructional considerations because they have pooly incorporated instructional principles.
    4.As for the types of learning outcomes intended by softwares, existing softwares to teach intellectual skills are higher in the degree of reflecting instructional principles than those to teach knowledge are. As for the types of subject matter, math is the highest and Korean language is the lowest in the degree reflecting instructional principles. As for the types of softwares, drill & practice type is the highest and game type is the lowest in the degree of reflecting instructional principles.
    번역하기

    As more computers are used in schools as instructional media, a large number of instructional softwares are being supplied by various agencies without any forms of verification on their instructional soundness. The purposes of this study were to devel...

    As more computers are used in schools as instructional media, a large number of instructional softwares are being supplied by various agencies without any forms of verification on their instructional soundness. The purposes of this study were to develop criteria for instructional software evaluation and to evaluate existing instructional softwares using these criteria.
    To achieve these purposes, this study first have examined critical activities comprising an instructional process and identified instructional principles according to the types of learning outcomes as well as to the types of softwares in order to derive theoretical basis for developing criteria for instructional software evaluation. Next this study have analyzed already developed criteria for software evaluation to find out their limitations and shortcomings in terms of their instructional soundness, and have developed instructionally-sound criteria for software evaluation. Finally this study have evaluated existing softwares to disclose the degrees into which instructional principles are incorporated in the production of these softwares.
    The conclusion according to the results of this study are as follows:
    1. Existing criteria for software evaluation do not thoroughly reflect instructional principles for effective learning. Accordingly, these criteria would evaluate softwares only on a superficial level.
    2.The criteria for software evaluation developed in this study would provide meaningful and credible data for instructional decisions because they have been developed on the basis of effective instructional principles.
    3.Existing softwares are not fairly sound in terms of instructional considerations because they have pooly incorporated instructional principles.
    4.As for the types of learning outcomes intended by softwares, existing softwares to teach intellectual skills are higher in the degree of reflecting instructional principles than those to teach knowledge are. As for the types of subject matter, math is the highest and Korean language is the lowest in the degree reflecting instructional principles. As for the types of softwares, drill & practice type is the highest and game type is the lowest in the degree of reflecting instructional principles.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 수업용 소프트웨어 평가준거 개발의 이론적 기초 = 5
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 수업용 소프트웨어 평가준거 개발의 이론적 기초 = 5
    • 1. 수업과 수업활동 = 5
    • 2. 학습성과 영역과 수업원리 = 9
    • 3. 수업용 소프트웨어의 유형 = 14
    • Ⅲ. 수업용 소프트웨어 평가준거의 개발 = 17
    • 1. 수업용 소프트웨어의 개발 절차 = 17
    • 2. 수업용 소프트웨어의 평가영역별 준거 및 평가요소와 그 근거 = 22
    • 3. 수업용 소프트웨어 평가준거 = 31
    • Ⅳ. 수업용 소프트웨어의 평가 = 35
    • 1. 평가 방법 = 35
    • 2. 평가결과 및 논의 = 37
    • Ⅴ. 결론 = 47
    • 참고문헌 = 49
    • SUMMARY = 52
    • 부록 = 54
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼