RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      배임죄의 ‘임무위배행위’ 개념 및 그 판단표지에 대한 고찰 - 배임죄의 불법론 [1] - = Consideration of the concept of “disclosure of duties” of breach crime of trust and its standard judgment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109306531

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The breach crime of trust is a crime that constitutes 'property damage (unlawful consequences)' through 'mission violation (unlawful conduct)' of the office manager.
      However, in the illegal structure, the illegality of the act of breach does not result from any form of act directly related to property interests as an object of conduct, but from the trust relationship between [other handlers] formed through office work and the 'mission' formed on the premise of the 'violation'. Therefore, it is distinguished from other property crimes (e.g., theft, robbery, fraud, blackmail, embezzlement, etc.) that derive illegality from acts directly related to property.
      Therefore, in order to limit or reduce the scope of punishment, it is necessary to clarify the punishment of the punishment that is the former system is necessary.
      In order this end, the "The trust relationship relationship between the "Live surface) and the contents of the existing trust relationship, and the contents should be established. Also, interpretation theory that clearly restrictions of "breach" is necessary to clarify the act of "the legal Decree and contract" is necessary to clarify the act of breach of breach of crime. It is also desirable from the perspective of the criminal law to clarify the nature of the breach of trust by limiting the concept of damage to 'defeat', narrowing the illegality of the breach of trust and the scope of its responsibility. Furthermore, considering that there is no illegality of outcome in the case of 'non-damage-free breach of duty' and the illegality of conduct as a property crime is faint, it is desirable to convert it into a criminal offense under the criminal law and hold criminal responsibility through consideration of the content, seriousness, and degree of violation of the duty, and to discuss liability for damages by acknowledging illegal acts under the civil law.
      번역하기

      The breach crime of trust is a crime that constitutes 'property damage (unlawful consequences)' through 'mission violation (unlawful conduct)' of the office manager. However, in the illegal structure, the illegality of the act of breach does not resul...

      The breach crime of trust is a crime that constitutes 'property damage (unlawful consequences)' through 'mission violation (unlawful conduct)' of the office manager.
      However, in the illegal structure, the illegality of the act of breach does not result from any form of act directly related to property interests as an object of conduct, but from the trust relationship between [other handlers] formed through office work and the 'mission' formed on the premise of the 'violation'. Therefore, it is distinguished from other property crimes (e.g., theft, robbery, fraud, blackmail, embezzlement, etc.) that derive illegality from acts directly related to property.
      Therefore, in order to limit or reduce the scope of punishment, it is necessary to clarify the punishment of the punishment that is the former system is necessary.
      In order this end, the "The trust relationship relationship between the "Live surface) and the contents of the existing trust relationship, and the contents should be established. Also, interpretation theory that clearly restrictions of "breach" is necessary to clarify the act of "the legal Decree and contract" is necessary to clarify the act of breach of breach of crime. It is also desirable from the perspective of the criminal law to clarify the nature of the breach of trust by limiting the concept of damage to 'defeat', narrowing the illegality of the breach of trust and the scope of its responsibility. Furthermore, considering that there is no illegality of outcome in the case of 'non-damage-free breach of duty' and the illegality of conduct as a property crime is faint, it is desirable to convert it into a criminal offense under the criminal law and hold criminal responsibility through consideration of the content, seriousness, and degree of violation of the duty, and to discuss liability for damages by acknowledging illegal acts under the civil law.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      연관 공개강의(KOCW)

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼