시정오년기념(始政五年紀念) 조선물산공진회(朝鮮物産共進會)(1915)가 정재(呈才) 창사(唱詞)에 미친 영향 - <봉래의(鳳來儀)>를 중심으로 - = The Impact the 1915 Expo(始政五年紀念朝鮮物産共進會) had on Court Song Lyrics from the Perspective of < Bongnaeyi(鳳來儀) >

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This research paper examines the meaning behind the Court Song Lyrics which was performed at the 1915 Expo(始政五年紀念 朝鮮物産共進會) during September 11th to October 30th 1915, a period in which Korea was under Japanese Imperial rule. To do so requires the examinations of the characteristics of ‘Expo’, a new performance venue that appeared during the 1910s. Furthermore, an in-depth comparison between the Dadong Union(茶洞妓生組合)’s and Kwangyo Union(廣橋妓生組合)’s < Bongraeyi(鳳來儀) > lyrics to the version of < Bongraeyi > lyrics performed in the Chosun Dynasty court will reveal how the Expo influenced the Court Song Lyrics.
The Expo with the largest capacity in the 1910s, was held at the Kyungbok palace(景福宮) from September 11th to October 30th 1915 under the supervision of Japan. By publicly advertising the economic improvements of Korea post-colonization, the Expo was used as political propaganda of justification of Japanese Imperial rule; the Expo was a highly successful event with a total of one million visitors. To stimulate the flow of more visitors to the Expo, the Dadong Union and the Kwangyo Union rotated perform daily at the Expo. Considering that < Bongraeyi > performance space was at Kyungbok palace, an important change of power dynamics can be noted: while the < Bongraeyi > was historically performed at the same location, for the elite few belonging in the royal family. However, with the regime change, < Bongraeyi > was publicly performed at the Expo, thereby allowing an unrestricted quantity of average individuals to also watch the performance.
When < Bongraeyi > was performed during the imperialist rule, the differences in Dadong Union’s version versus that of the Kwangyo Union were prominent. Dadong Union maintained < Bongraeyi >’s musical components as used in the Chosun Dynasty but shortened the lyrics; The Kwangyo Union had two versions: there was a version that maintained the traditional performance characteristics as well as the new version. However, the new version increased the imperialist propaganda in that it described the current state of the nation as a paradise. The lyrics of the two versions were contrasting but similar in that both versions were to be sung by a melody and were flagrantly praising the imperialist regime. Therefore, it becomes evident that while < Bongraeyi >’s traditional melody and performance rules were maintained, the lyrics were changed to fit the Expo’s purpose of boasting the economic superiority of Korea post-imperialism.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이각규, "한국의 근대박람회" 커뮤니케이션북스 2010

2 김종수, "조선시대 궁중연향과 여악 연구" 민속원 2001

3 신경숙, "조선 궁중의 노래, 악장" 민속원 2016

4 강혜정, "일제 강점기, 전통 정재 창사의 계승과 변용 -박순호 소장 『리계향 ᄎᆡᆨ 李桂香 홀긔』를 중심으로-" 한국시가학회 47 : 109-138, 2019

5 강혜정, "일제 강점기 정재 침탈 양상 고찰―광교기생조합의 공진회(1915) 정재 창사를 중심으로―" 민족문화연구원 (88) : 337-362, 2020

6 강혜정, "신자료 『리계향 ᄎᆡᆨ 李桂香 홀긔』의 소지자 이계향에 대하여 - <츈ᄋᆡᆼ무> 연행을 중심으로 -" 한국어문학국제학술포럼 45 : 367-394, 2019

7 한동수, "식민도시 경성, 차별에서 파괴까지" 서울역사편찬원 2020

8 김영희, "시정오년기념조선물산공진회의 기생의 춤공연에 대한 연구" 국립국악원 (29) : 65-92, 2014

9 "리계향 최 李桂香 홀긔"

10 임혜정, "근대 일본의 박람회와 기생의 가무(歌舞) 활동" 한국공연문화학회 (24) : 339-371, 2012

11 경성협찬회잔무취급소, "경성협찬회보고" 동경인쇄주식회사 1916

12 방진아, "鳳來儀의 역사적 변천에 대한 연구 : 홀기를 중심으로" 한국예술종합학교 2013

13 조규익, "鳳來儀 進⋅退口號의 기능적 의미와 텍스트 양상" 한국시가문화학회 (32) : 215-240, 2013

14 "每日申報"

15 "新文界"

16 김승우, "<龍飛御天歌> 향유수용양상의 특징과 그 의미" 한국시가학회 23 : 81-113, 2007

17 김경희, "<봉래의>의 역사적 변천과 의미" 한국국악학회 29 : 275-294, 2001

18 김태웅, "1915년 京城府 物産共進會와 日帝의 政治宣傳" 서울학연구소 (18) : 139-168, 2002

19 송방송, "1910년대 정재의 전승 양상 : 기생 조합의 정재 공연을 중심으로" 국립국악원 17 : 147-185, 2008