日本語のYouTubeコメントに見られる正当化ストラテジー ― 「フェミニズム」に関する否定的なコメントを例に ― = Strategies of Legitimation in Japanese on YouTube Comments-Focus on Negative Comments about Feminism

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article tries to identify the reason why feminism in Japanese society is not active in terms of linguistics. Therefore, Japanese negative YouTube comments about feminism are analyzed from the perspective of legitimation to reveal the awareness of Japanese people. First, the results of codifying the comments os that there are 91% of negative comments, and also, the results of analyzing them in terms of legitimation is that classification is used the most, and quotation > evaluation > definition > emotion > speculation and estimation > example > authorization > cooperation = others are seen. Some awareness about feminism in Japanese society is confirmed from these result. First of all, there is the premise which is the reason why they are feminists is that they are not pretty and are not seen as sex objects. On the other hand, classification strategies which only a part of feminists(Twi󰠏Femi, radical feminists, etc) are criticized and, the past feminists are sympathized, however, modern feminists are not sympathized are found. Moreover, quotation strategies which not only the current situation in Japanese society but also the past such as the war era and school days are used to express the opposition to the needs of feminism. Furthermore, the premise in which feminists and females have the privilege because they are in a weak position and knew that are revealed with evaluating the character of feminists, definition, and example strategy. Also, in the case of speculation and estimation, the one claim which female are seen as sex objects because they makeup and dress up, therefore, this awareness affect to the disgust and victim󰠏blaming. Besides, through cooperation strategy, many opinions in which gender equality is impossible because there is the scientific basis of the difference between brain and body between males and females. These discussions are revealed in feminism researches, however, these are also found in YouTube comments from the perspective in linguistics in this research. It can be able to do the comparison research to other nations by using this legitimation forms.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 ウンサ―シュッツ・ジャカーラ, "電子掲示板における「常識」への訴えの役割―正当化ストラテジーと「常識」の関係―" 立正大学心理学研究所 16 : 23-36, 2008

2 新井恭子, "説得力とは何か―広告表現におけることばの効果―" 東洋大学学術情報リポジトリ (69) : 171-183, 2007

3 "自称フェミニストが害悪すぎる件について"

4 橋谷萌賀, "正当化の観点から見るストラテジーの日韓比較 ― #MeTooに関するYouTubeのコメントを中心に ―" 한국일본어교육학회 (91) : 179-198, 2020

5 韓娥凛, "日韓政治ディスコースにおける正当化ストラテジー：批判的談話分析による異文化間対照の試み" 30 : 41-69, 2018

6 원지은, "日韓の説得コミュニケーション研究の現状と課題" 동아시아일본학회 (38) : 367-382, 2011

7 원지은, "日韓の説得コミュニケーションの研究" 한국일본근대학회 (52) : 29-44, 2016

8 菊池夏野, "日本のポストフェミニズム―「女子力」とネオリベラリズム" 大月書店 80-81, 2019

9 "女性専用車両は馬鹿げてる？英国、フェミニストや政治家が批判"

10 "加藤純一、フェミニストを再び論破してしまう"

11 "体毛の歴史から考える、女性らしさとフェミニズム"

12 李聖娥, "フェミニズムは誰のもの? ―女性嫌悪発言から見る現代韓国社会－" 早稲田大学社会科学学会 57-67, 2015

13 "フェミニズムってなんか怖い？と思っているあなたに届け"

14 "が韓国女性について話さない理由とは？韓国の男女の葛藤？フェミニズム？＜現在削除されている＞"

15 "【フェミニズムと北条政子】おはようバーチャルおばあちゃん【2020年2月9日号】"

16 "【テキサス親父】韓国のフェミニズムが米国を超える"

17 "『フェミニストからのメッセージ』予告編-Netflix"

18 "『フェミニスト』の皆さん、勉強しなさい＜現在削除されている＞"

19 菊池夏野, "「女子力」とポストフェミニズムー大学生の「女子力」使用実態アンケート調査からー" 名古屋市立大学大学院人間文化研究科 (25) : 18-48, 2016

20 Antonio Reyes, "Strategies of Legitimation in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions" The SAGE Social Science Collections 22 (22): 781-807, 2011

21 Camelia-Mihaela Cmeciu, "Online Discursive (De)legitimation of the Roma Community" 24 : 80-98, 2016

22 Mark C. Suchman, "Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches" 20 (20): 571-610, 1995

23 Patricia Bou-Franch, "Gender ideology and social identity processes in online language aggression against women" Oxford University Press 2 (2): 226-248, 2014

24 Maria Joutsenvirta, "Discursive (de)legitimation of a contested Finnish greenfield investment project in Latin America" 25 : 85-96, 2009

25 Van Leeuwen, T., "Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford Studies in sociolinguistics" Oxford University Press 2008