RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      포괄수가제도 당연적용 효과평가 = The Effect of Mandatory Diagnosis-Related Groups Payment System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102001185

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: The voluntary diagnosis-related groups (DRG)-based payment system was introduced in 2002 and the government mandated participation in the DRG for all hospitals from July 2013. The main purpose of this study is to examine the independent ef...

      Background: The voluntary diagnosis-related groups (DRG)-based payment system was introduced in 2002 and the government mandated participation in the DRG for all hospitals from July 2013. The main purpose of this study is to examine the independent effect of mandatory participation in DRG on various outcomes of patients. Methods: This study collected 1,809,948 inpatient DRG data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database which contains medical information for all patients for the period 2007 to 2014 and examined patient outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), total medical cost, spillover, and readmission rate according to hospital size. Results: LOS of patients decreased after DRGs (large hospitals: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.97; small hospitals: aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.91-0.92). The total medical cost of patients increased after DRGs (large hospitals: aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.30; small hospitals: aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.21-1.23). The results reveals that spillover of patients increased after DRGs (large hospitals: aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.70-2.33; small hospitals: aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.16-1.20). Finally, we found that readmission rates of patients decreased significantly after DRGs (large hospitals: aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.26-0.29; small hospitals: aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.56-0.63). Conclusion: The DRG payment system compared to fee-for-service payment in South Korea may be an alternative medical price policy which can reduce the LOS. However, government need to monitor inappropriate changes such as spillover increase. Since this study also is the results based on relatively simple surgery, insurer needs to compare or review bundled payment like new DRG for expansion of various inpatient-related diseases including internal medicine.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이미옥, "한 종합병원의 포괄수가제 실시 전후 수정체수술환자의 의료서비스 및 진료비 비교분석" 한국병원경영학회 10 (10): 48-70, 2005

      2 최재우, "우리나라 국민건강보험제도의 보험료 부담 형평성에 관한 연구" 한국보건사회연구원 35 (35): 199-221, 2015

      3 Tsai TC, "Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care" 369 (369): 1134-1142, 2013

      4 Chen Q, "Using a composite readmission measure to assess surgical quality in the Veterans Health Administration: how well does it correlate with established surgical measures?" 149 (149): 1206-1207, 2014

      5 Ahn HS, "Use of antibiotics of hospitals and comparison of antibiotics use before and after the pilot program on DRG payment system" 19 (19): 137-143, 2001

      6 Wish JB, "The role of 30-day readmission as a measure of quality" 9 (9): 440-442, 2014

      7 Khan A, "Same-hospital readmission rates as a measure of pediatric quality of care" 169 (169): 905-912, 2015

      8 Kim JH, "Revaluation of a pilot program on DRG payment system: focusing on evaluation methodology" 8 (8): 59-89, 2002

      9 Cohn A, "Readmission rates are a poor marker of quality" 348 : g1148-, 2014

      10 Kim J, "Performance of DRG-based reimbursement policy in National Health Insurance: eight years’ experiences" 18 (18): A546-, 2015

      1 이미옥, "한 종합병원의 포괄수가제 실시 전후 수정체수술환자의 의료서비스 및 진료비 비교분석" 한국병원경영학회 10 (10): 48-70, 2005

      2 최재우, "우리나라 국민건강보험제도의 보험료 부담 형평성에 관한 연구" 한국보건사회연구원 35 (35): 199-221, 2015

      3 Tsai TC, "Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care" 369 (369): 1134-1142, 2013

      4 Chen Q, "Using a composite readmission measure to assess surgical quality in the Veterans Health Administration: how well does it correlate with established surgical measures?" 149 (149): 1206-1207, 2014

      5 Ahn HS, "Use of antibiotics of hospitals and comparison of antibiotics use before and after the pilot program on DRG payment system" 19 (19): 137-143, 2001

      6 Wish JB, "The role of 30-day readmission as a measure of quality" 9 (9): 440-442, 2014

      7 Khan A, "Same-hospital readmission rates as a measure of pediatric quality of care" 169 (169): 905-912, 2015

      8 Kim JH, "Revaluation of a pilot program on DRG payment system: focusing on evaluation methodology" 8 (8): 59-89, 2002

      9 Cohn A, "Readmission rates are a poor marker of quality" 348 : g1148-, 2014

      10 Kim J, "Performance of DRG-based reimbursement policy in National Health Insurance: eight years’ experiences" 18 (18): A546-, 2015

      11 Kwon S, "Payment system reform for health care providers in Korea" 18 (18): 84-92, 2003

      12 Jian W, "Payment Reform Pilot In Beijing Hospitals Reduced Expenditures And Out-Of-Pocket Payments Per Admission" 34 (34): 1745-1752, 2015

      13 송정국, "Participation Determinants in the DRG Payment System of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics in South Korea" 대한예방의학회 43 (43): 117-124, 2010

      14 Lee KJ, "Medical services for cesarean section cases in one DRG pilot study hospital" 4 (4): 21-40, 1999

      15 Yang SH, "Mediation use analysis in the application of DRG-based payment system" 17 (17): 135-140, 2000

      16 Choi BH, "Management experience for DRG-PPS in the U.S. and evaluation for DRG demonstration project in Korea" 5 : 133-154, 1999

      17 Fischer C, "Is the readmission rate a valid quality indicator?: a review of the evidence" 9 (9): e112282-, 2014

      18 Dimick JB, "Hospital readmission as a quality measure in surgery" 313 (313): 512-513, 2015

      19 Girotti ME, "Health policy update: rethinking hospital readmission as a surgical quality measure" 149 (149): 757-758, 2014

      20 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, "Health at a glance: average length of stay in hospitals" Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing 2015

      21 Seoul National University, "Evaluation and improvement measurements of pilot program on DRG" Seoul National University 2000

      22 Health Insurance Review and Assessment, "Effect of mandatory DRG payment system and improvement measurements" Health Insurance Review and Assessment 2015

      23 최숙자, "DRG(Diagnosis-Related Group)를 이용한 포괄진료비 지불제도의 선택 참여에 따른 재원일수 변화" 한국보건행정학회 20 (20): 17-39, 2010

      24 박은철, "DRG 지불제도에 대한 미국의 경험과 우리나라에의 시사점" 한국병원경영학회 7 (7): 105-120, 2002

      25 손창우, "DRG 지불제도가 재원일수와 퇴원 후 외래방문일수에 미치는 영향: 2004-2007년도 제왕절개술을 중심으로" 대한예방의학회 44 (44): 48-55, 2011

      26 이기성, "DRG 지불제도 참여기관의 재원일수 변이에 관한 연구" 한국보건행정학회 16 (16): 77-95, 2006

      27 Chae HY, "DRG payment system and health care providers’ incentives" 9 (9): 1-24, 2003

      28 Kang MS, "Comparative analysis of diagnosis-related-groups payment and fee for service" 5 (5): 35-41, 2001

      29 Yim J, "Changes in quality of care for cesarean section after implementation of diagnosis-related groups/prospective payment system" 34 (34): 347-353, 2001

      30 Fischer C, "A systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between quality of hospital care and readmission rates in patients with heart failure" 170 (170): 1005-1017, 2015

      31 Kim JS, "A study on patients’ satisfaction and service utilization in the DRG based payment system: patients who experienced cesarean section before and after the demonstration program" 7 (7): 190-202, 2000

      32 Health Insurance Review and Assessment, "A study of development plan on seven diagnosis-related groups (DRG)" Health Insurance Review and Assessment 2009

      33 신삼철, "7개 질병군 포괄수가제 도입에 따른 일개 대학병원의 진료행태 변화 모의실험" 한국보건행정학회 23 (23): 103-111, 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-03-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Health Policy And Administration -> Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management KCI등재
      2013-03-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration -> Health Policy and Mangemnet KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.78 0.78 0.8
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.81 0.78 1.372 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼