RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      竝列型 校舍棟의 外部空間 規模特性 및 利用行態에 관한 硏究 : 淸州·淸原地方의 公立初等學校를 中心으로 = The Size and Using Condition of Outdoor Space in the Parallel Types of Elementary School Buildings:focused on Chongju·Chongwon Province in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8941653

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The study is based on one of the examples in the parallel types of school buildings, the finger plan. The purpose is to learn the best possible usage of outdoor space between school buildings and to use it in developing the block plan and the unit plan of elementary school buildings. The study focused on 25 of the public elementary schools in Chongju(19) and chong-won(6), chung-Buk, Korea. The results were obtained after investigating the scales, characteristics, facilities and the pattern of using the outdoor space between school buildings.
      First of all, on the scale of the outdoor spaces between school buildings, the distance between buildings in most of the cases spread out between 20 and 22 meters.
      In terms of the ratio of the distance(D) between buildings and the length(L)of building, actually, the length is longer than the distance (L/D > 5). Hence, it can be anticipated to the stronger line of the outdoor space than buildings when considering its degree of sharpness. But, in fact, the breezeways, cores, and warehouses in outdoor space made space partitions(L/D = 2.2∼2.5) providing the new area and enclosure. Therefore, the line of outdoor space is different from what we had expected before.
      In terms of the ratio of the distance(D) between buildings and the height(H) of the building, in case of the cities, the fraction of the distance to the height is between 1 and 2(1 ≤ D/H ≤ 2), and , in case of the areas smaller than cities, the distance is 2 times more than the height(D/H ≥ 2). When considering its floors, the fraction of the distance to the height of the parallel type buildings are between 1 and 1.5(1≤ D/H < 1.5) in case of 4 floors, between 1.5 and 2.0(1.5 ≤ D/H ≤ 2.0) in case of 3 floors, and more 2 (2.0 ≤ D/H) in case of 2 floors.
      Moreover, in most of the cases, the facilities in outdoor space divided between buildings in the parallel types have breezeways, flower beds, water places, and warehouses almost between 20 and 22 meters(L/D = 2.2∼2.4, 1.5< D/H < 2.0). Therefore, the outdoor space providing the new area and enclosure are used frequently. Students use the area during class recess and lunch break 2 to 3 times a day. Not only the students but the teachers also usually favor the arbors and flower beds in the facilities. They also want to have facilities where they can have some time away from others such as arbors or water parks.
      번역하기

      The study is based on one of the examples in the parallel types of school buildings, the finger plan. The purpose is to learn the best possible usage of outdoor space between school buildings and to use it in developing the block plan and the unit pla...

      The study is based on one of the examples in the parallel types of school buildings, the finger plan. The purpose is to learn the best possible usage of outdoor space between school buildings and to use it in developing the block plan and the unit plan of elementary school buildings. The study focused on 25 of the public elementary schools in Chongju(19) and chong-won(6), chung-Buk, Korea. The results were obtained after investigating the scales, characteristics, facilities and the pattern of using the outdoor space between school buildings.
      First of all, on the scale of the outdoor spaces between school buildings, the distance between buildings in most of the cases spread out between 20 and 22 meters.
      In terms of the ratio of the distance(D) between buildings and the length(L)of building, actually, the length is longer than the distance (L/D > 5). Hence, it can be anticipated to the stronger line of the outdoor space than buildings when considering its degree of sharpness. But, in fact, the breezeways, cores, and warehouses in outdoor space made space partitions(L/D = 2.2∼2.5) providing the new area and enclosure. Therefore, the line of outdoor space is different from what we had expected before.
      In terms of the ratio of the distance(D) between buildings and the height(H) of the building, in case of the cities, the fraction of the distance to the height is between 1 and 2(1 ≤ D/H ≤ 2), and , in case of the areas smaller than cities, the distance is 2 times more than the height(D/H ≥ 2). When considering its floors, the fraction of the distance to the height of the parallel type buildings are between 1 and 1.5(1≤ D/H < 1.5) in case of 4 floors, between 1.5 and 2.0(1.5 ≤ D/H ≤ 2.0) in case of 3 floors, and more 2 (2.0 ≤ D/H) in case of 2 floors.
      Moreover, in most of the cases, the facilities in outdoor space divided between buildings in the parallel types have breezeways, flower beds, water places, and warehouses almost between 20 and 22 meters(L/D = 2.2∼2.4, 1.5< D/H < 2.0). Therefore, the outdoor space providing the new area and enclosure are used frequently. Students use the area during class recess and lunch break 2 to 3 times a day. Not only the students but the teachers also usually favor the arbors and flower beds in the facilities. They also want to have facilities where they can have some time away from others such as arbors or water parks.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • 1. 서론 = 1
      • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
      • 1.2 연구의 대상 및 범위 = 2
      • 1.3 연구의 방법 및 진행과정 = 3
      • 목차
      • 1. 서론 = 1
      • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
      • 1.2 연구의 대상 및 범위 = 2
      • 1.3 연구의 방법 및 진행과정 = 3
      • 2. 청주·청원지역 공립초등학교의 현황 = 5
      • 2.1 학급 및 학생수 현황 = 5
      • 2.1.1 학급수별 분포현황 = 5
      • 2.1.2 학급당 학생수의 변화 = 8
      • 2.1.3 학생 1인당 교사 및 교지면적 = 10
      • 2.2 교사동의 배치현황 = 11
      • 2.2.1 교사의 동수별 분포현황 = 11
      • 2.2.2 교사동의 배치유형별 분류 및 특징 = 13
      • 2.2.3 학급수별 교사동의 배치유형 = 17
      • 2.3 병렬형 교사동의 분포현황 및 사례연구 대상지 = 20
      • 2.3.1 병렬형 교사동의 분포현황 = 20
      • 2.3.2 사례연구대상지의 개요 = 21
      • 3. 병렬형 교사동 외부공간의 규모 및 성격 = 24
      • 3.1 교사동 길이(L)와 인동가격(D) = 24
      • 3.1.1 L/D비 분포현황 = 24
      • 3.1.2 외부공간의 구획 = 25
      • 3.1.3 L/D비에 의한 외부공간의 성격 = 32
      • 3.2 교사동 높이(H)와 인동간격(D) = 32
      • 3.2.1 D/H비 분포현황 = 32
      • 3.2.2 D/H비에 의한 외부공간의 성격 = 35
      • 3.2.3 교사동간 높낮이에 따른 단면구성 = 36
      • 3.3 외부공간의 규모특성 = 38
      • 4. 병렬형 교사동 외부공간의 이용형태 = 40
      • 4.1 외부공간의 시설활용 현황 = 40
      • 4.1.1 외부공간 이용유형 및 시설물의 종류 = 40
      • 4.1.2 D, D/H비에 따른 외부시설물 설치현황 = 45
      • 4.1.3 조경시설 및 바닥포장재 = 49
      • 4.2 외부공간의 이용조사분석 = 52
      • 4.2.1 사례 관찰 및 설문조사의 개요 = 52
      • 4.2.2 이용빈도 및 시간대 분포 = 53
      • 4.2.3 선호하는 외부공간 = 54
      • 4.2.4 요구하는 외부공간 = 56
      • 4.3 구획된 외부공간의 시설내용 및 이용특성 = 58
      • 5. 결론 = 60
      • 참고문헌 = 62
      • ABSTRACT = 65
      • 부록 = 68
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼