국내 계획공동체 마을의 주민참여의 실태 및 특성 = Actual Condition and Characteristics of Residents' Participation of Intentional Communities in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In Korea, a movement for forming intentional communities is gathering people's interests to improve individualistic living environment, and to create a humanistic lifestyle. However, it is difficult to say if its management is successful or not, because intentional community is just in the experimental stage in Korea. The purpose of this study is to identify actual condition of residents' participation in forming process, shared activities in their daily lives, residents' regulation, common facilities and its management in order to offer basic information for revitalization of intentional communities in Korea. 7 intentional communities including eco-friendly villages, religious communities and a cooperative housing community were collected as the study objects. Upon analysis, those communities were divided into two groups according to their purpose of establishment; "HC (Housing-life focused Community includes cooperative housing community and eco-friendly community)" and "IC (Ideology focused Community includes ideology community and religious community)" in order to identify difference in residents' participation between the two groups. In-dept interviews with representatives of 7 intentional communities by a structured questionnaire were used as study method. The findings of this study are as follows; In general, more active residents' participation is identified in ICs than in HCs. There is no common house, which is considered as essential in intentional community, in HCs, while it was facilitated in all ICs. Role of leader seems more important in ICs than in HCs. About the ownership of housing and land, private owned is common in HCs, while community owned is common in ICs. Shared activities and residents' regulations are evidently less in most HCs than in ICs. Furthermore, in order to run a community sustainable, it is crucial to encourage sense of community among residents, and developing common house and activity programs. Common house design, which can promote proactive residents' participation in shared activity should be studied fitted to Korean circumstances. Above all, proactive participation in the shared activities is one of the most important factors in intentional community.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최정신, "해외 계획공동체 마을의 특성-코하우징을 중심으로-" 2007

2 최정신, "한국인 50대의 노인용 코하우징 공유공간과 공동활동에 대한 선호 -서울과 지방도시 간 차이 비교를 중심으로-" 한국주거학회 18 (18): 131-139, 2007

3 김상희, "한국에서의 거주자 참가형 주택 개발의 방향" 10 (10): 303-321, 2000

4 홍서정, "한국 농촌형 코하우징의 계획" 가톨릭대학교 2005

5 곽유미, "커뮤니티 활성화를 위한 친환경마을의 공동생활시설 계획" 가톨릭대학교 2008

6 곽유미, "주생활 공동체 의식에 따른 코하우징 선호도" 한국주거학회 18 (18): 37-48, 2007

7 한주희, "주부의 취업유무에 따른 코하우징 요구의 차이" 115-, 2004

8 오영식, "이용자 참여에 의한 마을 만들기-태백시 상장동 학마을 사례" 청주대학교 2002

9 "야마기시회 홈페이지"

10 최정신, "스웨덴과 덴마크 노인용 코하우징 주민의 생활만족도 비교" 한국주거학회 16 (16): 149-160, 2005

11 한주희, "맞벌이 가족을 위한 한국형 코하우징 계획안" 가톨릭대학교 2005

12 조성기, "도시주거학" 동명사 2001

13 주거학 연구회, "더불어 사는 이웃, 세계의 코하우징" 교문사 2000

14 박정래, "국수리 정자골 거북마을 만들기 자료집"

15 곽유미, "국내 계획공동체 마을의 주민참여에 관한 연구" 123-128, 2008

16 민병호, "공동주택 외부공간 중 커뮤니티 행위 장소에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 22 (22): 39-47, 2006

17 황익주, "골목길과 광장 및 공원; 도시에서의 “우리동네” 형성에 관한 인류학적 에세이" 49 (49): 6-76, 2005

18 전호상, "계획공동체 마을의 공간구성" 성균관대학교 2007

19 녹색연합, "경남 산청군 신안면"간디생태마을"기본계획"

20 김상희, "거주자 참가형 주택개발을 위한 주의식 조사연구, 경상남도 창원시와 마산시 거주자를 대상으로" 12 (12): 13-23, 2001

21 Williams,Jo, "Sun, Surf and Sustainable Housing- Cohousing, the California Experience" 10 (10): 145-177, 2005

22 Fromm,Dorit, "Collaborative Communities-Cohousing"

23 Choi,Jung Shin, "An Analysis of Characteristic of Intentional Communities in Foreign Countries-In Reference to Differences between Cohousing and Ecovillage-" 2008

24 Kwak, Y.M, "A Case Study of Residents’ Participation in Intentional Community in Korea, -In Reference to Mindle Community-" 2008

25 Kwak, Y.M, "A Case Study of Common Activities by Residents’ Participation in Eco-Friendly Village in Korea -In Reference to Ansolgi Village-" 2007