A Critical Survey of the Channel Islands Dispute between the Uk and France: A Comparative Study of the Minquiers-Ecrehos Case and the Dokdo Problem

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

After the 1998 Korea-Japan fisheries agreement, the Korean government was open to the criticism - that the agreement may have given Japan an excuse to assert possession over the Dokdo. The main reason for the criticism regarding the 1998 fisheries agreement is that Dokdo is located in the provisionally arranged zone which is a kind of common management water area stipulated by the agreement. To avoid these criticisms, the Korean government used the Minquiers - Ecrehos case. They asserted that the fisheries agreement and sovereignty of Dokdo are totally unrelated, and they applied the Minquiers - Ecrehos case as a precedent to support their claim. It was because the International Court of Justice excluded the effect of fishery convention between the UK and France to decide the sovereignty of the islands in the Minquiers - Ecrehos case. However, the decision of ICJ in the Minquiers - Ecrehos case should not be applied to Dokdo problem without distinguishing different situations. It is a dangerous attitude to adopt a certain international legal theory to particular cases without considering the specific situations of the disputed area. In the Minquiers - Ecrehos case, the effect of fishery convention to decide the sovereignty of the islands was not the ratio decidendi. The ratio decidendi of the case was the effective possession. Hence, it is unreasonable that the attempt to adopt this case to the 1998 Korea-Japan fisheries agreement. There are many different features between the Minquiers - Ecrehos case and the Dokdo problem such as geographical, historical and political situations. However, the arguments from the Minquiers - Ecrehos case can be applied to the settlement of the territorial dispute over Dokdo. In particular, the Minquiers - Ecrehos case suggests that the evidence of effective possession is the key to solve Dokdo problem.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, "Treaties and Statutes of Northeast Asian Nations Pertaining to the Law of the Sea (Ilchogak Publishing"

2 The Department for Constitutional Affairs, "The UK, ‘Background briefing on the Crown Dependencies: Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man"

3 E. C. Wade, "The Minquiers and Ecrehous Case" Problems of Public and Private International Law 40 : 1954

4 ICJ, "The Minquiers and Ecrehos case" 1953

5 D. H. N. Johnson, "The Minquiers and Ecrehos Case" 3 (3): 1954

6 R. R. Churchill, "The Law of the Sea"

7 "The Island of Palmas Case"

8 Young-Koo Kim, "The Crisis of the Sovereignty over Dokdo" Dasom Publishing 2006

9 Wm. W. Bishop, "Minquiers and Ecrehos Case (France/United Kingdom)" 48 (48): 1954

10 "Legal Status of Eastern Greenland"

11 "Law on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone"

12 "Convention between Her Majesty and the King of the French, defining and regulating the Limits of the Exclusive Right of the Oyster and Other Fishery on the Coasts of Great Britain and of France"

13 "Convention between H.M. and King of French, defining and regulating Limits of Exclusive Right of Fisheries"

14 "Case Concerning The Temple of Preah Vihear"

15 "Agreement on Fisheries between the Republic of Korea and Japan"

16 "Agreement between the Republic of Korea and Japan concerning Fisheries"

17 "Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the French Republic regarding Rights of Fishery in areas of the Ecrehos and Minquiers"

18 Han-Key Lee, "A Study on the Minquiers and Ecrehos Case" 9 (9): 1967