통합교과와 교과교육론의 공통과제 = The Common Problem of Curriculum Integration and Theory of Teaching a Subject

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to explore the common problem of curriculum integration and theory of teaching a subject. Even thought student learns diverse subjects in each different place and time, the result of learning must be placed in same student` mind. In terms of this tacit dimension of a subject, if curriculum integration has not any relation with integration in student` mind, it has no basis as a theory of teaching. Also, This study interprets the `mode` theory of Oakeshott as giving explanation to the common problem. A subject as `mode` is not partial substance, but abstract world of idea. A subject as `mode` is not a separable part of reality, but the whole of experience from a limited view of the totality of experience. But, a subject as `mode` is defective, and therefore the totality of experience can not be explained in term of a subject as `mode` or some. The relation of these abstract worlds of ideas to the totality of experience is so important. A `conversation` or `encounter` of subjects as modes in a certain moment contributes to the totality of experience. Divergent subjects as modes, conflicting and harmonizing with each other, make up for defects or limits, which each subjects as `mode` can not avoid in attempting to express the totality of experience. On the basis of education of whole man, there is no way to justify a subject only by itself. The authentic justification of a subject is up to how much a certain subject, combined with other subjects, contributes to the development of whole personality of a student. curriculum integration and theory of teaching a subject has a indispensable relationship like each sides of the same coin. Curriculum integration and theory of teaching a subject have a problem in common, in that curriculum integration and theory of teaching a subject have excluded each other on purpose or not, therefore both together have forgotten basic concept like education of whole man.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Oakeshott, M., "학습의 장.상・하, in: 가을-겨울" 중앙교육연구소 162-171, 1992

2 유한구, "초등학교 통합교과 교육론" 교육과학사 1998

3 김승호, "차기 초등교육과정에서의 통합교과의 성격" 공주교육대학교 초등교육연구소 8 (8): 19-43, 2008

4 이홍우, "전인교육론" 8 : 1-21, 1996

5 이홍우, "인간본성론" 서울대학교 사범대학 교육학과 10 (10): 1-19, 1996

6 양명수, "근대성과 종교" 이화여대출판부 2001

7 유한구, "교과이론과 교과정책" 성경재 2002

8 이돈희, "교과교육학의 성격과 과제.in: 교과교육학 탐구" 교육과학사 1994

9 김승호, "교과교육론 서설" 한국교육과정학회 27 (27): 83-106, 2009

10 Pinar,W, "What Is Curriculum Theory?" Lawrence Eribaum 2004

11 Oakeshott, M., "The Voice of Liberal Learning. in The Voice of Liberal Learning" Yale University Press 1989

12 Bruner,J, "The Process of Education" Harvard University Press 1960

13 Fogarty,R, "The Minful School: How to Integrate the Curricula." Skylight Publishing 1991

14 Pieper,J, "Leisure：The Basis of Culture" Pantheon Book 1952

15 Oakeshott,M, "Experience and its modes" Cambridge University Press 1933

16 Tyler,R.W, "Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction" The University of Chicago Press 1949