RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      『햄릿』에서 셰익스피어의 관객 통제 = Shakespeare’s Audience Control in Hamlet

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103995679

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article aims to reveal that Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written in order to get a positive response from the audience. The playwright created the hero, Hamlet, for that purpose. Shakespeare controlled audience response by creating Hamlet who was n...

      This article aims to reveal that Shakespeare’s Hamlet was written in order to get a positive response from the audience. The playwright created the hero, Hamlet, for that purpose. Shakespeare controlled audience response by creating Hamlet who was not against the beliefs and concepts of the times. The audience favors Hamlet who is good-natured and moral and who mostly delays the revenge of his dead father. The more Hamlet delays, the more the audience favors him. Delaying is the result of ‘thought’ and his thought is the expression of his conscience. Therefore the audience liked Hamlet’s conscientiousness. This article will prove this argument by discussing how Hamlet is good-natured and moral, finally it will show why the ‘thought’ is related with Hamlet’s delay.
      Hamlet’s audience would at least have understood his reasons for the delay of revenge and would have understood that conscientious ones had no choice but to delay, therefore they came to understand Hamlet’s actions. The audience liked Hamlet because the audience was aware of the literary tradition of ‘thought’ that dates back to the Middle Ages and shared the beliefs and concepts of the times.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Terry, Reta, "Vows to the Blackest Devil: Hamlet and the Evolving Code of Honor in Early Modern England" 52 : 1070-1086, 1999

      2 Campbell, Lily, "Theories of Revenge in Renaissance England" 28 : 281-296, 1931

      3 Levine, Richard, "The Tragedy of Hamlet’s World View" 23 : 539-546, 1962

      4 Spinrad, Phoebe, "The Fall of the Sparrow and the Map of Hamlet’s Mind" 102 : 453-477, 2005

      5 Belsey, Catherine, "The Case of Hamlet’s Conscience" 76 : 127-148, 1979

      6 Honigmann, E.A.J., "Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies Revisited: the Dramatist’s Manipulation of Response" Palgrave 2002

      7 Skulsky, Harold, "Revenge, Honor, and Conscience in Hamlet" 85 : 78-87, 1970

      8 Broude, Ronald, "Revenge and Revenge Tragedy in Renaissance England" 28 : 38-58, 1975

      9 Greenfield, Sayre, "Quoting Hamlet in the Early Seventeenth Century" 105 : 510-534, 2008

      10 Ghose, Indira, "Jesting with Death: Hamlet in the Graveyard" 24 : 1003-1018, 2010

      1 Terry, Reta, "Vows to the Blackest Devil: Hamlet and the Evolving Code of Honor in Early Modern England" 52 : 1070-1086, 1999

      2 Campbell, Lily, "Theories of Revenge in Renaissance England" 28 : 281-296, 1931

      3 Levine, Richard, "The Tragedy of Hamlet’s World View" 23 : 539-546, 1962

      4 Spinrad, Phoebe, "The Fall of the Sparrow and the Map of Hamlet’s Mind" 102 : 453-477, 2005

      5 Belsey, Catherine, "The Case of Hamlet’s Conscience" 76 : 127-148, 1979

      6 Honigmann, E.A.J., "Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies Revisited: the Dramatist’s Manipulation of Response" Palgrave 2002

      7 Skulsky, Harold, "Revenge, Honor, and Conscience in Hamlet" 85 : 78-87, 1970

      8 Broude, Ronald, "Revenge and Revenge Tragedy in Renaissance England" 28 : 38-58, 1975

      9 Greenfield, Sayre, "Quoting Hamlet in the Early Seventeenth Century" 105 : 510-534, 2008

      10 Ghose, Indira, "Jesting with Death: Hamlet in the Graveyard" 24 : 1003-1018, 2010

      11 Blincoe, Noel, "Is Gertrude an Adultress?" 10 : 18-24, 1997

      12 Foley, Andrew, "Heaven or Havoc? The End of Hamlet" 24 : 45-56, 2012

      13 Hoff, Linda, "Hamlet’s Choice: Hamlet-a Reformation Allegory" Edwin Mellen Press 1988

      14 Kirsch, Arthur, "Hamlet's Grief" 48 : 17-36, 1981

      15 Moore, Peter R., "Hamlet and Piers Plowman: A Matter of Conscience" 65 : 11-24, 2004

      16 De Grazia, Margreta, "Hamlet Without Hamlet" Cambridge UP 2008

      17 Siegel, Paul, "Discerning the Ghost in Hamlet" 78 : 148-149, 1963

      18 Shakespeare, William, "Ann Thomson and Neil Taylor" Cengage Learning 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2018 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-04-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스 영문학회 -> 한국 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-07-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스영문학회 -> 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.15 1.112 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼