RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      산지 경계 추출을 위한 지형학적 변수 선정과 알고리즘 개발 = A Study on the Development of Topographical Variables and Algorithm for Mountain Classification

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105617598

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Korea, 64% of the land is known as mountain area, but the definition and classification standard of mountain are not clear. Demand for utilization and development of mountain area is increasing. In this situation, the unclear definition and scope of the mountain area can lead to the destruction of the mountain and the increase of disasters due to indiscreet permission of forestland use conversion. Therefore, this study analyzed the variables and criteria that can extract the mountain boundaries through the questionnaire survey and the terrain analysis. We developed a mountain boundary extraction algorithm that can classify topographic mountain by using selected variables. As a result, 72.1% of the total land was analyzed as mountain area. For the three catchment areas with different mountain area ratio, we compared the results with the existing data such as forestland map and cadastral map. We confirmed the differences in boundary and distribution of mountain. In a catchment area with predominantly mountainous area, the algorithm-based mountain classification results were judged to be wider than the mountain or forest of the two maps. On the other hand, in the basin where the non-mountainous region predominated, algorithm-based results yielded a lower mountain area ratio than the other two maps. In the two maps, we was able to confirm the distribution of fragmented mountains. However, these areas were classified as non-mountain areas in algorithm-based results. We concluded that this result occurred because of the algorithm, so it is necessary to refine and elaborate the algorithm afterward. Nevertheless, this algorithm can analyze the topographic variables and the optimal value by watershed that can distinguish the mountain area. The results of this study are significant in that the mountain boundaries were extracted considering the characteristics of different mountain topography by region. This study will help establish policies for stable mountain management.
      번역하기

      In Korea, 64% of the land is known as mountain area, but the definition and classification standard of mountain are not clear. Demand for utilization and development of mountain area is increasing. In this situation, the unclear definition and scope o...

      In Korea, 64% of the land is known as mountain area, but the definition and classification standard of mountain are not clear. Demand for utilization and development of mountain area is increasing. In this situation, the unclear definition and scope of the mountain area can lead to the destruction of the mountain and the increase of disasters due to indiscreet permission of forestland use conversion. Therefore, this study analyzed the variables and criteria that can extract the mountain boundaries through the questionnaire survey and the terrain analysis. We developed a mountain boundary extraction algorithm that can classify topographic mountain by using selected variables. As a result, 72.1% of the total land was analyzed as mountain area. For the three catchment areas with different mountain area ratio, we compared the results with the existing data such as forestland map and cadastral map. We confirmed the differences in boundary and distribution of mountain. In a catchment area with predominantly mountainous area, the algorithm-based mountain classification results were judged to be wider than the mountain or forest of the two maps. On the other hand, in the basin where the non-mountainous region predominated, algorithm-based results yielded a lower mountain area ratio than the other two maps. In the two maps, we was able to confirm the distribution of fragmented mountains. However, these areas were classified as non-mountain areas in algorithm-based results. We concluded that this result occurred because of the algorithm, so it is necessary to refine and elaborate the algorithm afterward. Nevertheless, this algorithm can analyze the topographic variables and the optimal value by watershed that can distinguish the mountain area. The results of this study are significant in that the mountain boundaries were extracted considering the characteristics of different mountain topography by region. This study will help establish policies for stable mountain management.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 허진숙, "환경교육적 탐구를 통한 유역 중심의 물 환경교육 교재화 연구 - 무심천 유역을 중심으로 -" 한국환경교육학회 21 (21): 25-39, 2008

      2 박수진, "한반도 평탄지의 유형분류와 형성과정" 대한지리학회 44 (44): 31-55, 2009

      3 박수진, "한반도 지형의 일반성과 특수성, 그리고 지속가능성" 대한지리학회 49 (49): 656-674, 2014

      4 박수진, "한국 산맥론(III): 새로운 산맥도의 제안" 대한지리학회 43 (43): 276-295, 2008

      5 탁한명, "지형학적 산지의 분포와 공간적 특성에 관한 연구" 대한지리학회 48 (48): 1-18, 2013

      6 박수진, "지형학적 공간구조의 해석을 위한 DEM의 최적격자 선정에 관한 연구" 한국지형학회 11 (11): 113-136, 2004

      7 손일, "산지차수를 이용한 산지의 분류 및 명명 체계의 제안" 대한지리학회 46 (46): 115-133, 2011

      8 노현우, "산지전용허가 표고기준 개선방안에 관한 연구­- ‘산지관리법’과 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률’을 중심으로" 한국농촌계획학회 17 (17): 81-90, 2011

      9 김원경, "산지전용타당성평가기준 개선을 위한 평균경사도 분석방법 비교" 농업생명과학연구원 48 (48): 49-58, 2014

      10 김종호, "산림공익기능의 경제적 가치평가" 한국산림휴양복지학회 16 (16): 9-18, 2012

      1 허진숙, "환경교육적 탐구를 통한 유역 중심의 물 환경교육 교재화 연구 - 무심천 유역을 중심으로 -" 한국환경교육학회 21 (21): 25-39, 2008

      2 박수진, "한반도 평탄지의 유형분류와 형성과정" 대한지리학회 44 (44): 31-55, 2009

      3 박수진, "한반도 지형의 일반성과 특수성, 그리고 지속가능성" 대한지리학회 49 (49): 656-674, 2014

      4 박수진, "한국 산맥론(III): 새로운 산맥도의 제안" 대한지리학회 43 (43): 276-295, 2008

      5 탁한명, "지형학적 산지의 분포와 공간적 특성에 관한 연구" 대한지리학회 48 (48): 1-18, 2013

      6 박수진, "지형학적 공간구조의 해석을 위한 DEM의 최적격자 선정에 관한 연구" 한국지형학회 11 (11): 113-136, 2004

      7 손일, "산지차수를 이용한 산지의 분류 및 명명 체계의 제안" 대한지리학회 46 (46): 115-133, 2011

      8 노현우, "산지전용허가 표고기준 개선방안에 관한 연구­- ‘산지관리법’과 ‘국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률’을 중심으로" 한국농촌계획학회 17 (17): 81-90, 2011

      9 김원경, "산지전용타당성평가기준 개선을 위한 평균경사도 분석방법 비교" 농업생명과학연구원 48 (48): 49-58, 2014

      10 김종호, "산림공익기능의 경제적 가치평가" 한국산림휴양복지학회 16 (16): 9-18, 2012

      11 이재하, "대구 산간분지 지형 인식에 대한 비판적 고찰" 대한지리학회 51 (51): 327-344, 2016

      12 이종열, "계층분석법(AHP)을 활용한 산림가치 우선순위에 관한 연구" 경인행정학회 10 (10): 301-317, 2010

      13 Ministry of Environment, "Understanding Watershed Management System" 2003

      14 Ollier, C., "The origin of mountains" Routledge 2004

      15 Conacher, A.J., "The nine unit landsurface model: an approach to pedogeomorphic research" Geoderma 1977

      16 Barsch, D., "The nature of mountain geomorphology" 4 (4): 287-298, 1984

      17 Chorley, R. J., "The drainage basin as the fundamental geomorphic unit" 77-98, 1969

      18 Dikau, R., "The application of a digital relief model to landform analysis in geomorphology" 51-77, 1989

      19 Lee, Y. J., "The Study on the Conservation of The Hanbuk Mountains in Gyeonggi-Do" Gyeonggi Research Institute 2008

      20 Korea Forest Service, "The 1st Basic Plan for Mountain Management" 2013

      21 Jeong, G. Y., "Spatial Distribution and Predictability of Soil Properties in Mountain Regions" 57 : 21-42, 2011

      22 Kwon S.D., "Reasonable Mountain Conservation and Development" National Institute of Forest Science 2013

      23 Chae, M.O., "Policy Directions for the Efficient Management of Forestland" Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements 2005

      24 Son, H. G., "Policy Directions for Rational Classification and Management of Forestland by Considering the Mountain Ridge and Valley Networks" Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements 2010

      25 Slaymaker, O., "Mountain geomorphology: a theoretical framework for measurement programmes" 18 (18): 427-437, 1991

      26 Slaymaker, O., "Mountain geomorphology" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2004

      27 Price, M. F., "Mountain geography: physical and human dimensions" Univ of California Press 2013

      28 Peattie, R., "Mountain geography" Harvard University Press 1936

      29 Gerrard, J., "Mountain environments: an examination of the physical geography of mountains" MIT Press 1990

      30 Park, Y. K., "Improvement Plan of The Forestland Conversion Permission Standard" National Institute of Forest Science 2009

      31 Troll, C., "High mountain belts between the polar caps and the equator: their definition and lower limit" 5 (5): 19-27, 1973

      32 Yoon, S. O., "Fundamentals of Geomorphology" Sigmapress 2013

      33 Kapos, V., "Forests in sustainable mountain development: a state of knowledge report for 2000" Task Force on Forests in Sustainable Mountain Development 2000

      34 Heo, K.T., "Forestry Law and Legislation" Bobmunsa 2011

      35 Dragut, L., "Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis" 81 (81): 330-344, 2006

      36 Meybeck, M., "A new typology for mountains and other relief classes: an application to global continental water resources and population distribution" 21 (21): 34-45, 2001

      37 Chae, M. O., "A Study on the Rationalization of Land Use to Strengthen National Competitiveness" 38-47, 2008

      38 Korea Forest Service, "A Study on the Intergrate Management Plan for the Risk of Landslide" 2013

      39 Kim, J.S., "A Study on Improvement of Forestland Management Act" Korea Legislation Research Institute, Korea Forest Service 2008

      40 Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, "2017 Survey on Mountain Area Utilization (Separate Issue) – Survey on Actual Condition and Spatial Construction for Topographical and Humanistic Land Use Management–" Korea Forest Service 2017

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.68 0.68 0.65
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.71 0.769 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼