This paper examines the relationship between the yoo-sik samseongseol(유식 삼성설; Theory of three types of nature of phenomena classified by the Dharma-character School) and vasana(훈습; hume or imprints), focusing on the vasana of ‘uitaseon...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107195983
2020
-
200
KCI등재
학술저널
189-203(15쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper examines the relationship between the yoo-sik samseongseol(유식 삼성설; Theory of three types of nature of phenomena classified by the Dharma-character School) and vasana(훈습; hume or imprints), focusing on the vasana of ‘uitaseon...
This paper examines the relationship between the yoo-sik samseongseol(유식 삼성설; Theory of three types of nature of phenomena classified by the Dharma-character School) and vasana(훈습; hume or imprints), focusing on the vasana of ‘uitaseong(의타성; ‘interdependent existence of things)’. As a result, we could have some conclusions as follows.
First, uitaseong(의타성) depends upon vasana(훈습) and yeon-gi(연기). Uitaseong(의타성) is the self-nature of alaya-vijñapti. It is not a self-existing entity, but a result of being bound by a relationship outside oneself. Despite the fact that the essence of consciousness is no-mind, the reason why humans can discern and recognize their own world is because of vasana(훈습) and yeon-gi(연기).
Second, the quality of uitaseong(의타성) depends on vasana(훈습). Uitaseong(의타성) has no fixed the self-nature. The essence of alaya-vijñapti is structured differently by vasana(훈습). Therefore we can live in pain through vasana(훈습) of karma and klesa [번뇌, beonnoi] or live in wisdom through munhunseup(문훈습).
Finally, the difference in action of the uitaseong(의타성) is also structured differently by vasana(훈습). Even alaya-vijñapti is the basis of the all recognition phenomena of humans, it is structured by unseol vasana(언설훈습), yuboon vasana(유분훈습) and akun vasana as 11 style of uitaseong(의타성). In this way, alaya-vijnana become the seed of world understanding and its function as yeon-gi(연기) will also be able to work.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 윤명로, "현상학과 유식론" 시와 진실 2006
2 橫山紘一, "유식의 철학" 平樂社 1980
3 이지수, "안혜의 석에 따른 유식삼십송의 이해" 35 : 69-95, 1998
4 이지중, "아리야식의 無記性에 대한 교육학적 해석" 동양고전학회 (29) : 273-299, 2007
5 이지중, "무(無)의 인식과 교육 - 초기 유식학의 관점에서 -" 한국종교교육학회 59 : 213-230, 2019
6 "解深密經"
7 "攝大乘論釋"
8 宇正伯壽, "安慧 護法 唯識三十頌釋論" 岩波書店 1979
9 上田義文, "大乘佛敎の 思想" 第三文明社 1977
1 윤명로, "현상학과 유식론" 시와 진실 2006
2 橫山紘一, "유식의 철학" 平樂社 1980
3 이지수, "안혜의 석에 따른 유식삼십송의 이해" 35 : 69-95, 1998
4 이지중, "아리야식의 無記性에 대한 교육학적 해석" 동양고전학회 (29) : 273-299, 2007
5 이지중, "무(無)의 인식과 교육 - 초기 유식학의 관점에서 -" 한국종교교육학회 59 : 213-230, 2019
6 "解深密經"
7 "攝大乘論釋"
8 宇正伯壽, "安慧 護法 唯識三十頌釋論" 岩波書店 1979
9 上田義文, "大乘佛敎の 思想" 第三文明社 1977
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2028 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2022-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
2013-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 탈락 (기타) | |
2012-02-03 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : The Korea Association of Buddhist Professors -> The Korean Association of Buddhist Professors | ![]() |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |