대학생의 완벽주의적 자기제시가 SNS중독경향성에 미치는 영향 : 외로움과 사회적 지지의 조절된 매개효과 = The Effect of Perfectionistic Self Presentation on SNS Addiction Tendency of University Students - The Moderated Mediating Effects of Loneliness through Social Support

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 대학생의 완벽주의적 자기제시 성향과 SNS중독경향성 간
의 관계에서 외로움의 매개효과와 사회적 지지의 조절된 매개효과를 검
증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 전국의 대학생을 대상으로 완벽주의적 자기
제시, SNS중독경향성, 외로움, 사회적 지지 척도를 사용하여 온라인 설
문조사를 실시하였으며, 수집된 자료 중 343부를 분석에 사용하였다. 자
료 분석은 SPSS 25.0과 PROCESS MACRO를 이용하여 기술통계 및 상
관분석, 매개효과검증, 조절효과검증, 조절된 매개효과 검증 순서로 분석
하였다.
본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다.
첫째, 각 변인들 간의 상관관계를 살펴본 결과, 완벽주의적 자기제시,
외로움, SNS중독경향성은 서로 유의한 정적상관이 있었다. 또 사회적
지지는 완벽주의적 자기제시, 외로움, SNS중독경향성과 각각 유의한 부
적상관을 보였다.
둘째, 완벽주의적 자기제시와 SNS중독경향성 간의 관계에서 외로움의
매개효과를 검증한 결과, 외로움이 부분매개하는 것으로 나타났다.
셋째, 외로움과 SNS중독경향성의 관계에서 사회적 지지의 조절효과를
검증한 결과, 사회적 지지는 외로움과 SNS중독경향성의 관계를 유의하
게 조절하였다.
마지막으로, 완벽주의적 자기제시와 SNS중독경향성의 관계에서 사회
적 지지를 통한 외로움의 조절된 매개효과를 검증한 결과, 조절된 매개
효과가 부분적으로 유의하였다. 구체적으로, 사회적 지지 수준이 평균 이
하일 때만 외로움의 매개효과가 유의하였고 사회적 지지 수준이 높은 수
준에서는 유의하지 않았다.
이를 종합해보면, 대학생의 완벽주의적 자기제시가 높을수록 외로움이
컸으며, 이는 SNS중독경향성을 높이는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나, 완벽주
의적 자기제시와 외로움이 높더라도 사회적 지지 수준이 높은 경우에는
SNS중독경향성에 영향을 미치지 않았다. 이러한 결과는 SNS중독경향성
을 완화시키는 데 사회적 지지의 역할이 중요하며, SNS중독경향성을 보
이는 대학생의 교육 및 치료장면에서 사회적 지지 자원을 활용한 개입의
필요성을 시사한다. 본 연구는 대학생의 SNS중독경향성에 영향을 미치
는 요인을 확인하고, SNS중독경향성의 예방 및 완화를 돕기 위한 개입
방안을 마련하는 데 근거자료를 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study sought to verify the mediating effect of loneliness and
social support in the relationship between perfectionistic self-presentation
tendency of college students and SNS addiction tendency. To this end,
an online survey was conducted on university students nationwide using
perfectionistic self-presentation, SNS addiction tendency, loneliness, and
social support measures, and 343 copies of the collected data were used
for analysis. The data analysis was analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and
PROCESS MACRO in the order of boarding statistics and correlation
analysis, mediated effect verification, modulated effect verification, and
regulated mediated effect verification.
The results of this study are as follows.
First, after examining the correlation between perfectionist
self-presentation, loneliness, social support, and SNS addiction tendencies,
perfectionist self-presentation, loneliness, and SNS addiction tendencies
had significant static correlations. In addition, social support showed a
significant misfit correlation with perfectionist self-presentation, loneliness,
and SNS addiction tendency, respectively.
Second, as a result of verifying the mediating effect of loneliness in
the relationship between perfectionist self-presentation and SNS
addiction tendency, loneliness was found to be partially mediated.
Third, after verifying the effectiveness of social support in the
relationship between loneliness and SNS addiction tendency, social
support significantly moderated the relationship between loneliness and
SNS addiction tendency.
Finally, in the relationship between perfectionist self-presentation and
SNS addiction tendency, the moderated mediating effect of loneliness
through social support was partially significant. Specifically, the
mediating effect of loneliness was significant only when the level of
social support was below average, It was not significant at a high level
of social support.
In sum, the higher the perfectionist self-suggestion of college
students, the greater the loneliness, This has been shown to increase
SNS addiction tendency. However, even if perfectionist self-presentation
and loneliness were high, the high level of social support did not affect
SNS addiction tendency. As a result, the role of social support is
important in alleviating SNS addiction trends, It suggests the need for
intervention utilizing social support resources in the educational and
treatment scenes of university students who tend to be addicted to SNS.
This study is significant in that it identifies factors that affect SNS
addiction tendency in college students and provides evidence for
preparing intervention measures to help prevent and mitigate SNS
addiction tendency.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 ································································································· 1
• 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적············································································ 1
• 2. 연구문제 ······································································································ 8
• 3. 용어의 정의································································································ 9
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 ······················································································ 11
• 1. 완벽주의적 자기제시 ·············································································· 11
• 2. SNS중독경향성 ························································································ 14
• 3. 외로움········································································································ 17
• 4. 사회적 지지······························································································ 20
• Ⅲ. 연구방법···························································································· 23
• 1. 연구대상 ···································································································· 23
• 2. 측정도구 ···································································································· 25
• 3. 자료분석 ···································································································· 29
• Ⅳ. 연구결과··························································································· 30
• 1. 주요 변인들의 기술통계 및 상관분석 ················································ 30
• 2. 완벽주의적 자기제시와 SNS중독경향성 간의 관계에서 외로움의
• 매개효과검증 ····························································································· 31
• 3. 외로움과 SNS중독경향성 간의 관계에서 사회적 지지의 조절효과
• 검증 ············································································································· 33
• 4. 완벽주의적 자기제시와 SNS중독경향성 간의 관계에서 사회적 지지
• 통한 외로움의 조절된 매개효과검증······················································ 35
• Ⅴ. 논의 ···································································································· 38
• 1. 결과 요약 및 논의 ·················································································· 38
• 2. 의의············································································································ 42
• 3. 제한점 및 제언·························································································· 43
• 참고문헌 ········································································································· 45
• 부 록··········································································································· 60
• Abstract ·········································································································· 69