이노비즈(Inno-Biz) 기업의 전략군 유형에 따른 동적역량, 차별화 우위 및 성과에 관한 연구 = The Study on Dynamic Capabilities, Differential Advantage and Performance Across Inno-Biz Firms' Strategic Types

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study explores to find out main reasons why some Inno-Biz finns perform well but the others are not in the same growth stage. Based upon resource-based theory, the main purpose of this research is to investigate performance differences by validating the relationships among dynamic capabilities, differential advantage and performance across strategic types.
Data were collected from 230 Inno-Biz finns to verify the proposed research model and hypotheses using cluster analysis and structural equation modeling.
The specific results were found as follows. First, two unique strategic types, called, market-driven cluster(MDC) vs. technology-driven cluster(TDC) were identified based upon dynamic capabilities such as organizational capabilities, technological capabilities, and marketing capabilities. Second, in case of MDC, marketing capabilities such as new product development competences and communication competences significantly affect technology advantage which results in high performance. On the other hand, entrepreneurship and communication competences significantly influence market position which does not result in significant performance, though. Third, in case of TDC, flexibility, innovativeness, entrepreneurship, and new product development competences significantly impact on technology advantage which results in high performance. On the other hand, any dynamic capability does not have influence on market position which does not result in significant performance.
In summary, in case of MDC, marketing capabilities such as new product development competences and communication competences were important to enhance performance through technology advantage, not market position. But, in case of TDC, technological capabilities such as flexibility and innovativeness were important to improve performance via technology advantage.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 문헌 연구와 가설 설정
• Ⅲ. 실증 분석
• Ⅳ. 결론 및 시사점
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김승일, "혁신형 중소기업의 성공사례 연구와 시사점" 과학기술정책연구원 17 (17): 54-61, 2007

2 심상규, "혁신형 중소기업의 기술력 제고를 위한 제언" 과학기술정책연구원 17 (17): 14-23, 2007

3 신민식, "혁신형 중소기업의 R&D 투자와 기업가치간의 관계" 한국중소기업학회 12 (12): 91-112, 2009

4 이병헌, "혁신형 중소기업과 일반 중소기업간 기술혁신 및 성과 차이와 정책적 시사점" 한국중소기업학회 11 (11): 79-100, 2008

5 김영배, "혁신형 중소기업 : 기업특성, 기술학습과 경영성과" 과학기술정책연구원 2005

6 유봉호, "중소기업의 학습지향성 : 선행요인과 결과" 한국중소기업학회 14 (14): 123-145, 2011

7 박주영, "중소기업의 시장지향성과 마케팅역량이 경쟁우위와 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한경영학회 24 (24): 1115-1137, 2011

8 이춘우, "자원기반관점의 연구지평 확장 방향 탐색 : 중소기업 자원경영의 전략적 과제를 중심으로" 한국중소기업학회 31 (31): 51-71, 2009

9 권순동, "이러닝의 특성과 유용성이 지속적 이용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국데이타베이스학회 17 (17): 35-54, 2010

10 이동석, "우리나라 중소기업의 기술혁신능력과 기술사업화능력이 경영성과에 미치는 영향연구" 한국중소기업학회 32 (32): 65-87, 2010

11 이동석, "우리나라 기술혁신형 중소기업 선정 평가지표가 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 산업개발연구소 24 (24): 121-143, 2008

12 양영익, "시장대응, 시장창출의 시장지향성과 기술지향성이제품창조성과 성과에 미치는 영향" 한국마케팅학회 22 (22): 41-63, 2007

13 이병헌, "벤처기업의 성장단계별 기술혁신 전략과 정부의 R&D 지원 효과" 한국중소기업학회 8 (8): 127-152, 2005

14 장수덕, "벤처기업의 기업가정신 유형화와 유형별 특성차이 : 기업수준에서의 탐색적 연구" 한국중소기업학회 14 (14): 49-75, 2011

15 윤현중, "기업가적 지향성과 조직성과간의 관계에서 시장 동태성과 제휴 다양성의 조절효과 연구" 한국중소기업학회 15 (15): 23-44, 2012

16 윤현덕, "기술혁신형(Inno-Biz) 중소기업의 기술경영성과에 미치는 핵심요인에 관한 연구" 기술경영경제학회 19 (19): 111-144, 2011

17 유태욱, "기술혁신 활동, 기술적 성과, 경제적 성과 간의 관계에 관한 실증연구 : 기술혁신형 중소기업을 중심으로" 한국중소기업학회 12 (12): 69-93, 2009

18 임형록, "기술우위가 기업 생존성에 미치는 효과 분석 -하드 디스크 드라이브(HDD) 산업을 중심으로-" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 109-132, 2010

19 이장우, "경제구조 전환기에서 새로운 비즈니스 영역의 창출 : 강소기업의 성공함정과 신시장 개척" 한국중소기업학회 31 (31): 73-88, 2009

20 Wetzels, M., "Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models : Guidelines and Empirical" 33 (33): 177-195, 2009

21 Weerawardena, J., "The Role of Marketing Capability in Innovation-based Competitive Strategy" 11 (11): 15-35, 2003

22 Upton, D., "The Management of Manufacturing Flexibility" 36 (36): 72-89, 1994

23 Zhou, K. Z., "The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations" 69 (69): 42-60, 2005

24 Matsuno, K., "The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance" 66 (66): 18-32, 2002

25 Day, George. S., "The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations" 58 : 37-51, 1994

26 Zahra, S. A., "Technology Strategy and New Venture Performance : A Study of Corporate-Sponsored and Independent Biotechnology Ventures" 11 (11): 289-321, 1996

27 Covin J. G., "Strategic management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments" 10 : 75-87, 1989

28 Conant, J. S., "Strategic Types, Distinctive Marketing Competences and Organizational Performance : A Multiple Measure-Based Study" 20 : 365-383, 1993

29 Burgelman, R. A., "Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation" Mcgraw-Hill 2004

30 Stock, R. M., "Patterns and Performance Outcomes of Innovation Orientation" 39 : 870-888, 2011

31 Tenenhaus, M., "PLS Path Modeling" 48 : 159-205, 2005

32 Newbert, S. L., "New Firm Formation : A Dynamic Capability Advantage, and Performance : A Conceptual-level Empirical Investigation of the Resource-based View of the Firm" 29 (29): 45-768, 2008

33 Hair, J. F. Jr, "Multivariate Data Analysis, Sixth Edition" Pearson & Prentice Hall 2006

34 Murray, J. Y., "Market Orientation and Performance of Export Ventures : The Process Through Marketing Capabilities and Competitive Advantages" 39 : 252-269, 2011

35 Lumpkin, G. T., "Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance : The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle" 16 : 429-451, 2001

36 Calantone, R. J., "Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance" 31 : 515-524, 2002

37 Miller, D., "Icarus Paradox" Harper Business 1990

38 Tuominen, M., "How does Adaptability Drive Firm Innovativeness?" 57 : 495-506, 2004

39 Collis, D. J., "How Valuable are Organization Capabilities?" 15 : 143-152, 1994

40 Hicks, D., "Highly Innovative Small Firms in the Markets for Technology" 34 (34): 703-716, 2005

41 Barney, J., "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage" 17 (17): 99-120, 1991

42 Teece, D. J., "Exploiting Dynamic Capabilities : The Nature and Microfoundation of Sustainable Enterprise Performance" 28 (28): 1319-1350, 2007

43 Fornell, C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and measurement Error" 18 (18): 39-50, 1981

44 Wiklund, J., "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance : A Configurational Approach" 20 (20): 71-91, 2005

45 Teece, D. J., "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management" 18 (18): 509-533, 1997

46 Eisenhardt, K. M., "Dynamic Capabilities : What are they?" 21 (21): 1105-1121, 2000

47 Leonard-Barton, D., "Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities : A Paradox in Managing New Product Development" 13 : 111-125, 1992

48 Vorhies, D. W., "Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage" 69 (69): 80-94, 2005

49 Day, George S., "Assessing Advantage : A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority" 52 : 1-20, 1988

50 Yam, R. C. M., "An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms : Some Empirical Findings in Beijing" 33 : 1123-1140, 2004

51 중소기업청, "2011년 이노비즈 기업 정밀실태조사" 2011