RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Big Data and Doing Research in the Management Discipline

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105927924

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We argue that big data should be understood as an indispensable element in a wider context of big data science that also includes machine learning and results interpretations. By addressing this wider context, we examine the differences between big da...

      We argue that big data should be understood as an indispensable element in a wider context of big data science that also includes machine learning and results interpretations. By addressing this wider context, we examine the differences between big data science and modern sciences in general and management discipline in particular. While the former adopts data-driven approach to enhance predictive accuracy, the latter adopts theory-driven approach to produce causal explanation. Data-driven approach in conjunction with machine learning strives to enhance the predictive accuracy by allowing big data to choose a set of parameters on its own under rather loose assumptions and learning processes. In contrast, management discipline emphasizes the role of theories in deriving testable hypotheses and encourages scholars to present compelling arguments without explicitly referring to data to be used for estimation at a later stage. This implies that management discipline may not benefit much from big data science in doing academic research. But we believe that big data may prove helpful for the management discipline if we carefully identify small but meaningful patterns that are not easily detected in small data. We also argue that sampling is still an important issue in using big data for academic research.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kitchin, R., "What Makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the Ontological Characteristics of 26 Datasets" 3 (3): 1-10, 2016

      2 Leonelli, S., "What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology" 1 (1): 1-11, 2014

      3 Ward, J. S., "Undefined by Data: A Survey of Big Data Definitions"

      4 Godfrey-Smith, P., "Theory and Reality : An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science" University of Chicago Press 2003

      5 Dubin, R., "Theory Building" Free Press 1978

      6 Kuhn, T. S., "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" University of Chicago Press 1996

      7 Lazer, D., "The Parable of Google Flu : Traps in Big Data Analysis" 343 (343): 1203-1205, 2014

      8 Popper, K. R., "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" Rutledge 1992

      9 Anderson, C., "The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete" 16 (16): 2008

      10 송윤아, "The Effect of a Firm’s Resource Characteristics on Strategic Alliance Formation in the Airline Industry" 한국무역연구원 12 (12): 149-166, 2016

      1 Kitchin, R., "What Makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the Ontological Characteristics of 26 Datasets" 3 (3): 1-10, 2016

      2 Leonelli, S., "What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology" 1 (1): 1-11, 2014

      3 Ward, J. S., "Undefined by Data: A Survey of Big Data Definitions"

      4 Godfrey-Smith, P., "Theory and Reality : An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science" University of Chicago Press 2003

      5 Dubin, R., "Theory Building" Free Press 1978

      6 Kuhn, T. S., "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" University of Chicago Press 1996

      7 Lazer, D., "The Parable of Google Flu : Traps in Big Data Analysis" 343 (343): 1203-1205, 2014

      8 Popper, K. R., "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" Rutledge 1992

      9 Anderson, C., "The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete" 16 (16): 2008

      10 송윤아, "The Effect of a Firm’s Resource Characteristics on Strategic Alliance Formation in the Airline Industry" 한국무역연구원 12 (12): 149-166, 2016

      11 Pietsch, W., "The Causal Nature of Modeling with Big Data" 29 (29): 137-171, 2016

      12 Holland, P. W., "Statistics and Causal Inference" 81 (81): 945-960, 1986

      13 Breiman, L., "Statistical Modeling : The Two Cultures(With Comments and a Rejoinder by the Author)" 16 : 199-231, 2001

      14 McFarland, D. A., "Sociology in the Era of Big Data : The Ascent of Forensic Social Science" 47 (47): 12-35, 2016

      15 Kappler, K., "Societal Implications of Big Data" 32 (32): 55-60, 2018

      16 Ghahramani, Z., "Probabilistic Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence" 521 : 452-459, 2015

      17 Searle, J. R., "Minds, Brains, and Programs" 3 (3): 417-424, 1980

      18 김미정, "HRM Practices, Organization Culture and Job Satisfaction: The Case of Korean Small and Medium-sized Companies" 한국무역연구원 12 (12): 35-47, 2016

      19 Madden, S., "From Databases to Big Data" 16 (16): 4-6, 2012

      20 Schmidt, M., "Distilling Free-form Natural Laws from Experimental Data" 324 (324): 81-85, 2009

      21 Leonelli, S., "Data Interpretation in the Digital Age" 22 (22): 397-417, 2014

      22 Boyd, D., "Critical Questions for Big Data" 15 : 662-679, 2012

      23 Mazzocchi, F., "Could Big Data Be the End of Theory in Science?" 16 (16): 1250-1255, 2015

      24 Kutach, D., "Causation" Polity Press 2014

      25 Bunge, M., "Causality and Modern Science" Transaction Publishers 2009

      26 Titiunik, R., "Can Big Data Solve the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference?" 48 (48): 75-79, 2015

      27 Peter V. Coveney, "Big data need big theory too" The Royal Society 374 (374): 20160153-, 2016

      28 Kitchin, R., "Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts" 1 (1): 1-12, 2014

      29 Canali, S., "Big Data, Epistemology and Causality : Knowledge in and Knowledge out in EXPOsOMICS" 3 (3): 1-11, 2016

      30 Clark, W. R., "Big Data, Causal Inference, and Formal Theory : Contradictory Trends in Political Science? : Introduction" 48 (48): 65-70, 2015

      31 Floridi, L., "Big Data and Their Epistemological Challenge" 25 : 435-437, 2012

      32 Tsai, C. W., "Big Data Analytics : A Survey" 2 (2): 1-32, 2015

      33 Russom, P., "Big Data Analytics (TDWI Best Practices Report, 4th Quarter)" TDWI Research

      34 Mayer-Schönberger, V., "Big Data : A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think" Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 2013

      35 Sagiroglu, S., "Big Data : A Review" IEEE 42-47, 2013

      36 Sutskever, I., "Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27" Curran Associates 3104-3112, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.42 0.42 0.4
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.38 0.37 0.482 0.21
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼