RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중용의 종교이론

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The theory of cultivation of mind centers around the acquisition of the not-yet-manifested mind through its manifestations. When the theory of religion is established as an element of the theory of cultivation of mind, it can be the theory of religion in a true sense. According to the Doctrine of the Mean(中庸zhongyong), the theory of religion can be regarded as the theory of the cultivation of mind. In this sense the Doctrine of the Mean itself is the core of the theory of religion.
      Among the various concepts of the Doctrine of the Mean, the concepts of the Equilibrium(中chung) and the Harmony(和he) reveal the twofold structure in which the not-yet-manifested mind and its manifestations are precisely folded in an inseparable form, and the circularity in which the not-yet-manifested mind can be obtained only through its manifestations, the media, in the word of theory of cultivation of mind. On the other hand, the Ghost(鬼神guishen) is identical with the Noble Man(聖人shengren) who is in pursuit of the Sincerity(誠cheng), the Unity of Heaven and Human(天人合一tienrenhei). But the Ghost, unlike the Noble Man, is God in Mind that activates the driving force of the mind. The reason why humans must take personal posture, not an outsider’s, is that the Ghost, the God in Mind, triggers the movement of the human mind.
      The metapraxis is constituted with the three explanatory principles such as twofold structure, circularity, and personal posture which are explained in the theory of religion of the Doctrine of the Mean. In that the theory of religion of the Doctrine of the Mean explains the cultivation of mind, it shares common concern with the metapraxis. Viewed from the principles of metapraxis, religion can be defined as the activity of the cultivation of mind which gradually confirms God in Mind, a religious equivalent of the not-yet-manifested mind, through its manifestations. More precisely, it is the linguistic symbol which mediates representational thought that we can recover the ability of God in Mind.
      번역하기

      The theory of cultivation of mind centers around the acquisition of the not-yet-manifested mind through its manifestations. When the theory of religion is established as an element of the theory of cultivation of mind, it can be the theory of religion...

      The theory of cultivation of mind centers around the acquisition of the not-yet-manifested mind through its manifestations. When the theory of religion is established as an element of the theory of cultivation of mind, it can be the theory of religion in a true sense. According to the Doctrine of the Mean(中庸zhongyong), the theory of religion can be regarded as the theory of the cultivation of mind. In this sense the Doctrine of the Mean itself is the core of the theory of religion.
      Among the various concepts of the Doctrine of the Mean, the concepts of the Equilibrium(中chung) and the Harmony(和he) reveal the twofold structure in which the not-yet-manifested mind and its manifestations are precisely folded in an inseparable form, and the circularity in which the not-yet-manifested mind can be obtained only through its manifestations, the media, in the word of theory of cultivation of mind. On the other hand, the Ghost(鬼神guishen) is identical with the Noble Man(聖人shengren) who is in pursuit of the Sincerity(誠cheng), the Unity of Heaven and Human(天人合一tienrenhei). But the Ghost, unlike the Noble Man, is God in Mind that activates the driving force of the mind. The reason why humans must take personal posture, not an outsider’s, is that the Ghost, the God in Mind, triggers the movement of the human mind.
      The metapraxis is constituted with the three explanatory principles such as twofold structure, circularity, and personal posture which are explained in the theory of religion of the Doctrine of the Mean. In that the theory of religion of the Doctrine of the Mean explains the cultivation of mind, it shares common concern with the metapraxis. Viewed from the principles of metapraxis, religion can be defined as the activity of the cultivation of mind which gradually confirms God in Mind, a religious equivalent of the not-yet-manifested mind, through its manifestations. More precisely, it is the linguistic symbol which mediates representational thought that we can recover the ability of God in Mind.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "論語"

      2 박종덕, "중용의 교육이론" 교육과학사 2010

      3 Chan, Wing-tsit, "주자강의" 푸른역사 2001

      4 임병덕, "인격확립의 초월성" 청계 295-336, 2001

      5 Jaynes, J., "의식의 기원" 연암서가 2017

      6 Renan, E., "예수의 생애" 창 2010

      7 이홍우, "성리학의 교육이론" 교육과학사 2014

      8 이홍우, "성리학의 교육이론" 성경재 / 교육과학사 배포 69-99, 2000

      9 박종덕, "본성과 교육: 심리학적 관점과 성리학적 관점" 한국도덕교육학회 27 (27): 47-68, 2015

      10 박종덕, "본능은 종교와 양립가능한가?" 한국도덕교육학회 29 (29): 21-46, 2017

      1 "論語"

      2 박종덕, "중용의 교육이론" 교육과학사 2010

      3 Chan, Wing-tsit, "주자강의" 푸른역사 2001

      4 임병덕, "인격확립의 초월성" 청계 295-336, 2001

      5 Jaynes, J., "의식의 기원" 연암서가 2017

      6 Renan, E., "예수의 생애" 창 2010

      7 이홍우, "성리학의 교육이론" 교육과학사 2014

      8 이홍우, "성리학의 교육이론" 성경재 / 교육과학사 배포 69-99, 2000

      9 박종덕, "본성과 교육: 심리학적 관점과 성리학적 관점" 한국도덕교육학회 27 (27): 47-68, 2015

      10 박종덕, "본능은 종교와 양립가능한가?" 한국도덕교육학회 29 (29): 21-46, 2017

      11 이홍우, "대승기신론통석" 김영사 2006

      12 이홍우, "기독교의 심성함양 프로젝트: 메타프락시스적 관점" 한국도덕교육학회 31 (31): 239-263, 2019

      13 이홍우, "교육의 목적과 난점" 교육과학사 2016

      14 淺野裕一, "공자신화 : 종교로서 유교형성과정" 태학사 2008

      15 Creel, H. G., "공자 : 인간과 신화" 지식산업사 1989

      16 "詩經"

      17 "續近思錄"

      18 "朱子語類"

      19 "朱子全書"

      20 "張子全書"

      21 "北溪字義"

      22 "中庸章句"

      23 Tu, Wei-ming, "Way, Learning, and Politics : Essays on the Confucian Intellectual" The Institute of East Asian Philosophies 1989

      24 Wittgenstein, L., "Tractatus Logico―Philosophicus" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1922

      25 Jung, C. G., "The Relations between the Ego and the Unconscious. Collected Works 7" Princeton University Press 121-241, 1966

      26 Newman, J. H., "The Idea of a University" University of Notre Dame Press 1982

      27 McLuhan, M., "The Gutenberg Galaxy : The Making of Typographic Man" University of Toronto Press 1962

      28 Wittgenstein, L., "Philosophical Investigations" Basil Blackwell 1967

      29 Marcuse, H., "One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society" Beacon Press 1966

      30 Mou, Tsung-san, "Fourteen Lectures on Intercommunication between Chinese and Western Philosophy" Unpublished Material 1995

      31 Fingarette, H., "Confucius: The Secular as Sacred" Harper &Row 1972

      32 Roetz, H., "Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age" SUNY Press 1993

      33 Tu, Wei~ming, "Centrality and Commonality : An Essay on Confucian Religiousness" SUNY Press 1989

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-10-22 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society for the Study of Moral Education KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-28 학술지등록 한글명 : 도덕교육연구
      외국어명 : The Journal of moral Education
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.76 0.76 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.66 1.316 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼