A Study on the Perception of Education by the Convergence of Blended Learning

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

hat the education activation is not done smoothly despite the program flow and core-core spokes that have proven educational effects of blended learning.
The purpose of this study is to examine the educational flow and methods of the verified programs and to identify the problems of activation of learning management system(LMS) and blended learning.
In addition, it seeks to grasp the perception of education practitioners and to identify practical problems to realize the blended learning.
Therefore, this paper analyzed various approaches such as learning method of blended learning, role and execution of learning management system(LMS), literature on recognition of education practitioner, statistical analysis data, and execution of educational program.
The results showed that there was a difference in perception of blended learning between teachers and students.
Teachers' perceptions and contents are as follows. First, the lack of information on blended learning, the lack of computer literacy, the negative perception of learning method, the anxiety about teaching right, and the time burden on contents production for blended learning were all unfavorable results.
On the other hand, students were expected to participate in a variety of educational programs and showed positive results for blended learning.
It is a necessary factor in current education that proper education recognition will be a basis to grow into rational and ideal education.
The results of this study are expected to be a turning point to enhance educational awareness and educational effectiveness of blended learning

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한규철, "한국고대사 블렌디드 러닝 수업의 실제와 방향" 고구려발해학회 39 : 197-223, 2011

2 송의성, "초등예비교사의 컴퓨팅 사고력 향상을 위한 블렌디드 러닝 기반의 소프트웨어교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용" 한국정보처리학회 6 (6): 353-360, 2017

3 Sin, Je-Han, "Understanding of educational media development and utilization"

4 Kim, Sun-Hee, "The Effect of Metacognitive Ability and Question Generation Support Strategy on Question Type and Academic Achievement in Blended Learning Environment" Seoul National University Graduate School 2009

5 Guen, Ji-Su, "Thanks, Guen Ji Su education"

6 Kim, Nam-Jin, "Special Education Engineering"

7 Tony Bingham, "Social Learning"

8 Barbara Jacoby, "SERVICE-LEARNIN GESSENTIALS"

9 Lee, Jeong-Gi, "Online college education"

10 Kim, Hyun, "Kiwi Education"

11 Moon, Sang-Won, "JIT management education case through online"

12 Kim, Sung- Sik, "Information Communication Ethics in the e-era"

13 Lee, Min-Kyung, "Flip Learning Understanding and Practice"

14 Jeong, Myung-Wha, "Education method and education engineering" Academician 2009

15 D. Randy Garrison, "E-learning in the 21st century"

16 Kim, Dong-hee, "Development of Blended Learning Based Native English Teacher Training Program Model" Soongsil university graduate school 2012

17 Kim, Hyun-soo, "Contract and Deontology"

18 Mark J. Rosenberg, "BEYOND E-LEARNING"

19 Seung, Hwan-Jeong, "Analysis of Social Networking on Factors Affecting Difference and Interaction between Face-to-Face and BBS Interactions in Blended Learning" Hanyang University Graduate School 2009

20 Bae, Eun-Jeong, "Analysis of Satisfaction of Classes with Blended Learning"

21 Choi, Byung-Jin, "A Study on the Development of Learning Strategy and Instructional Model for UBL Class"