RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      셰익스피어의 『리어왕』(King Lear)에 나타난 남성적 여성들

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present paper aims at studying the gender and role reversal patterns of women from the Shakespeare’s plays feminist and liberal humanist perspectives. This study assumes feminism as an offshoot of the liberal humanism, which posits a subject des...

      The present paper aims at studying the gender and role reversal patterns of women from the Shakespeare’s plays feminist and liberal humanist perspectives. This study assumes feminism as an offshoot of the liberal humanism, which posits a subject desiring to be autonomous, to be not only just free, but also to be the origin and guarantee of its own identity, the source of its own being, meaning and agency. One might say that liberals are in general committed to an ontology of the individual- a metaphysical conception of the individual as an irreducible entity endowed with an existence that can be taken to transcend the limitations of any particular culture or society.
      King Lear is very much a political play, concerned with power and government in the royal family. In the patriarchal society which defines power and politics as “masculine” privileges, Goneril and Regan strive to hold regal power committing “masculine” crimes. In the process they strengthen and maintain the patriarchal systems of men. These threatening women are characterized as monsters and devils by their contemporary misogynist discourses, and subsequently they are outcast. However, in the process of their destruction, they put into question the validity and legitimacy of the patriarchal system.
      Shakespeare dramatizes complex women as individuals of love, sexual desire, political ambition, and life-care. Goneril, Regan, try their best to achieve self-fulfillment and their agency as human beings in spite of the limits of their patriarchal system. They deny their socially and culturally given roles of docile lover, dependant daughter, and servile wife. They show the developing processes of their true self-fashioning even though they are contained in the patriarchal system in fine.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박우수, "셰익스피어와 바다" HUEBOOKs 2016

      2 Blaha, Susan S, "“You Should Be Women”, Constructions of Female Sexuality in Shakespeare’s Tragedies" U of Nortre Dame 1995

      3 Gates, Daniel, "‘The Body of This Death’: Despair and Kingship in the English Renaissance" U of Notre Dame 2003

      4 Woodbridge, Linda, "Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540-1620" U. of Illinois P 1984

      5 Eagleton, Terry, "William Shakespeare" Blackwell 1986

      6 Rubin, Gayle, "Toward an Anthropology of Women" Monthly Review P 1975

      7 Shakespeare, William, "The Riverside Shakespeare" Houghton Mifflin 1974

      8 Adelman. Janet, "Suffocation Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays: Hamlet to The Tempest" Routledge 1992

      9 Fernie, Ewan, "Shame in Shakespeare" Routledge 2002

      10 Booth, Stephen, "Shakespeare’s Sonnets" Yale UP 1977

      1 박우수, "셰익스피어와 바다" HUEBOOKs 2016

      2 Blaha, Susan S, "“You Should Be Women”, Constructions of Female Sexuality in Shakespeare’s Tragedies" U of Nortre Dame 1995

      3 Gates, Daniel, "‘The Body of This Death’: Despair and Kingship in the English Renaissance" U of Notre Dame 2003

      4 Woodbridge, Linda, "Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540-1620" U. of Illinois P 1984

      5 Eagleton, Terry, "William Shakespeare" Blackwell 1986

      6 Rubin, Gayle, "Toward an Anthropology of Women" Monthly Review P 1975

      7 Shakespeare, William, "The Riverside Shakespeare" Houghton Mifflin 1974

      8 Adelman. Janet, "Suffocation Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays: Hamlet to The Tempest" Routledge 1992

      9 Fernie, Ewan, "Shame in Shakespeare" Routledge 2002

      10 Booth, Stephen, "Shakespeare’s Sonnets" Yale UP 1977

      11 French, Marilyn, "Shakespeare’s Division of Experience" Abacus 1975

      12 Cohen, Derek, "Shakespeare’s Culture of Violence" Macmillan 1993

      13 McKewin, Carole, "Shakespeare Liberata: Shakespeare, the Nature of Women, and the New Feminist Criticism" 10 : 157-164, 1977

      14 Moi, Toril, "Sexual/ Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory" Routledge 1985

      15 Fergusson, Margaret, "Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe" U of Chicago 1986

      16 Tennenhouse, Leonard, "Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare’s Genres" Methuen 1986

      17 McLuskie, Kathleen, "Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Culture Materialism" Manchester UP 88-108, 1985

      18 Zak, Gur, "Petrarch’s Humanism and Care of the Self" Cambridge. UP 2010

      19 Brown, Elizabeth Gilliam, "Origins of the Puritan Concept of Despair" Yale U 2010

      20 McFarland, Thomas, "On King Lear" Princeton UP 1981

      21 Frye, Northrop, "Northrop Frye on Shakespeare" Yale UP 1986

      22 Muir, Kenneth, "King Lear" Routledge 1975

      23 Tong, Rosenmaire, "Feminist Thought : A Comprehensive Introduction" Westview 1989

      24 Levin, Richard, "Feminist Thematics and Shakespearean Tragedy" 103 : 125-138, 1988

      25 Kahn, Coppelia, "Excavationg“Those Dim Minoan Region”: Maternal Subtext in Patriarchal Literature" 12 (12): 32-41, 1982

      26 Cavell, Stanley, "Disowning Knowledge in Six Plays of Shakespeare" Cambridge UP 1987

      27 Heinemann, Margot, "Demystifying the Mystery of State: King Lear and the World Upside Down" 44 : 14-75, 1992

      28 Neely, Carol Thomas, "Construction the Subject: Feminist Practice and the New Renaissance Discourse" 18 : 5-18, 1981

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.11 0.561 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼