RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      양보의 형태에 따른 협상자의 대응 행동과 심리

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106868000

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Concessions are an imperative part of the negotiation process. This study employs the approach of the psychology of influence and examines which type of concession behavior induces the target negotiator’s positive subjective experiences. The theory of this study is based on Kahneman and Tversky’s (1979) Prospect Theory. According to Prospect Theory, people are more motivated to prevent losses rather than increase gains. Therefore, concessions on loss-issues will enhance target negotiator’s subjective experiences more than those on gain-issues. This study tests this hypothesis through a negotiation role-play with 100 participants and a computer-mediated negotiation experiment with 120 subjects. The data from the two studies show that, as expected, target negotiators experienced more positive subjective experiences when they get concessions on loss-issues rather than gain-issues.
      번역하기

      Concessions are an imperative part of the negotiation process. This study employs the approach of the psychology of influence and examines which type of concession behavior induces the target negotiator’s positive subjective experiences. The theory ...

      Concessions are an imperative part of the negotiation process. This study employs the approach of the psychology of influence and examines which type of concession behavior induces the target negotiator’s positive subjective experiences. The theory of this study is based on Kahneman and Tversky’s (1979) Prospect Theory. According to Prospect Theory, people are more motivated to prevent losses rather than increase gains. Therefore, concessions on loss-issues will enhance target negotiator’s subjective experiences more than those on gain-issues. This study tests this hypothesis through a negotiation role-play with 100 participants and a computer-mediated negotiation experiment with 120 subjects. The data from the two studies show that, as expected, target negotiators experienced more positive subjective experiences when they get concessions on loss-issues rather than gain-issues.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Scholer, A. A., "When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity" 99 (99): 215-, 2010

      2 Harinck, F., "When gains loom larger than losses : Reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money" 18 (18): 1099-1105, 2007

      3 Curhan, J. R., "What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation" 91 : 493-512, 2006

      4 Kwon, S., "Unilateral Concessions From the Other Party, Concession Behavior, Attributions, and Negotiation Judgments* 1" 89 : 263-278, 2004

      5 Tinsley, C. H., "Tough guys finish last : The perils of a distributive reputation" 88 (88): 621-642, 2002

      6 Tinsley, C. H., "Tough guys finish last : The perils of a distributive reputation" 88 (88): 621-642, 2002

      7 Tinsley, C. H., "Tough guys finish last : The perils of a distributive reputation" 88 (88): 621-642, 2002

      8 Allen, M., "Theory and research in conflict management" Praeger 86-103, 1990

      9 Cialdini, R. B., "The science of persuasion" 284 (284): 76-81, 2001

      10 Thompson, L., "The mind and heart of the negotiator" Pearson Prentice Hall 2005

      1 Scholer, A. A., "When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity" 99 (99): 215-, 2010

      2 Harinck, F., "When gains loom larger than losses : Reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money" 18 (18): 1099-1105, 2007

      3 Curhan, J. R., "What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation" 91 : 493-512, 2006

      4 Kwon, S., "Unilateral Concessions From the Other Party, Concession Behavior, Attributions, and Negotiation Judgments* 1" 89 : 263-278, 2004

      5 Tinsley, C. H., "Tough guys finish last : The perils of a distributive reputation" 88 (88): 621-642, 2002

      6 Tinsley, C. H., "Tough guys finish last : The perils of a distributive reputation" 88 (88): 621-642, 2002

      7 Tinsley, C. H., "Tough guys finish last : The perils of a distributive reputation" 88 (88): 621-642, 2002

      8 Allen, M., "Theory and research in conflict management" Praeger 86-103, 1990

      9 Cialdini, R. B., "The science of persuasion" 284 (284): 76-81, 2001

      10 Thompson, L., "The mind and heart of the negotiator" Pearson Prentice Hall 2005

      11 Van Kleef, G. A., "The interpersonal effects of emotion in negotiations, A motivated information processing approach" 87 : 510-528, 2004

      12 Van Kleef, G. A., "The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations" 86 (86): 57-, 2004

      13 Neale, M. A., "The framing of negotiations : Contextual versus task frames" 39 (39): 228-241, 1987

      14 Meyerowitz, B. E., "The effect of message framing on breast self-examination:Attitudes, intentions, and behavior" 52 : 500-510, 1987

      15 Nash, J., "The bargaining problem" 18 : 128-140, 1950

      16 Azmi, A. C., "The Effect of Clients’ Auditing Experience and Concession-Timing Strategies on Auditor-Client Negotiations" 25 (25): 1049-1069, 2016

      17 Raiffa, H., "The Art and Science of Negotiation" Harvard University Press 1982

      18 Cialdini, R. B., "Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood" 61 : 295-300, 1976

      19 Neale, M. A., "Teaching Materials for Negotiations and Decision Making" Northwestern University, Dispute Resolution Research Center 1997

      20 Weingart, L. R., "Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes" 1 : 7-31, 1990

      21 Loewenstein, G. F., "Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts" 57 (57): 426-, 1989

      22 Thompson, L., "Social perception in negotiation" 47 (47): 98-123, 1990

      23 Cialdini, R. B., "Social influence : Compliance and conformity" 55 : 591-621, 2004

      24 Kramer, R. M., "Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment : Effects of self-esteem and mood" 56 (56): 110-133, 1993

      25 Parks, C. D., "Reciprocity research and its implications for the negotiation process" 3 : 151-169, 1998

      26 Esser, J. K., "Reciprocity and concession making in bargaining" 31 (31): 864-, 1975

      27 Cialdini, R. B., "Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance, The door-inthe-face technique" 31 : 206-215, 1975

      28 Malhotra, D., "Psychological influence in negotiation : An introduction long overdue" 34 (34): 509-531, 2008

      29 Kahneman, D., "Prospect theory : An analysis of decision under risk" 47 : 263-292, 1979

      30 Putnam, L. L., "Productive Conflict:Negotiation as implicit coordination" 5 (5): 284-298, 1994

      31 Thibaut, J. W., "Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis" Erlbaum 1975

      32 Rothman, A. J., "Prior health beliefs moderate the persuasiveness of gain and loss framed messages"

      33 Taylor, S. E., "Positive illusion and well-being revisited : Seprating fiction from fact" 116 : 21-27, 1994

      34 Oliver, R. L., "Outcome satisfaction in negotiation : A test of expectancy disconfirmation" 60 (60): 252-275, 1994

      35 Wheeler, M., "Nonverbal Communication in Negotiation" Harvard BusinessSchool 2004

      36 O'shea, P. G., "Negotiation for starting salary : Antecedents and outcomes among recent college graduates" 16 (16): 365-382, 2002

      37 Adair, W. L., "Negotiation behavior when cultures collide, The United States and Japan" 86 : 371-385, 2001

      38 Thompson, L., "Negotiation behavior and outcomes : Empirical evidence and theoretical issues" 108 (108): 515-, 1990

      39 Maaravi, Y., "Negotiation as a form of persuasion : Arguments in first offers" 101 (101): 245-255, 2011

      40 Pruitt, D. G., "Negotiation Behavior" Academic Press 1981

      41 Thompson, L., "Negotiation As A Social Process: New Trends In Theory And Research" Sage Publications 5-36, 1995

      42 Bazerman, M. H., "Negotiation" 51 : 279-314, 2000

      43 Bazerman, M. H., "Negotiation" 51 (51): 279-314, 2000

      44 Thompson, L., "Negotiation" 61 : 491-515, 2010

      45 Thompson, L. L., "Negotiation" 61 : 491-515, 2010

      46 Brett, J., "Negotiation" 136 : 68-79, 2016

      47 Bazerman, M. H., "Negotiating rationally" Free Press 1992

      48 Smith, D. L., "Matching and mismatching : The effect of own limit, other's toughness, and time pressure on concession rate in negotiation" 42 (42): 876-, 1982

      49 Tversky, A., "Loss aversion in riskless choice : A referencedependent model" 106 (106): 1039-1061, 1991

      50 Genesove, D., "Loss aversion and seller behavior : Evidence from the housing market" 116 (116): 1233-1260, 2001

      51 Colquitt, J. A., "Justice at the millennium : a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research" 86 (86): 425-, 2001

      52 Moran, S., "Initial perception in negotiations : Evaluation and response to 'logrolling' offers" 15 : 101-124, 2002

      53 Cialdini, R. B., "Influence: Science and practice" Harper Collins. v 1993

      54 Adams, J. S., "Inequity in social exchange" 2 : 267-299, 1966

      55 Bazerman, M. H., "Improving negotiation effectiveness under final offer arbitration : The role of selection and training" 67 (67): 543-, 1982

      56 Sinaceur, M., "Hot or cold : Is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation?" 96 (96): 1018-, 2011

      57 Kray, L. J., "Gender stereotypes and negotiation performance : An examination of theory and research" 26 : 103-182, 2004

      58 Goffman, E., "Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience" Harvard University Press 1974

      59 White, J. B., "Face threat sensitivity in negotiation : Roadblock to agreement and joint gain" 94 (94): 102-124, 2004

      60 O’Connor, K. M., "Distributive spirals : Negotiation impasses and moderating effects of disputant selfefficacy" 84 (84): 148-176, 2001

      61 Gelfand, M. J., "Culture and negotiator cognition, Judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures" 79 : 248-269, 1999

      62 Slovic, P., "Cue-consistency and cue-utilization in judgment" 79 (79): 427-434, 1966

      63 Kalichman, S. C., "Context framing to enhance HIV-antibody-testing messages targeted to African American women" 14 (14): 247-254, 1995

      64 Neale, M. A., "Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation" Free Press 1991

      65 Maddux, W. W., "Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces : Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes" 44 (44): 461-468, 2008

      66 Kahneman, D., "Anoalies : The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias" 5 (5): 193-206, 1991

      67 Kennedy, J. A., "A pawn in someone else's game? : The cognitive, motivational, and paradigmatic barriers to women's excelling in negotiation" 35 : 3-28, 2015

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-02-26 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association Of Personnel Administration -> Korean Academy of Organization and Management KCI등재
      2010-02-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사관리연구 -> 조직과 인사관리연구
      외국어명 : The Korean Personnel Administration Journal -> Journal of Organization and Management
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.35 2.35 2.29
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.36 2.41 4.335 0.59
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼