RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Yields and Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided 19-Gauge Trucut Biopsy versus 22-Gauge Fine Needle Aspiration

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101605096

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: To evaluate the yields and utility of 19-gauge (G) Trucut biopsy (TCB) versus 22 G fine needle aspiration (FNA) for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). Methods: We retrieved data for 152 patients with a gastric SET larger ...

      Background/Aims: To evaluate the yields and utility of 19-gauge (G) Trucut biopsy (TCB) versus 22 G fine needle aspiration (FNA) for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs).
      Methods: We retrieved data for 152 patients with a gastric SET larger than 2 cm who had undergone endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided 19 G TCB (n=90) or 22 G FNA (n=62). Relevant clinical, tumor-specific, and EUS procedural information was reviewed retrospectively.
      Results: A specific diagnosis was made for 76 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and 51 non-GIST SETs. The diagnostic yield of TCB was greater than that of FNA (77.8% vs. 38.7%, p<0.001). The percentage of non-diagnostic specimens (suspicious and insufficient) was significantly lower in the TCB group (6.7% and 15.5%, respectively) than in the FNA group (22.6% and 38.7%, respectively; both p< 0.001). TCB accurately diagnosed 90.9% of GISTs and 81.1% of non-GIST SETs, whereas FNA accurately diagnosed 68.8% of GISTs and 14.3% of non-GIST SETs. There were nine technical failures with TCB, and the rate of adverse events did not differ between the groups (TCB vs. FNA, 3.3% vs. 8.1%; p=0.27).
      Conclusions: Nineteen-gauge TCB is safe and highly valuable for diagnosing gastric SETs larger than 2 cm if technical failure can be avoided.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Ando N, "The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis" 55 : 37-43, 2002

      2 방지영, "Procore and Flexible 19 Gauge Needle Can Replace Trucut Biopsy Needle?" 대한소화기내시경학회 46 (46): 503-505, 2013

      3 Polkowski M, "Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline" 44 : 190-206, 2012

      4 Fazel A, "Interventional endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic disease" 6 : 104-110, 2004

      5 Wiersema MJ, "Initial experience with EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies of perigastric organs" 56 : 275-278, 2002

      6 Dumonceau JM, "Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guidelin" 43 : 897-912, 2011

      7 Jayapal Ramesh, "How Can We Get the Best Results with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration?" 대한소화기내시경학회 45 (45): 132-137, 2012

      8 Wiech T, "Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions" 37 : 630-634, 2005

      9 Rader AE, "Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using morphology, immunocytochemistry, and mutational analysis of c-kit" 93 : 269-275, 2001

      10 Iglesias-Garcia J, "Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study" 73 : 1189-1196, 2011

      1 Ando N, "The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis" 55 : 37-43, 2002

      2 방지영, "Procore and Flexible 19 Gauge Needle Can Replace Trucut Biopsy Needle?" 대한소화기내시경학회 46 (46): 503-505, 2013

      3 Polkowski M, "Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline" 44 : 190-206, 2012

      4 Fazel A, "Interventional endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic disease" 6 : 104-110, 2004

      5 Wiersema MJ, "Initial experience with EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies of perigastric organs" 56 : 275-278, 2002

      6 Dumonceau JM, "Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guidelin" 43 : 897-912, 2011

      7 Jayapal Ramesh, "How Can We Get the Best Results with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration?" 대한소화기내시경학회 45 (45): 132-137, 2012

      8 Wiech T, "Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions" 37 : 630-634, 2005

      9 Rader AE, "Fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using morphology, immunocytochemistry, and mutational analysis of c-kit" 93 : 269-275, 2001

      10 Iglesias-Garcia J, "Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study" 73 : 1189-1196, 2011

      11 Erickson RA, "Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies" 51 : 184-190, 2000

      12 Jhala NC, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist’s perspective" 120 : 351-367, 2003

      13 Fernández-Esparrach G, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study" 42 : 292-299, 2010

      14 Chang KJ, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration" 40 : 694-699, 1994

      15 Karadsheh Z, "Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle tissue acquisition: where we stand in 2013?" 20 : 2176-2185, 2014

      16 Polkowski M, "Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant submucosal tumors" 37 : 635-645, 2005

      17 Dumonceau JM, "Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration: relatively low sensitivity in the endosonographer population" 18 : 2357-2363, 2012

      18 Papanikolaou IS, "Endoscopic ul-trasonography for gastric submucosal lesions" 3 : 86-94, 2011

      19 Jeong-Seop Moon, "Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Submucosal Lesion" 대한소화기내시경학회 45 (45): 117-123, 2012

      20 Thomas T, "Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience" 104 : 584-591, 2009

      21 Hoda KM, "EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors" 69 : 1218-1223, 2009

      22 Sepe PS, "EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal cell tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield" 70 : 254-261, 2009

      23 Erickson RA, "EUS-guided FNA" 60 : 267-279, 2004

      24 Polkowski M, "Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut [corrected] biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study" 41 : 329-334, 2009

      25 Mekky MA, "Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors" 71 : 913-919, 2010

      26 Song HJ, "Diagnosis of mediastinal tuberculosis by using EUS-guided needle sampling in a geographic region with an intermediate tuberculosis burden" 71 : 1307-1313, 2010

      27 Fletcher CD, "Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach" 33 : 459-465, 2002

      28 Lee YN, "Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study" 46 : 1056-1062, 2014

      29 Varadarajulu S, "Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration" 36 : 397-401, 2004

      30 Kim GH, "Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling" 49 : 347-354, 2014

      31 Mortensen MB, "Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies. A prospective study" 33 : 478-483, 2001

      32 Lee JH, "Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors >/= 2 cm in diameter" 74 : 1010-1018, 2011

      33 Storch I, "Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination" 64 : 505-511, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-12-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회지 -> Clinical Endoscopy
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy -> Clinical Endoscopy
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-06-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회 -> 대한소화기내시경학회지 KCI등재후보
      2006-06-21 학술지등록 한글명 : 대한소화기내시경학회
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.23 0.22 0.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.18 0.38 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼