1. Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is intended to search for the New Way to make teachers get out of the Uniform Supervision Ways and choose better differentiated methods based on their real needs and improve upon the methods of teachi...
1. Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is intended to search for the New Way to make teachers get out of the Uniform Supervision Ways and choose better differentiated methods based on their real needs and improve upon the methods of teaching and its quality in schools.
2. Contents of the Study
1) The actual conditions of School Supervision are measured and analyzed by variab1es.(schoo1 grade, career, position, location and sex)
2) The views of teachers about Differentiated Supervision are analyzed by above variables.
3) The Applicability of Differentiated Supervision System into Actual Educational field is investigated.
3. Design of the Study
1) In this study, I have made a questionnaire which has twenty seven items based upon three divisions of the study, and five hundred and fifty questionnaires were distributed to teachers working in elementary and secondary schools located in Tae Jeon City and Choog Cheong Nam Do Province.
2) Five hundred questionnaires were collected and these were statistically analyzed through random sampling method.
3) Each percentage of the results treated in this study was calculated throuth variables based upon each item and Statistical Significance of Questionnaire was verified by X' (Chi square) test method.
4. Major Findings and recommendation
On the basis of answer, frequency table was made and analyzed. The following conclusions are derived from through the analysis.
1) It is found that the current guidance of Supervision put much weight on regulative function and the improvement of instruction and negative reaction toward contents of the current Supervision is recorded high, so reasonable improvements of it are urgently required.
2) Perhaps the traditional supervision is applicable to every school easily but it gives teachers stresses in many ways. Peer supervision enables teachers to make progress in their teaching abilities through exchange their views but it is accompanied with many technical skill problems of the teachers.
Self-directed Supervision has the advantage of making a teacher develops his ability for himself but it is unreliable. Clinical Supervision is accounted much of a mutual cooperation among the supervisors but it needs too much time and efforts.
3) Up to date most teachers have experienced the traditional Supervision System in their schools, so Differentiated Supervision is thought as a most useful, affirmative and democratical supervision type. But teachers really want Self-directed Supervision to be applied in actual field of school educaition. It is thought that such strained sense toward the workshop class causes teachers to love self-directed supervision excessively. A new way to reduce their stresses in urgently required.
4) In conclusion, Most of teachers think that they can gain their desire for developement, better skillful teaching method and better chances of choice through differentiated Supervision, I think that more affirmative and democratic supervision type is the differentiate method and it is more applied in real field of school education.