>Ling Mengchu and Li Yu are all great masters of NiHuaBen. Compared with Feng Menglong’s San Yan, Ling Mengchu’s Liang Pai was more original. It was the first time that NiHuaBen had been assembled to a book. At first, as a new style, NiHuaBen i...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103968907
2005
-
KCI등재
학술저널
209-224(16쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
>Ling Mengchu and Li Yu are all great masters of NiHuaBen. Compared with Feng Menglong’s San Yan, Ling Mengchu’s Liang Pai was more original. It was the first time that NiHuaBen had been assembled to a book. At first, as a new style, NiHuaBen i...
>Ling Mengchu and Li Yu are all great masters of NiHuaBen. Compared with Feng Menglong’s San Yan, Ling Mengchu’s Liang Pai was more original. It was the first time that NiHuaBen had been assembled to a book. At first, as a new style, NiHuaBen is vigorous but with the time went , it became more and more stiff. Li Yu inherited and reformed the NiHuaBen style moulded by Liang Pai , and made a breakforth of the development of the NiHuaBen.Because of the influence of history books, many of the former novels of China were objectively transcribe the real people or stories. For writers, the works was only one-dimensional objective world. In Ming dynasty, the first-classical scholars participated in collecting and reorganizing SongYuanNiHuaBen and they simulated its style to write NiHuaBen. The scholars brought their emotions into the works. FengMenglong’s San Yan had made an important stride in injecting writer’s emotion. After this, LingMengchu’s mentalities were showed projecting in Liang Pai. In Ling’s works, the writer’s consciousness and mentality was still expressed unconsciously. LiYu directly inherited and developed LingMengchu’s style and his ideas and should could be seen everywhere in his works. From LingMengchu to LiYu, writer’s emotion in NiHuaBen was developed from projecting to rising.As far as novel theory was concerned, LingMengchu firstly put forward that writer should write “the rare of mediocrity” (yong chang zhi qi), but his works was contradictory with his theory. It was LiYu who inherited his idea and successfully applied it to writing. LiYu’s works came from real life and he rarely used ghosts to propel his plot. Li regarded “original” as alternative name of “strange” and posed demanding request of the writer.
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 신청제한 (등재후보2차) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2001-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.35 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.32 | 0.29 | 0.686 | 0.13 |