RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      셸리의 『맵 여왕』(Queen Mab)에 나타난 “폐허”의 비유와 서술의 문제 = The Trope of ‘Ruins’ and the Problem of Narration in Shelley’s Queen Mab

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106870016

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Queen Mab, Shelley makes a sharp critique of contemporary society through the trope of ‘ruins.’ By drawing the reader’s attention to places of past civilizations, where numerous monuments of once powerful rulers have turned into ruins, Shelley predicts the future of the oppressive powers of his time, criticizing the English government and monarchy. The trope of ruins is also extended to the realm of discourse. Still focusing on the trope, Shelley also directs a poignant critique towards the way the ruling classes circulate lying words and use them ideologically for their purposes. Shelley indicts the institution of the Christian religion as one that oppresses people with empty words about God, Hell, and Heaven. Interestingly, however, Shelley’s indictment of the oppressive powers of the contemporary society through Queen Mab, is undermined by other narrators in the poem, especially by Ahasuerus, a phantom figure Queen Mab calls out. Ahasuerus’s statements, which are a curious mixture of strong social protest, passivism and self-indulging narcissism, seriously weaken the validity of Queen Mab’s statements. This also threatens the poet’s statements of social protest in that Queen Mab is just a mouthpiece of the poet. Ultimately, this conflict between radical social criticism and its passivism never seems to be resolved in the poem. (Hannam University)
      번역하기

      In Queen Mab, Shelley makes a sharp critique of contemporary society through the trope of ‘ruins.’ By drawing the reader’s attention to places of past civilizations, where numerous monuments of once powerful rulers have turned into ruins, Shelle...

      In Queen Mab, Shelley makes a sharp critique of contemporary society through the trope of ‘ruins.’ By drawing the reader’s attention to places of past civilizations, where numerous monuments of once powerful rulers have turned into ruins, Shelley predicts the future of the oppressive powers of his time, criticizing the English government and monarchy. The trope of ruins is also extended to the realm of discourse. Still focusing on the trope, Shelley also directs a poignant critique towards the way the ruling classes circulate lying words and use them ideologically for their purposes. Shelley indicts the institution of the Christian religion as one that oppresses people with empty words about God, Hell, and Heaven. Interestingly, however, Shelley’s indictment of the oppressive powers of the contemporary society through Queen Mab, is undermined by other narrators in the poem, especially by Ahasuerus, a phantom figure Queen Mab calls out. Ahasuerus’s statements, which are a curious mixture of strong social protest, passivism and self-indulging narcissism, seriously weaken the validity of Queen Mab’s statements. This also threatens the poet’s statements of social protest in that Queen Mab is just a mouthpiece of the poet. Ultimately, this conflict between radical social criticism and its passivism never seems to be resolved in the poem. (Hannam University)

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼