In the modern capitalistic countries that pursue the idealistic state of welfare, the freedom of occupational options is considered a right for survival that is required to security the substantial freedom beyond any formal or abstract per...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76472779
2004
-
직업선택의 자유 ; 근로의 권리 ; 근로의 자유 ; 생존권보장 ; 고용보장 ; 고용선택의 자유 ; 적당한 직업 ; 직업의 자유 ; A right for survival ; The labor right ; A basic right of workers ; The security of freedom for occupational options ; The right of management ; Contents of the right to work ; The security of employment ; The freedom of occupational options
360
KCI등재
학술저널
387-417(31쪽)
2
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In the modern capitalistic countries that pursue the idealistic state of welfare, the freedom of occupational options is considered a right for survival that is required to security the substantial freedom beyond any formal or abstract per...
In the modern capitalistic countries that pursue the idealistic state of welfare, the freedom of occupational options is considered a right for survival that is required to security the substantial freedom beyond any formal or abstract perception of it under the near-modern civil law system. Moreover, it is also recognized as a basic right of workers to satisfy their ego by developing and sharpening their aptitude and capacity through job and to achieve their demands and goals to improve their environment by upgrading the social and economic status. The occupation or job in this sense shall not be confined only to certain kinds that have been traditionally accepted by society but should be comprehended as that which is, despite the socio-environmental changes, continuously requested to earn means for mental as well as physical sustenance without sacrificing public interests. Such freedom of occupational options is guaranteed by statutes in countries like Korea, Germany and Japan. Even in the USA and Canada where no security of freedom for occupational options is provided in a statutory form, it is regarded as one of inherent rights that are generally guaranteed.<BR> Today, there are still disagreements as to significance and detailed contents of the freedom of occupational options in view of labor-related features among scholars specializing in labor law. Majority of them, however, stand for the view that "the freedom of occupational options should be so extensively and comprehensively interpreted that it may encompass free decisions of workers to select, perform and change occupation, their free choice of vocational training place, free secession from working place, holding concurrent posts and standing in competitive position". In such interpretation, the freedom of business may also be categorized as a sort of freedom to perform job. On the other hand, employers who own and utilize production means are deemed to have the legal choice to employ workers with the right of management. In this situation, it is essential for labor and management to agree to unite production means and working force in compliance with the capitalistic legal system.<BR> The labor law of the modern welfare countries has the top priority to realize the freedom of occupational options by providing whole citizens with jobs to improve their economic status and realize social justice. The government should be able to offer to members of the nation job opportunities that may security certain level of working conditions and help them choose jobs that suit their aptitude and improve their ability. It must be assured further that workers can transfer to all upgraded position in return for their laborious work.<BR> It may be concluded that the freedom of occupational options, together with the national policy for realization of full employment, conforms with the legal obligations of the nation toward the labor right. It is, thus, imperative to detail the concept and contents of the right to work and prepare criteria for interpreting the positive laws by reformulating the freedom of occupational options under the contemporary paradigm.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "헌법이론과 헌법" 박영사 1999
2 "직업의 자유의 제한" 1987
3 "직업의 자유 한국에서의 기본권이론의 형성과 발전" 박영사 1997
4 "직업의 자유" 고시연구 1982
5 "직업선택의 자유와 면허제도" 세창출판사 2002
6 "직업선택의 자유" 1984
7 "신노동자경영참가론" 창작과 비평사 1995
8 "고용보장의 노동법적 원리와 구조에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 박사학위논문 1997
9 "雇用保障法の硏究" 法律文化社 1987
10 戶波江二, "職業の自由と違憲番査" 有斐閣 (174) : 1995
1 "헌법이론과 헌법" 박영사 1999
2 "직업의 자유의 제한" 1987
3 "직업의 자유 한국에서의 기본권이론의 형성과 발전" 박영사 1997
4 "직업의 자유" 고시연구 1982
5 "직업선택의 자유와 면허제도" 세창출판사 2002
6 "직업선택의 자유" 1984
7 "신노동자경영참가론" 창작과 비평사 1995
8 "고용보장의 노동법적 원리와 구조에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 박사학위논문 1997
9 "雇用保障法の硏究" 法律文化社 1987
10 戶波江二, "職業の自由と違憲番査" 有斐閣 (174) : 1995
11 "社會法理論の總括" 勁草書房 1975
12 "憲法學敎室 I" 日本評論社 1991
13 "憲法(基本權)" 成文堂 1996
14 "勞働權の理論と課題" (100) : 1976
15 "勞働權と雇用保障法" 日本評論社 1991
16 "人權と憲法訴訟" 有斐閣 1994
17 "in: Maunz/Dürig/Herzcg/Scholz, GG-Kommentar" 12 (12):
18 "Sozialrecht" 2001
19 "Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechs der Bundesrepublik Deutschland" 1978
20 "Grundriss des Arbeitsrechts" 13-, 2003
21 "Die Verfassungsrechtliche Berufsfreiheit" 1962
22 "Arbitsrecht" 2003
23 "Arbeitsrechts-Handbuch, 9. Aufl., 2000" 2000
24 "Arbeitsrecht" 1961
25 "Arbeitsrecht" 5-, 1998
타인의 계좌 또는 지정하지 않은 수취인계좌로 이루어진 지급이체의 법률문제 - 대구지법 판결(2004.1.28 선고 2003나10191 판결)에 대한 평석을 겸하여 -
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | |
2000-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.07 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.99 | 0.99 | 1.176 | 0.45 |