Effectiveness of Learning Performances According to Financial Motivation of University Students

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose - The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness in educational differences between students of the government's financialfunded groups and the non-financial-funded groups at a university in Korea.
Research design, data, and methodology - The study was conducted using a survey tool of National Assessment for Student Engagement in Learning. In total, 334 participants were surveyed, of which 290 students were participants in economic support program and 44 were nonattendance program students. The general characteristics of all of the participants were investigated by frequency analysis. The analysis of participants’ collective characteristics used independent t and f-test, and one-way ANOVA with IBM SPSS Statistics package program 22.0.
Results - The number of participating students is higher than that of non-participating students in relation to in-activities of university immersion, but the number of participating students is lower than that of non-participating students in relation to in-quality of student support. However, there was no statistical significance. The confidence coefficient of the university-immersion and student support questionnaire is 0.860 and 0.913, respectively.
Conclusions - There is no significant difference in the activities of university immersion and student support between students who participate in the economic support program and those who do not.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. Introduction and Theoretical Background
• 1.1. Introduction
• 1.2. Theoretical Background
• 2. Research Method
• 2.1. Survey Target and Period
• 2.2. Key Survey Contents and Questionnaires
• 2.3. NASEL as a Research Tool for "StrategicExploration of University Teaching andLearning Quality"
• 2.4. Research Design and Statistical AnalysisMethod
• 3. Research Result
• 3.1. NASEL Participant Status and GeneralCharacteristics
• 3.2. Status of the study on the quality of studentsupport and the activities of universityentrance for the entire survey
• 3.3. The Characteristics of the Overall SurveyParticipants' Group-Specific Activities inUniversities
• 3.4. Difference in Quality of Student Support andUniversity Immersion by Grade of StudentsWho Participate in Specialization
• 3.5. The Differences of University Immersion andStudent Support by Students inSpecialization
• 4. Discussion and Conclusion
• 4.1. Discussion
• 4.2. Conclusion
• 5. Limitations of research
• References