This study aims to examine how the two Korean passive suffixes, -tanghata and -toyta, influence the inference of emotional states toward the protagonist of an event description. Drawing on appraisal approaches to responsibility and a force-dynamics pe...
This study aims to examine how the two Korean passive suffixes, -tanghata and -toyta, influence the inference of emotional states toward the protagonist of an event description. Drawing on appraisal approaches to responsibility and a force-dynamics perspective, we tested whether these expressions influence emotion judgments about negative outcomes. Seventy-two Korean undergraduates read sentences describing disadvantage outcomes (10 verbs; 240 items) manipulating event cause (other-caused vs situation-caused) and expression (-tanghata vs -toyta). Participants selected the protagonist’s likely emotion (anger, sadness, or an open-ended alternative), yielding 2,880 usable responses (240 sentences). Logistic mixed-effects models with random intercepts for participants and items showed that the use of passive suffix significantly influenced emotion inferences in both causal contexts. In other-caused contexts, -tanghata significantly increased the likelihood of selecting anger relative to -toyta. In situation-caused contexts, -tanghata significantly increased the likelihood of selecting sadness relative to -toyta. These findings indicate that – tanghata/-toyta can influence emotion judgments in context, consistent with differences in how events are framed.