RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      위계적 질환군 위험조정모델 기반 의료비용 예측 = Prediction of Health Care Cost Using the Hierarchical Condition Category Risk Adjustment Model

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103331070

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) model, identify potentially high-cost patients, and examine the effects of adding prior utilization to the risk model using Korean claims dat...

      Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) model, identify potentially high-cost patients, and examine the effects of adding prior utilization to the risk model using Korean claims data.
      Methods: We incorporated 2 years of data from the National Health Insurance Services-National Sample Cohort. Five risk models were used to predict health expenditures: model 1 (age/sex groups), model 2 (the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services-HCC with age/sex groups), model 3 (selected 54 HCCs with age/sex groups), model 4 (bed-days of care plus model 3), and model 5 (medication-days plus model 3). We evaluated model performance using R2 at individual level, predictive positive value (PPV) of the top 5% of high-cost patients, and predictive ratio (PR) within subgroups.
      Results: The suitability of the model, including prior use, bed-days, and medication-days, was better than other models. R2 values were 8%, 39%, 37%, 43%, and 57% with model 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. After being removed the extreme values, the corresponding R2 values were slightly improved in all models. PPVs were 16.4%, 25.2%, 25.1%, 33.8%, and 53.8%. Total expenditure was underpredicted for the highest expenditure group and overpredicted for the four other groups. PR had a tendency to decrease from younger group to older group in both female and male.
      Conclusion: The risk adjustment models are important in plan payment, reimbursement, profiling, and research. Combined prior use and diagnostic data are more powerful to predict health costs and to identify high-cost patients.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Buchner F, "The new risk adjustment formula in Germany: implementation and first experiences" 109 (109): 253-262, 2013

      2 Goodson JD, "The future of capitation: the physician role in managing change in practice" 16 (16): 250-256, 2001

      3 Steinbrook R, "The end of fee-for-service medicine?: proposals for payment reform in Massachusetts" 361 (361): 1036-1038, 2009

      4 Goni MG, "Risk sharing and risk adjustment strategies to deal with health plan selection and efficiency" Boston University 2004

      5 Ellis RP, "Risk selection, risk adjustment and choice: concepts and lessons from the Americas" 10 (10): 5299-5332, 2013

      6 Van Kleef RC, "Risk equalization in The Netherlands: an empirical evaluation" 13 (13): 829-839, 2013

      7 Hall MA, "Risk adjustment under the Affordable Care Act: a guide for federal and state regulators" 7 : 1-12, 2011

      8 Van de Ven WP, "Risk adjustment in competitive health plan markets" 1 (1): 755-845, 2000

      9 Hackbarth GM, "Report to the congress: medicare and the health care delivery system" Medpac 21-32, 2014

      10 Orueta JF, "Predictive risk modelling in the Spanish population: a cross-sectional study" 13 : 269-, 2013

      1 Buchner F, "The new risk adjustment formula in Germany: implementation and first experiences" 109 (109): 253-262, 2013

      2 Goodson JD, "The future of capitation: the physician role in managing change in practice" 16 (16): 250-256, 2001

      3 Steinbrook R, "The end of fee-for-service medicine?: proposals for payment reform in Massachusetts" 361 (361): 1036-1038, 2009

      4 Goni MG, "Risk sharing and risk adjustment strategies to deal with health plan selection and efficiency" Boston University 2004

      5 Ellis RP, "Risk selection, risk adjustment and choice: concepts and lessons from the Americas" 10 (10): 5299-5332, 2013

      6 Van Kleef RC, "Risk equalization in The Netherlands: an empirical evaluation" 13 (13): 829-839, 2013

      7 Hall MA, "Risk adjustment under the Affordable Care Act: a guide for federal and state regulators" 7 : 1-12, 2011

      8 Van de Ven WP, "Risk adjustment in competitive health plan markets" 1 (1): 755-845, 2000

      9 Hackbarth GM, "Report to the congress: medicare and the health care delivery system" Medpac 21-32, 2014

      10 Orueta JF, "Predictive risk modelling in the Spanish population: a cross-sectional study" 13 : 269-, 2013

      11 Rakovski CC, "Predicting elderly at risk of increased future healthcare use: How much does diagnostic information add to prior utilization?" 3 (3): 267-277, 2002

      12 Taitel M, "Medication days’ supply, adherence, wastage, and cost among chronic patients in Medicaid" 2 (2): 2012

      13 Monroe SM, "Is depression a chronic mental illness?" 42 (42): 899-902, 2012

      14 McGuire TG, "Integrating risk adjustment and enrollee premiums in health plan payment" 32 (32): 1263-1277, 2013

      15 Frogner BK, "Incorporating new research into Medicare risk adjustment" 49 (49): 295-300, 2011

      16 Ash AS, "Finding future high-cost cases: comparing prior cost versus diagnosis-based methods" 36 (36): 194-206, 2001

      17 Evans MA, "Evaluation of the CMS-HCC risk adjustment model" Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2011

      18 Cutler DM, "Equality, efficiency, and market fundamentals: the dynamics of international medical-care reform" 40 (40): 881-906, 2002

      19 Van Kleef RC, "Diagnoses-based cost groups in the Dutch risk-equalization model: the effects of including outpatient diagnoses" 115 (115): 52-59, 2014

      20 Chang HY, "Comparison of alternative risk adjustment measures for predictive modeling: high risk patient case finding using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims" 10 : 343-, 2010

      21 Liu CF, "Case-mix adjusting performance measures in a veteran population: pharmacy- and diagnosis-based approaches" 38 (38): 1319-1337, 2003

      22 Yarger S, "Analysis of predictive value of four risk models in Medicaid recipients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Texas" 30 : 1051-1057, 2008

      23 Chang HY, "An in-depth assessment of a diagnosis-based risk adjustment model based on national health insurance claims: the application of the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Group case-mix system in Taiwan" 8 : 7-, 2010

      24 Kautter J, "Affordable Care Act risk adjustment: overview, context, and challenges" 4 (4): 2014

      25 Winkelman R, "A comparative analysis of claims-based tools for health risk assessment" Society of Actuaries 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-03-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Health Policy And Administration -> Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management KCI등재
      2013-03-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration -> Health Policy and Mangemnet KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.78 0.78 0.8
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.81 0.78 1.372 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼