고전 텍스트 독해에서 해당 전통의 문맥에 대한 이해는 필수적이다. 하지만 독자가 특정한 답을 얻기 위해 텍스트를 읽는 경우 텍스트는 원하는 답을 주지 않는 경우가 대부분이다. 이것은 ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105373103
2018
English
역설 ; gzhan stong philosophy ; circular reasoning ; paradox ; Dol po pa ; Tsong kha pa ; 타공 철학 ; 순환논증 ; 돌뽀빠 ; 쫑카파
KCI등재
학술저널
3-36(34쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
고전 텍스트 독해에서 해당 전통의 문맥에 대한 이해는 필수적이다. 하지만 독자가 특정한 답을 얻기 위해 텍스트를 읽는 경우 텍스트는 원하는 답을 주지 않는 경우가 대부분이다. 이것은 ...
고전 텍스트 독해에서 해당 전통의 문맥에 대한 이해는 필수적이다. 하지만 독자가 특정한 답을 얻기 위해 텍스트를 읽는 경우 텍스트는 원하는 답을 주지 않는 경우가 대부분이다. 이것은 고전학을 하는 사람들을 좌절시키는 요인 중의 하나일 것이다. 그렇다고 그 질문들을 굳이 유보하고 있을 필요는 없지 않을까? 필자는 타공 (他空, gzhan stong) 철학이라는 주제를 가지고 평소 가지고 있던 질문들을 던져 보고자 한다. 타공은 그것을 합리화하기 위해서 중관 · 유식 철학이 온전히 이용된다는 점에서 티벳 불교의 이해에 좋은 토픽이다. 여기서 필자는 논리적 측면에서 타공을 옹호하는 학자들이 답하고 있지 않는 지점으로 보이는 역설과 순환 논증에 대해 용어의 정의, 해석학, 그리고 경전과 수행의 관계라는 측면에서 살펴본다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
It is essential to understand the context of individual tradition when reading classical texts. However, they tend to frustrate readers because the former does not give the specific answers that the latter wishes to know. Even if it were the case, I b...
It is essential to understand the context of individual tradition when reading classical texts. However, they tend to frustrate readers because the former does not give the specific answers that the latter wishes to know. Even if it were the case, I believe that individual does not need to refrain from casting critical questions. Gzhan stong is a good topic for understanding Tibetan Buddhism in that it is legitimized by fully utilizing such Buddhist philosophies as Tathāgatagarbha, Madhyamaka, Yogācāra, etc. Here, I point out circular reasoning and paradox in terms of definition, hermeneutics, and the relationship between canon and meditation that Tibetan gzhan stong scholars do not cast doubt upon. By raising the issues from a modern perspective, I attempt to make them into stepping-stones for my future study of gzhan stong.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 안성두, "티베트 불교에서의 여래장 해석__ 自空說과 他空說의 차이를 중심으로" 인도철학회 (18) : 103-129, 2005
2 Mochizuki Kaie(望月海慧), "中觀と唯識を融合する大中觀とは何か" 162 : 83-94, 2006
3 Takada Yorihito (高田順仁), "トゥルプパの如來藏解釋" 43 (43): 831-828, 1995
4 Nomura Shōjirō(野村正次郞), "ツォンカパの空思想における空の形式について" 47 : 31-44, 2002
5 Taniguchi Fujio (谷口富士夫)., "アーラヤ識とアーラヤ智" 59 (59): 450-446, 2010
6 Powers, John, "Wisdom of Buddha: The Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra" Dharma Publishing 1995
7 Lobsang Dargyay, "What Is Non-existent and What Is Remanent in Sūnyatā" 18 (18): 81-91, 1990
8 Kapstein, Matthew, "We Are All Gzhan stong pas: Reflections on The Reflexive Nature of Awareness: A Tibetan Madhyamaka Defence" 7 : 105-125, 2000
9 Mathes, Klaus-Dieter, "Tāranātha’s"Twenty-One Differences with Regard to the Profound Meaning : Comparing the Views of the Two Gzhan stong Masters Dol po pa and Śākya mchog ldan" 27 (27): 285-328, 2004
10 Quine, Willard Van Orman, "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" 60 (60): 20-43, 1951
1 안성두, "티베트 불교에서의 여래장 해석__ 自空說과 他空說의 차이를 중심으로" 인도철학회 (18) : 103-129, 2005
2 Mochizuki Kaie(望月海慧), "中觀と唯識を融合する大中觀とは何か" 162 : 83-94, 2006
3 Takada Yorihito (高田順仁), "トゥルプパの如來藏解釋" 43 (43): 831-828, 1995
4 Nomura Shōjirō(野村正次郞), "ツォンカパの空思想における空の形式について" 47 : 31-44, 2002
5 Taniguchi Fujio (谷口富士夫)., "アーラヤ識とアーラヤ智" 59 (59): 450-446, 2010
6 Powers, John, "Wisdom of Buddha: The Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra" Dharma Publishing 1995
7 Lobsang Dargyay, "What Is Non-existent and What Is Remanent in Sūnyatā" 18 (18): 81-91, 1990
8 Kapstein, Matthew, "We Are All Gzhan stong pas: Reflections on The Reflexive Nature of Awareness: A Tibetan Madhyamaka Defence" 7 : 105-125, 2000
9 Mathes, Klaus-Dieter, "Tāranātha’s"Twenty-One Differences with Regard to the Profound Meaning : Comparing the Views of the Two Gzhan stong Masters Dol po pa and Śākya mchog ldan" 27 (27): 285-328, 2004
10 Quine, Willard Van Orman, "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" 60 (60): 20-43, 1951
11 Hopkins, Jeffrey, "Tsong kha pa, Reflections on Reality: The Three Natures and Non-Natures in the Mind-Only School" University of California Press 2002
12 Seyfort Ruegg, David, "Three Studies on the History of Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka Philosophy" AtbS, Universität Wien 2000
13 Kapstein, Matthew, "The Tibetan Assimilation of Buddhism. Conversion, Contestation, and Memory" Oxford University Press 2002
14 Takasaki Jikidō(高崎直道), "The Tathāgatagarbha Theory Reconsidered" 27 (27): 73-83, 2000
15 Blackburn, Simon, "The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy" Oxford University Press 2016
16 Broido, Michael, "The Jo-nang-pas on Madhyamaka : a Sketch" 14 : 86-90, 1989
17 Seyfort Ruegg, David, "The Jo nang pas : A School of Buddhist Ontologists according to the Grub mtha’ shel gyi me long" 83 : 73-91, 1963
18 클라우즈 디터 마테즈, "The Eighth Karmapa Mi bskyod rdo rje (1507-1554) on the Relation between Buddha Nature and its Adventitious Stains" 불교문화연구소 (22) : 63-104, 2017
19 Cabezón, José, "The Concepts of Truth and Meaning in the Buddhist Scriptures" 4 (4): 7-23, 1981
20 Brunnhölzl, Karl, "The Center of the Sunlit Sky: Madhyamaka in the Kagyü Tradition" Snow Lion 2004
21 Seyfort Ruegg, David, "The Buddhist Heritage" The Institute of Buddhist Studies 229-245, 1989
22 Stearns, Cyrus, "The Buddha from Dölpo" Snow Lion 2010
23 Hookham, Kathryn, "The Buddha Within : tathāgatagarbha Doctrine according to the Shentong Interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhāga" SUNY Press 1991
24 Komarovski, Yaroslav, "Shakya Chokden’s Interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhāga: “Contemplative” or “Dialectical”?" 38 (38): 441-452, 2010
25 Thupten Jinpa, "Self, Reality, and Reason in Tibetan Philosophy" Routledge Curzon 2002
26 Rhoton, Douglas, "Sa skya Paṇḍita, A Clear Differentiation of the Three Codes" SUNY Press 2002
27 van der Kuijp, Leonard, "Reconsidering the Dates of Dol po pa Shes rab rgyal mtshan’s (1292-1361) Ri chos nges don rgya mtsho and the Bka’ bsdu bzhi pa’i don" 14 : 115-159, 2016
28 Seyfort Ruegg, David, "Purport, Implicature and Presupposition: Sanskrit Abhiprāya and Tibetan Dgongs pa/ Dgongs gzhi as Hermeneutical Concepts" 13 : 309-325, 1985
29 Brunnhölzl, Karl, "Prajñāpāramitā, Indian "Gzhan stong pas", and the Beginning of Tibetan Gzhan stong" AtbS, Universität Wien 2011
30 Kim Seongcheol (김성철), "Michael Zimmermann, 「여래장경 재고: 불성의 9유를 중심으로」, 『여래장과 불성』" 씨아이알 97-139, 2015
31 Nagao Gadjin(aka Nagao Gajin長尾雅人), "Mahāyāna Buddhist Meditation: Theory and Practice" University Press of Hawai‘i 51-60, 1978
32 Higgins, David, "Mahāmudrā and the Middle Way: Post-Classical Kagyü Discourses on Mind, Emptiness and Buddha-Nature. vol. 1/ vol. 2" AtbS, Universität Wien 2016
33 Burchardi, Anne, "Mahāmudrā and the Bka’ brgyud Tradition" International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies 317-344, 2011
34 Brunnhölzl, Karl, "Luminous Heart: the Third Karmapa on Consciousness, Wisdom, and Buddha Nature" Snow Lion 2009
35 Deleuze, Gilles, "Les études bergsoniennes 4" Presses Universitaires de France [PUF] 77-112, 1956
36 Seyfort Ruegg, David, "Le traité du tathāgatagarbha de Bu ston Rin chen grub" ÉFEO 1973
37 Deleuze, Gilles, "Le bergsonisme" PUF 1966
38 Seyfort Ruegg, David, "La théorie du tathāgatagarbha et du gotra" L’École française d’Extrême-Orient [ÉFEO] 1969
39 Roerich, George, "Gos Lo tsā ba Gzhon nu dpal, The Blue Annals" Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal 1949
40 Patton, Paul, "Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition" Continuum 2001
41 Taormina, Michael, "Gilles Deleuze, Desert Islands and Other Texts, 1953-1974" MIT Press 32-51, 2004
42 Tomlinson, Hugh, "Gilles Deleuze, Bergsonism" Zone Books 1988
43 Hardt, Michael, "Gilles Deleuze : An Apprenticeship in Philosophy" University of Minnesota Press 1993
44 Hopkins, Jeffrey, "Facets of the Intellectual History in India and Tibet Concerning Meditating on a Mere Absence" 23 : 93-116, 2010
45 Stearns, Cyrus, "Dol-po-pa Shes-rab rgyal-mtshan and the Genesis of the Gzhan-stong Position in Tibet" 49 : 829-852, 1995
46 Hopkins, Jeffrey, "Dol po pa, Mountain Doctrine: Tibet’s Fundamental Treatise on Other-Emptiness and the Buddha-Matrix" Snow Lion 2006
47 Tsering Wangchuk, "Dol po pa shes rab rgyal mtshan on Mahāyāna Doxography : Rethinking the Distinction between Cittamātra and Madhyamaka in Fourteenth-Century Tibet" 34 : 321-348, 2012
48 Deleuze, Gilles, "Différence et répétition" PUF 1968
49 Draszczyk, Martina, "Die Anwendung der Tathāgatagarbha-Lehre in der bKa’ brgyud-Tradition gemäß einer von ‘Jammgon Kong sprul Blo gros mtha’ yas verfassten Anleitung zur Gzhan stong-Sichtweise" Wien Universität 2012
50 van der Kuijp, Leonard, "Contributions to the Development of Tibetan Buddhist Epistemology from the Eleventh to the Thirteenth Century" Franz Steiner 1983
51 Silk, Jonathan, "Buddhist Cosmic Unity : An Edition, Translation and Study of the Anūnatvāpūrṇ atvanirdeśaparivarta" Hamburg University Press 2015
52 Cabezón, José, "Buddhism and Language: A Study of Indo-Tibetan Scholasticism" SUNY Press 1994
53 Seyfort Ruegg, David, "An Indian Source for the Tibetan Hermeneutical Term Dgongs gzhi" 16 : 1-4, 1988
54 Takasaki Jikidō(高崎直道), "A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga (Uttaratantra), Being a Treatise on the Tathāgatagarbha Theory of Mahāyāna Buddhism" Istituto italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente 1966
55 Zimmermann, Michael, "A Distant Mirror: Articulating Indic Ideas in Sixth and Seventh Century Chinese Buddhism" Hamburg University Press 513-528, 2014
56 Mathes, Klaus-Dieter, "A Direct Path to the Buddha Within: Gö Lotsāwa’s Mahāmudrā Interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhāga" Wisdom Publications 2008
57 Zimmermann, Michael, "A Buddha Within: The Tathāgatagarbhasūtra: The Earliest Exposition of the Buddha-nature Teaching in India" Soka University 2002
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2014-09-04 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> CHUL HAK SA SANG - Journal of Philosophical Ideas | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.57 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.5 | 0.51 | 1.483 | 0.11 |