RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      특집/근치적 전립샘적출술에서 개복과 로봇 수술의 역할 및 비교 = Radical Prostatectomy: Respective Roles and Comparisons of Robotic and Open Surgeries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104779036

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Over the years, several surgical modifications have been incorporated into radical prostatectomy in order to improve the surgical outcome. Despite the rapid dissemination of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) through the urologic communi...

      Over the years, several surgical modifications have been incorporated into radical prostatectomy in order to improve the surgical outcome. Despite the rapid dissemination of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) through the urologic community, comparative studies on the practicality of RALP compared to open radical prostatectomy (OP) are lacking.
      Thus, it remains difficult to draw any conclusions regarding cancer control and postoperative morbidity. This review will introduce the evolution of surgical technique and the current status of RALP in relation to OP in the management of localized prostate cancer focusing on the perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes. Based on the review of literatures,perioperative outcomes, such as blood loss, transfusion rates, hospitalization duration and complication rates, all favored RALP. The positive surgical margin rates of RALP were similar to those of OP with regard to the oncological outcomes. With regard to the functional outcomes, OP and RALP also showed similar continence and potency rates. However, refinements in technique employed during RALP have improved the early return of continence postoperatively. Although OP remains the gold standard treatment in localized prostate cancer, robotic surgery and continued technical advancements will ultimately improve patient outcomes. However, further prospective randomized comparative clinical trials with a long-term follow-up utilizing validated questionnaire are needed to prove the superiority of either surgical approach in terms of functional and oncological outcomes. In addition, RALP technique will need a substantial decrease in the cost of the robotic system to achieve wider global acceptance and application.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이용성, "로봇을 이용한 복강경 근치적 전립선적출술" 대한비뇨기과학회 47 (47): 206-210, 2006

      2 이용승, "로봇 근치적 전립선적출술에서 복막 외 접근법과 복막 내 접근법의 수술 결과 비교: 단일 술자의 경험" 대한비뇨기과학회 50 (50): 251-255, 2009

      3 함원식, "근치적 전립선적출술에서의 개복과 로봇 술식의 비교: 단일 술자 경험" 대한비뇨기과학회 49 (49): 221-226, 2008

      4 Tewari A, "members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution" 92 : 205-210, 2003

      5 Walsh PC, "The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic cancer" 60 : 526-537, 1987

      6 Young HH, "The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate: a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases" 16 : 315-321, 1905

      7 Rassweiler J, "Telesurgical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience" 40 : 75-83, 2001

      8 Lepor H, "Status of radical prostatectomy in 2009: is there medical evidence to justify the robotic approach?" 11 : 61-70, 2009

      9 Pasticier G, "Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men" 40 : 70-74, 2001

      10 Rashid HH, "Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy" 68 : 75-79, 2006

      1 이용성, "로봇을 이용한 복강경 근치적 전립선적출술" 대한비뇨기과학회 47 (47): 206-210, 2006

      2 이용승, "로봇 근치적 전립선적출술에서 복막 외 접근법과 복막 내 접근법의 수술 결과 비교: 단일 술자의 경험" 대한비뇨기과학회 50 (50): 251-255, 2009

      3 함원식, "근치적 전립선적출술에서의 개복과 로봇 술식의 비교: 단일 술자 경험" 대한비뇨기과학회 49 (49): 221-226, 2008

      4 Tewari A, "members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution" 92 : 205-210, 2003

      5 Walsh PC, "The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic cancer" 60 : 526-537, 1987

      6 Young HH, "The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate: a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases" 16 : 315-321, 1905

      7 Rassweiler J, "Telesurgical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience" 40 : 75-83, 2001

      8 Lepor H, "Status of radical prostatectomy in 2009: is there medical evidence to justify the robotic approach?" 11 : 61-70, 2009

      9 Pasticier G, "Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men" 40 : 70-74, 2001

      10 Rashid HH, "Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy" 68 : 75-79, 2006

      11 Mavrich Villavicencio H, "Robotic radical prostatectomy: overview of our learning curve" 31 : 587-592, 2007

      12 Patel VR, "Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases" 174 : 269-272, 2005

      13 Ham WS, "Robotic radical prostatectomy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer is feasible: results of a single-institution study" 19 : 329-332, 2009

      14 Menon M, "Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points" 61 : 15-20, 2003

      15 Ham WS, "Robotic prostatectomy in patient with an abdominoperineal resection" 19 : 383-387, 2009

      16 Lavery HJ, "Robotic equipment malfunction during robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study" 22 : 2165-2168, 2008

      17 Ahlering TE, "Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes" 63 : 819-822, 2004

      18 Capello SA, "Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robotassisted radical prostatectomy" 21 : 1199-1202, 2007

      19 Boccon -Gibod L, "Radical prostatectomy: open? Laparoscopic? Robotic?" 49 : 598-599, 2006

      20 Krambeck AE, "Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques" 103 : 448-453, 2009

      21 Menon M, "Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience" 60 : 864-868, 2002

      22 Catalona WJ, "Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies" 162 : 433-438, 1999

      23 Poulakis V, "Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: prospective evaluation of the learning curve" 47 : 167-175, 2005

      24 Schuessler WW, "Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience" 50 : 854-857, 1997

      25 Rassweiler J, "Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases" 166 : 2101-2108, 2001

      26 Hsu EI, "Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy" 61 : 601-606, 2003

      27 Walsh PC, "Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention" 128 : 492-497, 1982

      28 Kim WT, "Failure and malfunction of da Vinci Surgical systems during various robotic surgeries: experience from six departments at a single institute" 74 : 1234-1237, 2009

      29 Sved PD, "Evaluation of analgesic requirements and postoperative recovery after radical retropubic prostatectomy using long-acting spinal anesthesia" 65 : 509-512, 2005

      30 Zorn KC, "Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies" 21 : 1341-1344, 2007

      31 Gettman MT, "Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost" 7 : 193-199, 2006

      32 Drouin SJ, "Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer" 27 : 599-605, 2009

      33 Rozet F, "A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience" 178 : 478-482, 2007

      34 Slabaugh TK Jr, "A comparison of minimally invasive open and laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy" 172 : 2545-2548, 2004

      35 Penson DF, "5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study" 173 : 1701-1705, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.5 0.57 0.815 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼