유방확대술 후 코히시브 실리콘 겔 유방보형물 파손

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: Breast augmentation with cohesive silicone gel implant has been popular but there remains the risk of implant rupture. We investigated the diagnosis and treatment of cohesive gel implant rupture.
Methods: Ten cases of cohesive gel implant rupture between August 2006 and August 2010 in ooo were reviewed in this study. The diagnostic role of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US), and operative findings of cases were studied retrospectively.
Results: The mean interval from previous surgery was 14.7 months ranging from 3 to 44 months. Nine cases were visited due to abrupt changes in texture of implants and 1 case for revision of capsular contracture. Seven of 10 cases had capsular contracture, simultaneously. We diagnosed the first case by US and MRI but only US was used in the other 9 cases. US showed discontinuity of the implant membrane and multiple parallel echogenic lines within the implant interior (stepladder sign), and MRI showed the presence of multiple curvilinear low-signal-intensity lines seen within the high-signal-intensity silicone gel (linguine sign). All the ruptured gel remained in place within the capsule and did not migrate into the surrounding area. Surgeries were implant replacement in 3, replacement with capsulectomy in 6 with capsular contracture, and subpectoral conversion with capsulectomy and mastopexy in 1 case.
Conclusion: US without MRI has asatisfactoryrole in the screening method for detection of cohesive silicone gel implant rupture in symptomatic cases. Ruptured implants were removed and replaced easily due to their highly cohesive nature.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 서론
• 방법
• 결과
• 고찰
• 결론
• REFERENCES

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Holmich LR, "Untreated silicone breast implant rupture" 114 : 204-214, 2004

2 Gorczyca DP, "The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture" 120 : 49S-61S, 2007

3 Heden P, "Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation" 118 : 1281-1287, 2006

4 DeBruhl ND, "Silicone breast implants: US evaluation" 189 : 95-98, 1993

5 Sanchez-Guerrero J, "Silicone breast implants and rheumatic disease. Clinical, immunologic, and epidemiologic studies" 37 : 158-168, 1994

6 McCarthy CM, "Silicone breast implants and magnetic resonance imaging screening for rupture: do U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations reflect an evidence-based practice approach to patient care" 121 : 1127-1134, 2008

7 Lipworth L, "Silicone breast implants and connective tissue disease: an updated review of the epidemiologic evidence" 52 : 598-601, 2004

8 Ikeda DM, "Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound" 104 : 2054-2062, 1999

9 Endo LP, "Silicone and rheumatic diseases" 17 : 112-118, 1987

10 Schnur PL, "Silicon analysis of breast and periprosthetic capsular tissue from patients with saline or silicone gel breast implants" 98 : 798-803, 1996

11 Cunningham B, "Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years" 33 : 440-444, 2009

12 van Nunen SA, "Post-mammoplasty connective tissue disease" 25 : 694-697, 1982

13 Janowsky EC, "Meta-analyses of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases" 342 : 781-790, 2000

14 Tebbetts J, "McGhan's biodimensional augmentation system cohesive gel mammary implants. Instructional video 55'"

15 Lalonde L, "Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: current indications" 56 : 301-308, 2005

16 Cher DJ, "MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: meta-analysis and implications" 47 : 367-380, 2001

17 O'Toole M, "Imaging spectrum of breast implant complications: mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging" 21 : 351-361, 2000

18 Miyoshi K, "Hypergammaglobulinemia by prolonged adjuvanticity in men: disorders developed after augmentation mammoplasty" 9 : 21-24, 1964

19 Duffy MJ, "Health risks of failed silicone gel breast implants: a 30-year clinical experience" 94 : 295-299, 1994

20 Kreymerman P, "Guidelines for using breast magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate implant integrity" 62 : 355-357, 2009

21 Lee SD, "Complications and reasons for dissatisfaction in augmentation mammoplasty- analysis of 42 cases of re-operation" 7 : 121-125, 2004

22 Di Benedetto G, "Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings" 14 : 532-537, 2008

23 Brown MH, "Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery" 116 : 768-779, 2005

24 Uchida J, "Clinical application of crosslinked dimethylpolysiloxane, restoration of breast, cheeks, atrophy of infantile paralysis, funnel-shape chest, etc" 4 : 1961

25 Bryant H, "Breast implants and breast cancer--reanalysis of a linkage study" 332 : 1535-1539, 1995

26 Berkel H, "Breast augmentation: a risk factor for breast cancer" 326 : 1649-1653, 1992

27 Heden P, "Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world's largest current experience" 28 : 531-552, 2001

28 Deapen DM, "Breast augmentation and the risk of subsequent breast cancer" 328 : 662-663, 1993

29 National Toxicology Program, "Bioassay of 2,4-diaminotoluene for possible carcinogenicity" 162 : 1-139, 1979

30 Cronin TD, "Augmentation mammaplasty: a new "natural feel" prosthesis" 41-49, 1963