RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      The Causal Relationship between Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Market: A Panel Data Analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104789311

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study applies recently developed bootstrap panel Granger causality, proposed by Kónya, to investigate a causal link between economic policy uncertainty and stock markets in nine countries over monthly periods from 2003M01 to 2014M12 (Kónya (�...

      This study applies recently developed bootstrap panel Granger causality, proposed by Kónya, to investigate a causal link between economic policy uncertainty and stock markets in nine countries over monthly periods from 2003M01 to 2014M12 (Kónya (2006 Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23, 978–992. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2006.04.008 [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®] ) Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23, 978–992). The modeling allows us to examine both the cross-sectional dependency and the country-specific heterogeneity. The empirical results indicate that not all countries are alike, and that the theoretical prediction that stock markets fall at the announcement of a policy change is not always supported. Specifically, this work finds evidence of the stock market leading hypothesis for India, Italy, and Spain, while the economic policy uncertainty leading hypothesis cannot be rejected for the United Kingdom. In addition, the neutrality hypothesis was supported in the remaining countries (Canada, China, France, Germany and the United States), while the feedback hypothesis, however, is not found. The findings of this study could provide important policy implications for these nine countries.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Bloom, N., "Uncertainty and investment dynamics" 74 : 391-415, 2007

      2 Pástor, L, "Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices" 67 : 1219-1264, 2012

      3 Sum, V., "The impulse response functions of stock market returns to temperature and precipitation innovations" 4 (4): 429-450, 2013

      4 Bloom, N., "The impact of uncertainty shocks" 77 : 623-685, 2009

      5 Brogaard, J., "The asset-pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty" 61 (61): 3-18, 2015

      6 Breusch, T., "The LM test and its application tomodel specification in econometrics" 47 : 239-254, 1980

      7 Pesaran, M. H., "Testing slope homogeneity in large panels" 142 : 50-93, 2008

      8 Dumitrescu, E. I., "Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels" 29 (29): 1450-1460, 2012

      9 Pástor, L., "Political uncertainty and risk premia" CEPR 2013

      10 Kang, W., "Policy uncertainty in China, oil shocks and stock returns" Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis 2014

      1 Bloom, N., "Uncertainty and investment dynamics" 74 : 391-415, 2007

      2 Pástor, L, "Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices" 67 : 1219-1264, 2012

      3 Sum, V., "The impulse response functions of stock market returns to temperature and precipitation innovations" 4 (4): 429-450, 2013

      4 Bloom, N., "The impact of uncertainty shocks" 77 : 623-685, 2009

      5 Brogaard, J., "The asset-pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty" 61 (61): 3-18, 2015

      6 Breusch, T., "The LM test and its application tomodel specification in econometrics" 47 : 239-254, 1980

      7 Pesaran, M. H., "Testing slope homogeneity in large panels" 142 : 50-93, 2008

      8 Dumitrescu, E. I., "Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels" 29 (29): 1450-1460, 2012

      9 Pástor, L., "Political uncertainty and risk premia" CEPR 2013

      10 Kang, W., "Policy uncertainty in China, oil shocks and stock returns" Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis 2014

      11 Marcus, A. A., "Policy uncertainty and technological innovation" 6 : 443-448, 1981

      12 Rodrik, D., "Policy uncertainty and private investment in developing countries" 36 : 229-242, 1991

      13 Kang, W., "Oil shocks, policy uncertainty and stock market returns. Journal of International Financial Markets" 26 : 305-318, 2013

      14 Dzielinski, M., "Measuring economic uncertainty and its impact on the stockmarket" 9 : 167-175, 2012

      15 Baker, S., "Measuring economic policy uncertainty" Stanford University 2013

      16 Bernanke, B. S., "Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment" 98 : 85-106, 1983

      17 Ozoguz, A., "Good times or bad times? Investors’ uncertainty and stock returns" 22 : 4377-4422, 2009

      18 Pesaran, M. H., "General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels" University of Cambridge 2004

      19 Kónya, L., "Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach" 23 : 978-992, 2006

      20 Pesaran, M. H., "Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panelswithmultifactor error structure" 74 : 967-1012, 2006

      21 Dixit, A., "Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty" 97 (97): 620-638, 1989

      22 Swamy, P. A., "Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model" 38 : 311-323, 1970

      23 Arouri, M., "Economic policy uncertainty, oil price shocks and GCC stock markets" IPAG Business School 2014

      24 Bhagat, S., "Economic policy uncertainty and economic growth in India" 2013

      25 Antonakakis, N., "Dynamic co-movements between stock market returns and policy uncertainty" 120 : 87-92, 2013

      26 Lam, S. S., "Does policy uncertainty matter for international equity markets" ACSEP 2014

      27 Michael Donadelli, "Asian stock markets, US economic policy uncertainty and US macro-shocks" Informa UK Limited 49 (49): 103-133, 2014

      28 Zellner, A., "An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias" 57 (57): 348-368, 1962

      29 Pesaran, M. H., "A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence" 11 : 105-127, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2016-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-04-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-04-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0.01
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.02 0.02 0.186 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼