신육종기술의 규제 전망 및 문제점 = Trends in the global regulation of new breeding techniques and perspective

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

‘New Breeding Techniques (NBTs)’ have been one of hot issues, since their future will be affected profoundly by national as well as international regulatory landscapes. In this review, we compare characteristics of NBTs with conventional and genetic modification, and analyze genetically modified organism (GMO) regulatory systems in the context of possible regulation of NBTs. NBTs are very heterogeneous in terms of principles, methodologies, and final products. As Living Modified Organisms (LMO) is defined in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) as an organism containing novel combination of genetic materials obtained by the use of modern biotechnology, CPB as well as other national legislations locate itself somewhere in the middle between product-based and process-based regulations.
It is also noted that jurisdictions with regulatory systems more oriented to product-based one tend to be more productive and decide or may decide to exempt site-directed nucleases-1 from GMO regulation. In this context, Korean legislations are reviewed to clarify the commons and differences in GMO definitions. Act on Transboundary Movement of LMO Act, Food Sanitation Act and Agricultural and Fishery Products Quality Control Act are three major acts to regulate GMOs. It is noted that there are differences in the definition of LMO or GM food/products especially between the LMO Act and the Food Sanitation Act.
Such differences may cause conflicts between Acts when policydecision regarding the regulation of NBTs is made. Therefore, it is necessary to reorganize legislations before policies regarding the regulation of any techniques from biotechnology are made.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Gaj T, "ZFN, TALEN and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering" 31 : 397-405, 2013

2 European Commission, "Working group on the establishment of a list of techniques falling under the scope of directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release of genetically modified organisms into the environment and directive 90/219/EEC on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms" 2008

3 Zhang-Wei Liu, "Two Components of the RNA-Directed DNA Methylation Pathway Associate with MORC6 and Silence Loci Targeted by MORC6 in Arabidopsis" Public Library of Science (PLoS) 12 (12): e1006026-, 2016

4 Schaart JG, "Towards the production of genetically modified strawberries which are acceptable to consumers" 5 : 102-107, 2011

5 Lee RWH, "Towards development of an edible vaccine against bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis using transgenic white clover expressing a Mannheimia haemolytica A1 leukotoxin 50 fusion protein" 69 : 5786-5793, 2001

6 Schmidt S, "To regulate or not to regulate: Current legal status for gene-edited crops"

7 Wight AJ, "Strict EU ruling on gene-edited crops squeezes science" 563 : 15-16, 2018

8 Wang Y, "Simultaneous editing of three homeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew" 32 : 947-951, 2014

9 USDA, "Secretary Perdue issues USDA statement on plant breeding innovation. Press Release No 0070.18"

10 SAGP, "Secretaria de agricultura ganaderia Y pesca, resolution"

11 Bunge J, "Scientists in China race to edit crop genes, sowing unease in US" Wall Street Journal

12 Dirks R, "Reverse breeding: a novel breeding approach based on engineered meiosis" 7 : 837-845, 2009

13 Kumari P, "Reverse breeding: Accelerating innovation in plant breeding" (SP1) : 1811-1813, 2018

14 EPSO, "Reverse breeding. Meet the parent. Crop Genetic Improvement Techniques Fact Sheet"

15 WIPO, "Republic of Korea. Act on transboundary movement, etc., of living modified organisms (Act No.6448 of March 28, 2001, as amended up to Act No. 12833 of November 19, 2014)"

16 Lassoued R, "Regulatory uncertainty around new breeding techniques" 9 : 1-10, 2018

17 Abdullah MFF, "Regulatory issues on genome editing in Malaysia" Korean Biosafety Clearing House 91-103, 2018

18 Whelen AI, "Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina" 6 : 253-265, 2015

19 Tachikawa M, "Regulatory discussions and consumer perceptions on genome editing in Japan" Korean Biosafety Clearing House 239-255, 2018

20 Kahrmann J, "Regulation of genome editing in Europe and Germany" Korean Biosafety Clearing House 59-71, 2018

21 CBGP UPM-INIA, "Regulating genome edited organisms as GMOs has negative consequences for agriculture, society and economy"

22 USDA APHIS, "Regulated article letters of inquiry"

23 Kim JY, "Recent progress in CRISPR-based genome editing techniques and domestic research status" 31-54, 2018

24 Eliezer E. Goldschmidt, "Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications" Frontiers Media SA 5 : 2014

25 Aimee Malzahn, "Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR" Springer Nature 7 (7): 2017

26 Atanassova A, "Plant breeding innovation: A global perspective" 95 : 8-16, 2018

27 Court of Justice of the European Union, "Organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMOs and are, in principle, subject to the obligations laid down by the GMO Directive. Press Release No 111/18"

28 Schaart JG, "Opportunities for products of new plant breeding techniques" 21 : 438-449, 2016

29 Sauer NJ, "Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis for precision gene editing" 14 : 496-502, 2016

30 COGEM, "New techniques in plant biotechnology" COGEM 2006

31 European Commission, "New techniques in agricultural biotechnology" Scientific Advisory Mechanism, High Level Group of Scientific Advisors 2017

32 Lusser M, "New plant breeding techniques: state-of-the-art and prospects for commercial development" EC JRC 2011

33 Koh HJ, "Management measures of plant varieties by the application of genome editing techniques" 71-96, 2018

34 USDA FAS, "Israel agricultural biotechnology annual 2017"

35 Clasen BM, "Improving cold storage and processing traits in potato through targeted gene knockout" 14 : 169-176, 2016

36 Kim YG, "Hybrid restriction enzymes:zinc finger fusions to FokI cleavage domain" 93 : 1156-1160, 1996

37 ISAAA, "Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2017: Biotech crop adoption surges as economic benefits accumulate in 22 years" ISAAA 2017

38 Carrol D, "Genome engineering with zinc-finger nucleases" 188 : 773-782, 2011

39 Rahman SJ, "Genome editing technologies: Existing monitoring and compliance protocols for confined field trials of GE crops in India" Korean Biosafety Clearing House 131-142, 2018

40 Kamburova VS, "Genome editing in plants: An overview of tools and application" 2017

41 Petolino JF, "Genome editing in plants via designed zinc finger nucleases" 51 : 1-8, 2015

42 Steinbrecher RA, "Genetic engineering in plants and the “new breeding techniques (NBTs)”, Inherent risks and the need to regulate" EcoNexus Briefing

43 Lindsey Perkin, "Gene Disruption Technologies Have the Potential to Transform Stored Product Insect Pest Control" MDPI AG 7 (7): 46-, 2016

44 KFDA, "Food sanitation act (Act No. 15277, December 19, 2017)"

45 Schurman L, "Fighting “frankenfoods”: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in western Europe" 51 : 243-268, 2004

46 Gupta RM, "Expanding the genetic editing tool kit:ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9" 124 : 4154-4161, 2017

47 UK, "Evidence check: GM and gene editing-Government statement"

48 Hall SS, "Editing the mushroom" Scientific America

49 Zachary L. Demorest, "Direct stacking of sequence-specific nuclease-induced mutations to produce high oleic and low linolenic soybean oil" Springer Nature 16 (16): 2016

50 Thomas D. Kost, "Development of the First Cisgenic Apple with Increased Resistance to Fire Blight" Public Library of Science (PLoS) 10 (10): e0143980-, 2015

51 Jo K-W, "Development of late blight resistant potatoes by cisgene stacking" 14 : 50-, 2014

52 Lusser M, "Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding" 30 : 231-239, 2012

53 Nuijten E, "Concepts and strategies of organic plant breeding in light of novel breeding techniques" 9 : 18-, 2017

54 Lusser M, "Comparative regulatory approaches for groups of new plant breeding techniques" 30 : 437-446, 2013

55 Espinoza c, "Cisgenesis and intragenesis: New tools for improving crops" 46 : 323-331, 2013

56 Biosafety Clearing House, "Cartagena protocol on biosafety"

57 Smyth SJ, "Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops" 8 : 35-41, 2017

58 Bomgardner MM, "CRISPR: A new toolbox for better crops" 95 : 30-34, 2017

59 Mitchell H, "Australian regulation, risk assessment and genome edited organisms" Korean Biosafety Clearing House 261-276, 2018

60 Haft DH, "Aguild of 45CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein families and multiple CRISPR/Cas subtypes exist in prokaryotic genomes" 1 : 474-483, 2014

61 MAFRA, "Agricultural and fishery products quality control act (Act No 14483, December 27, 2016)"

62 Ishii T, "A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops" 8 : 44-56, 2017

63 Steffi Fritsche, "A New Zealand Perspective on the Application and Regulation of Gene Editing" Frontiers Media SA 9 : 2018