RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    노동운동의 이론적 모형  :  퍼얼만의 이론을 중심으로 Cheifly on Perlman's Theory = A Theoretical Model of Labor Movement

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45019223

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Theorizing about labor movement has always been an elusive, complex task, in great part because the labor movement has taken widely differnt forms historically, even in the same country and takes different forms currently in various parts of the world.
    Thus, This paper attempts to help stimulate our thinking about complex labor theory and to confirm some of nature of labor movement theory by analysing one of the most important labor theorists, Perlman's theoretical structure of labor movement.
    He developed a theoretical model of businesss unionism which idiologically accepts the capitalist system and bases its strategies on an assumption of the job consciousness of workers, in contrast with many european movements which reject the capitalist system and base their strategies on an assumption of the class consciousness of workers.
    His core logic of explaining labor movement are as follows ;
    1) he rejects the idea of class consciousness as an explanation for the origin of trade unions and substitutes for it the notion of "job consciousness". It is not until the manualists became aware of a scarcity of opportunity, Perlman maintains, that they band together into unions for the purpose of protecting their job and apportioning available employment opportunities on an equitable basis.
    2) He sees the funcion and object of labor movement as an interest group for workers within competitive market economy ; the trade unions function to increase labor's bargaining power, partically over matters of "job security and control". He, therefore, rejects any kind of wide ranging political action by unions which is not directly related to their economic function
    3) He provides three-factor system shaping the development and form of labor movements ; the resistance power of capitalism, the degree of dominance over the labor movements by the intellectual mentality and the degree fo maturity of trade union.
    4) and thus, he regards future of the labor movement as an optimistic view.
    I think that his first, such a series of comprehensive and systematic explantion in the field of labor theory would enable us to understand the important aspects of nature, motivation, development and forms of labor movement whatever it may have some of its weakenss.
    번역하기

    Theorizing about labor movement has always been an elusive, complex task, in great part because the labor movement has taken widely differnt forms historically, even in the same country and takes different forms currently in various parts of the world...

    Theorizing about labor movement has always been an elusive, complex task, in great part because the labor movement has taken widely differnt forms historically, even in the same country and takes different forms currently in various parts of the world.
    Thus, This paper attempts to help stimulate our thinking about complex labor theory and to confirm some of nature of labor movement theory by analysing one of the most important labor theorists, Perlman's theoretical structure of labor movement.
    He developed a theoretical model of businesss unionism which idiologically accepts the capitalist system and bases its strategies on an assumption of the job consciousness of workers, in contrast with many european movements which reject the capitalist system and base their strategies on an assumption of the class consciousness of workers.
    His core logic of explaining labor movement are as follows ;
    1) he rejects the idea of class consciousness as an explanation for the origin of trade unions and substitutes for it the notion of "job consciousness". It is not until the manualists became aware of a scarcity of opportunity, Perlman maintains, that they band together into unions for the purpose of protecting their job and apportioning available employment opportunities on an equitable basis.
    2) He sees the funcion and object of labor movement as an interest group for workers within competitive market economy ; the trade unions function to increase labor's bargaining power, partically over matters of "job security and control". He, therefore, rejects any kind of wide ranging political action by unions which is not directly related to their economic function
    3) He provides three-factor system shaping the development and form of labor movements ; the resistance power of capitalism, the degree of dominance over the labor movements by the intellectual mentality and the degree fo maturity of trade union.
    4) and thus, he regards future of the labor movement as an optimistic view.
    I think that his first, such a series of comprehensive and systematic explantion in the field of labor theory would enable us to understand the important aspects of nature, motivation, development and forms of labor movement whatever it may have some of its weakenss.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 노동운동의 이론적 논의
    • Ⅲ. 퍼얼만의 이론적 구조
    • Ⅳ. 퍼얼만 이론의 함의
    • Ⅴ. 맺는말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 노동운동의 이론적 논의
    • Ⅲ. 퍼얼만의 이론적 구조
    • Ⅳ. 퍼얼만 이론의 함의
    • Ⅴ. 맺는말
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼