RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중국 마르크스주의 역사학의 민족담론 분석― 뤼전위(呂振羽)의 민족사 연구를 중심으로 ― = An Analysis on the National Discourse in Chinese Marxist History— Focusing on the Study of National History by Lu Zhenyu(呂振羽) —

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108892397

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper attempts to analyze how the national issues dealt within the Chinese Marxist historiography were characterized by examining Lu Zhenyu's researches on national history. Experiencing the Social history debates in the 1930s, Lu Zhenyu converted to Marxism and joined the Chinese Communist Party and tried to institutionalize Marxist history. Throughout the Anti-Japanese War and the Chinese Civil War, and even after the establishment of the People's Republic of China, his stance was in line with the Chinese Communist Party and Mao Zedong's policies on the nation. Opposing Kuomintang and Japan's national discourses, Lu accused them of being fascist and criticized their imperialistic view point based on lineage theory and race theory. Unlike Chiang Kai-shek, Lu stood for equality between ethnic groups and emphasized the role of minorities in history. This can be understood to have formed a discourse system by incorporating the process of establishing the Chinese Communist Party's perspectives of the national issue in regard to Stalin's national issue.
      Although his book, A Brief History of Chinese people, was an introductory book, it took the role of the ethnic groups in the development of Chinese history as an economic community based on the Marxist approach. It was also a pioneering effort to systematize and institutionalize researches through supplementation of historical materials and actual surveys. He particularly paid attention to how the economic and social structures of each ethnic group were related in the five stages of Marx’s historical development theory. This led to the explanation of each ethnic group’s contribution in the economic growth. Lu believed that assimilation could promote the historical development process when the technology possessed by the Han people(漢族) and the resources of minorities were combined. He also saw positive aspects of wars on the economic development process. Likewise, from his perspective, the role of ethnicity could be evaluated positively when contributing on economic development. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, he served as a member of the Nationality Committee and found political support among high-ranking officials. Especially, with the encouragement of Zhou Enlai, Lu's study of national history moved toward presenting historical grounds for supporting regional autonomy.
      National convergence was explained based on the assimilation process between ethnic groups, highlighting the positive aspects of the mixed habitation between the Han Chinese and ethnic minorities, and presenting this as the historical basis for why federalism could not be implemented in China. Even though he had stressed ethnic equity during the anti-Japanese period, after the establishment of the People's Republic of China, it became clearer that his emphasis moved to unity of all the ethnic groups within the territory rather than national independence and he asserted the inevitability of regional autonomy.
      Overall, Lu's study on national history showed an example of Marxist historiography's response to national issues in the process of revolution and nation-building. In the political landscape of anti-Japanese and civil war, he tried to form an academically leading discourse on national issues and to suggest a path for research based on the Marxist perspective. This was accomplished within the framework of the institutionalization and systemization of Marxist history. However, it was difficult to maintain the academic achievements that embodied the perspective of ethnic equity during the anti-Japanese war and civil war without finding a way to resolve the tension arising from the incongruity between Marxist theory and Chinese reality.
      번역하기

      This paper attempts to analyze how the national issues dealt within the Chinese Marxist historiography were characterized by examining Lu Zhenyu's researches on national history. Experiencing the Social history debates in the 1930s, Lu Zhenyu converte...

      This paper attempts to analyze how the national issues dealt within the Chinese Marxist historiography were characterized by examining Lu Zhenyu's researches on national history. Experiencing the Social history debates in the 1930s, Lu Zhenyu converted to Marxism and joined the Chinese Communist Party and tried to institutionalize Marxist history. Throughout the Anti-Japanese War and the Chinese Civil War, and even after the establishment of the People's Republic of China, his stance was in line with the Chinese Communist Party and Mao Zedong's policies on the nation. Opposing Kuomintang and Japan's national discourses, Lu accused them of being fascist and criticized their imperialistic view point based on lineage theory and race theory. Unlike Chiang Kai-shek, Lu stood for equality between ethnic groups and emphasized the role of minorities in history. This can be understood to have formed a discourse system by incorporating the process of establishing the Chinese Communist Party's perspectives of the national issue in regard to Stalin's national issue.
      Although his book, A Brief History of Chinese people, was an introductory book, it took the role of the ethnic groups in the development of Chinese history as an economic community based on the Marxist approach. It was also a pioneering effort to systematize and institutionalize researches through supplementation of historical materials and actual surveys. He particularly paid attention to how the economic and social structures of each ethnic group were related in the five stages of Marx’s historical development theory. This led to the explanation of each ethnic group’s contribution in the economic growth. Lu believed that assimilation could promote the historical development process when the technology possessed by the Han people(漢族) and the resources of minorities were combined. He also saw positive aspects of wars on the economic development process. Likewise, from his perspective, the role of ethnicity could be evaluated positively when contributing on economic development. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, he served as a member of the Nationality Committee and found political support among high-ranking officials. Especially, with the encouragement of Zhou Enlai, Lu's study of national history moved toward presenting historical grounds for supporting regional autonomy.
      National convergence was explained based on the assimilation process between ethnic groups, highlighting the positive aspects of the mixed habitation between the Han Chinese and ethnic minorities, and presenting this as the historical basis for why federalism could not be implemented in China. Even though he had stressed ethnic equity during the anti-Japanese period, after the establishment of the People's Republic of China, it became clearer that his emphasis moved to unity of all the ethnic groups within the territory rather than national independence and he asserted the inevitability of regional autonomy.
      Overall, Lu's study on national history showed an example of Marxist historiography's response to national issues in the process of revolution and nation-building. In the political landscape of anti-Japanese and civil war, he tried to form an academically leading discourse on national issues and to suggest a path for research based on the Marxist perspective. This was accomplished within the framework of the institutionalization and systemization of Marxist history. However, it was difficult to maintain the academic achievements that embodied the perspective of ethnic equity during the anti-Japanese war and civil war without finding a way to resolve the tension arising from the incongruity between Marxist theory and Chinese reality.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 宋淑琴, "「呂振羽與“南方抗大”—塘田戰時講學院" (7) : 2014

      2 아리프 딜릭, "혁명과 역사 : 중국 마르크스주의 역사학의 기원 1919~1937" 산지니 2016

      3 유용태, "개혁개방시기 中國의 通史・文明史 편찬과 그 인식체계 ― 사회형태설에서 다민족국가론으로 ―" 동양사학회 (147) : 441-482, 2019

      4 康士坦・丁諾夫 著, "馬克思列寧主義與民族殖民地問題" 人民出版社 1951

      5 周競紅, "馬克思主義理論與民族史書寫—重讀呂振羽《中國民族簡史》" (2) : 2019

      6 沈桂萍, "馬克思主義民族觀與黨的民族政策" 中央編譯出版社 2007

      7 青覺著, "馬克思主義民族觀的形成與發展" 民族出版社 2004

      8 施建雄, "馬克思主義史學家呂振羽民族史觀的確立與發展" (1) : 1994

      9 桂遵義, "馬克思主義史學在中國" 山東人民出版社 1992

      10 鄭大華, "近代中國革命進程中馬克思主義史學的民族化轉向" (7) : 2019

      1 宋淑琴, "「呂振羽與“南方抗大”—塘田戰時講學院" (7) : 2014

      2 아리프 딜릭, "혁명과 역사 : 중국 마르크스주의 역사학의 기원 1919~1937" 산지니 2016

      3 유용태, "개혁개방시기 中國의 通史・文明史 편찬과 그 인식체계 ― 사회형태설에서 다민족국가론으로 ―" 동양사학회 (147) : 441-482, 2019

      4 康士坦・丁諾夫 著, "馬克思列寧主義與民族殖民地問題" 人民出版社 1951

      5 周競紅, "馬克思主義理論與民族史書寫—重讀呂振羽《中國民族簡史》" (2) : 2019

      6 沈桂萍, "馬克思主義民族觀與黨的民族政策" 中央編譯出版社 2007

      7 青覺著, "馬克思主義民族觀的形成與發展" 民族出版社 2004

      8 施建雄, "馬克思主義史學家呂振羽民族史觀的確立與發展" (1) : 1994

      9 桂遵義, "馬克思主義史學在中國" 山東人民出版社 1992

      10 鄭大華, "近代中國革命進程中馬克思主義史學的民族化轉向" (7) : 2019

      11 徐黎麗, "論民族關系與民族關系問題" 民族出版社 2005

      12 劉力平, "論呂振羽史學研究的特質" (2) : 2005

      13 馬俊毅, "論二戰中的極端民族主義和種族主義—紀念世界反法西斯戰爭及抗日戰爭勝利60周年" (5) : 2005

      14 오병수, "范文瀾의 학술궤적과 『中國通史簡編』 저술 배경 ‒중화인민공화국의 흠정사서는 어떻게 탄생했나?‒" 역사교육연구회 (165) : 47-90, 2023

      15 莊福齡, "簡明馬克思主義史" 人民出版社 1999

      16 呂振羽, "簡明中國史 上冊" 人民出版社 1959

      17 李大生, "發揚老一輩馬克思主義曆史學家的優良傳統——重讀《簡明中國通史" (4) : 1991

      18 陳其泰, "當代中國馬克思主義史學家關於民族問題的理論" (1) : 2007

      19 戴開柱, "略論呂振羽的民族文化遺產繼承觀及其現實意義" (6) : 2003

      20 金炳鎬, "民族關系理論通論" 中央民族大學出版社 2007

      21 杜玉亭, "民族識別與馬克思主義中國化—基諾人識別50年的曆史哲學視角" (6) : 2009

      22 李珍, "民族融合與民族史觀" (9) : 2004

      23 吉爾, "民族與民族主義" 三聯書店 2005

      24 黃興濤, "民族自覺與符號認同 : "中華民族"觀念萌生與確立的曆史考察" (創刊) : 2002

      25 中共中央統戰部, "民族問題文獻滙編" 中共中央黨校出版社 1991

      26 陳育寧, "民族史學概論" 寧夏人民出版社 2006

      27 黃克武, "民族主義的再發現 : 抗戰時期中國朝野對"中華民族"的討論" (4) : 2016

      28 董夢婷, "民族主義在中國馬克思主義史學中的建構(1930-1949)—以范文瀾, 呂振羽,翦伯贊爲例" (1) : 2022

      29 楊天通, "抗戰時期馬克思主義民族史的理論與實踐" (4) : 2016

      30 於文善, "抗戰時期重慶馬克思主義知識群體“學術中國化”研究特點與啟示" (4) : 2022

      31 於文善, "抗戰時期重慶馬克思主義史學研究" 華東師範大學 2011

      32 戴開柱, "抗戰時期呂振羽在重慶的革命活動述論" (6) : 2002

      33 楊淩林, "抗戰時期中國馬克思主義史學的發展" 西南大學 2006

      34 榮孟源, "悼念呂振羽先生" (4) : 1983

      35 王柯, "從"天下"國家到民族國家" 上海人民出版社 2022

      36 程鵬宇, "建國前馬克思主義史學的中國史觀" 西北大學 2013

      37 宋逸平, "左翼史家的少數民族曆史敘事(1930-1949)" 華東師範大學 2020

      38 李翹秀, "學術與政治之間:以20世紀30,40年代的馬克思主義民族史研究爲中心的考察" 中共中央黨校 2018

      39 陳抗生, "呂振羽論治學" (2) : 2010

      40 劉茂林, "呂振羽評傳" 社會科學文獻出版社 1990

      41 汪書路, "呂振羽與馬克思主義中國化" 武漢理工大學 2019

      42 朱發建, "呂振羽與中國社會史論戰" (6) : 1998

      43 戴開柱, "呂振羽與《新東方》" (1) : 2014

      44 孫冬華, "呂振羽的馬克思主義信仰確立路徑及現實啟示" (4) : 2022

      45 蔣昌宏, "呂振羽的中華民族曆史觀及其現實啟示" (3) : 2022

      46 劉開軍, "呂振羽晚年詠史詩中的民族思想與史學史理論" (3) : 2011

      47 劉鵬程, "呂振羽早期思想研究 —以《村治月刊》和《新東方》爲例" 清華大學 2012

      48 羅玉嬌, "呂振羽對唯物史觀的運用研究" 西南科技大學 2021

      49 梁銀妹, "呂振羽對亞細亞生產方式研究發展的呈現與原因" (1) : 2012

      50 朱政惠, "呂振羽學術思想評傳" 北京圖書館出版社 2000

      51 朱政惠, "呂振羽和他的曆史學研究" 湖南教育出版社 1992

      52 唐光懷, "呂振羽史學研究的馬克思主義特質探析" (4) : 2006

      53 呂振羽, "呂振羽全集 全 10卷" 人民出版社 2014

      54 朱發建, "呂振羽傳" 湖南師範大學出版社 1999

      55 彭忠信, "呂振羽倫理思想探析" (8) : 2007

      56 張秦, "呂振羽《簡明中國通史》研究" 陝西師範大學 2014

      57 馮曉蔚, "劉少奇秘書呂振羽的史學革命" (4) : 2010

      58 李興年, "中國馬克思主義史家的民族史觀 —以呂振羽,翦伯贊,范文瀾和郭沫若爲代表" 安徽大學 2010

      59 王學典, "中國馬克思主義史學研究中的一部“掘井”之作—《呂振羽和他的曆史學研究》讀後" (4) : 1993

      60 呂振羽, "中國民族簡史" 光華書店 1948

      61 王文光, "中國民族發展史" 民族出版社 2005

      62 周競紅, "“民族”與“階級”:馬克思主義經典作家之論及當代意義" (6) : 2017

      63 Dirlik, Arif, "Culture and History in Postrevolutionary China : The Perspective of Global Modernity" Columbia Univ Pr 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼