Daesan Li Sang Jeong(1711∼1781) was a crucial member of the Yeongnam - Toegae- school. But his philosophy for four-seven debate can be said to succeed to the Kyeongki - Toegae - school. He insisted the theory of Liju-Kija(理主氣資) in Li and Ki ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99755995
2013
-
100
KCI등재
학술저널
169-199(31쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Daesan Li Sang Jeong(1711∼1781) was a crucial member of the Yeongnam - Toegae- school. But his philosophy for four-seven debate can be said to succeed to the Kyeongki - Toegae - school. He insisted the theory of Liju-Kija(理主氣資) in Li and Ki ...
Daesan Li Sang Jeong(1711∼1781) was a crucial member of the Yeongnam - Toegae- school. But his philosophy for four-seven debate can be said to succeed to the Kyeongki - Toegae - school. He insisted the theory of Liju-Kija(理主氣資) in Li and Ki relation. It means Li(理) is not only a driver or controller but also a producer for Ki(氣) and Ki(氣) is not only a assistance or supplement but also a son for Li(理). He expanded the theory of Liju-Kija(理主氣資) to the theory of Honlun(渾淪) and Bungae(分開) that is for four-seven debate. Honlun(渾淪) means all human feelings(especially four and seven) is the same on account of the principles of Liju (理主). It means that even seven come from Liju(理主). Bungae(分開) means there are two kind of feelings in Honlun(渾淪), that is Lival(理發) and Kival(氣發) for example four and seven. Lival(理發), for example four, is a feeling that springs up rightly from the reaction of Liju(理主). On the other hand, Kival(氣發), for example seven, is a feeling that private desire of body reacts from the reaction of Liju(理主). Private desire of body comes from Ki(氣) and Ki(氣) comes from Li(理) which reacts as a driver or producer. So we can say even private desire of body comes from Li(理). Therefore, we can conclude that Kival(氣發) can be the same feeling with Lival(理發) in the sense of its origin. The theory of Honlun(渾淪) and Bungae(分開) can solve the problem of four-seven debate.
특집 기획 : 동아시아 전환기 지식인의 고뇌와 성찰 ; 자강기신구학체용론(自强期新舊學體用論)의 문명론(文明論)과 주체인식에 관한 연구
특집 기획 : 동아시아 전환기 지식인의 고뇌와 성찰 ; 북송시기 지식인의 고뇌와 새로운 세계관의 모색 -북송 유자들의 『노자』 제1장의 이해를 중심으로 한 有無觀의 고찰-
특집 기획 : 동아시아 전환기 지식인의 고뇌와 성찰 ; 서촌무수(西村茂樹)의 『일본도덕론』 연구
이충익(李忠翊)의 “가론(假論)” -이탁오 진가론(眞假論), 정제두 가론(假論)과의 비교-