벼 흰잎마름병 포장저항성 검정방법 체계 확립+ = Establishment of the Text Method for Evaluating the Fideld Resistance of Rice Varieties to Rice leaf Blight

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 벼 흰잎마름병 포장저항성 검정방법 체계확립을 위해 25개 품종에 대하여 진성저항성검정, 2차감염검정, 2차전염검정 및 상습지현지검정을 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 공시한 25개 품종에 대한 진성저항성 검정결과 (1)섬진벼등 13개 품종은 HB9011균에 저항성인 품종군으로, (2)풍산벼등 5개 품종이 HB9022균에 저항성인 품종으로, (3)삼강벼 등 2품종은 HB9011, HB9022, HB9033균에 저항성인 품종군으로 (4)운봉벼 등 12개 품종이 접종균 모두에 이병성인 품종군으로 각각 분류되었다. 2. 2차감염검정결과 HB9011균에 대해서는 영덕벼 등 3품종이, HB9022에 대해서는 태백벼 등 3품종이, HB9033에 대해서는 태백벼가 진성저항성 검정 결과와 상이한 반응을 보였다. 3. 25개 품종에 대한 2차전염검정 결과와 2차감염검정 결과는 각 균주에 대해 상관계수가 각각 0.972, 0.894, 0.919로 나타나 거의 일치하는 경향이었다. 4. 진성저항성검정 결과와 상습지검정 결과 사이에는 상관계수가 각 균주에 대해 각각 0.203, 0.460, 0.591로 나타났는데 상습지현지검정 결과는 운봉벼, 추청벼, 영덕벼가 진성저항성 검정시는 이병성 품종군으로 분류되었으나 동일 품종군내에서도 품종간 차이가 많았다. 5. 4가지 검정결과는 발병지수로 나타내기 위해 각 검정방법별로 지수 25를 부여하여 전체합이 100이 되도록 하였다. 발병지수가 15이하이면 포장저항성이 있다고 판정할 수 있는데, 각 검정방법을 통해 나타난 결과를 종합해보면 서해벼, 화진벼, 영덕벼, 풍산벼 등 4품종이 발병지수 15 이하로 나타나 포장저항성 품종으로 선발되었다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

To establish the simple and practical test method of estimating resistance of rice varieties against rice leafblight, trials were made to correlate among the four test methods such as true resistance test,secondaryinfection test, secondary epidemic test and field test. The results obtained through the experiment on 25 ricevarieties and 3 pathogenic isolates designated to HB9O11, HB9022 and HB9033 can be summarized asfollows. 1 .Based on the results of true resistance test, 25 rice varieties can be classified into four groups:1 )Samgang variety group ;resistant to HB9011, 13 varieties, 2)Pungsan variety group ; resistant to HB9011 and HB9022, 5 varieties, 3)Samgang variety group ; resistant to all three isolates, 2 varieties, 4)Unbongvariety group: sensitive to all three isolates, 12 varieties. 2. The responses of rice varieties to isolates showed some discrepancies among on the test methods. These examples were found in 3 varieties including Yeongdeog varieties to HB9011, 3 varieties including Taebaeg variety to HB9022 and Taebaek vaieties to HB9033. 3. Correlation coefficiences between the secondary infection test and the secondary epidemic test for HB9011, HB9022 and HB9033 were 0.972, 0.894 and 0.919, respectively. It suggests that the two methods are not significantly different so that one of the two methods are not significantly different so that one of the two methods can be omitted from resistant test without affecting the result. 4. Between the true resistance test and the field test at the disease common area, there were no significant correlations. Unbong, Chucheong and Yeongdeog varieties are appeared as resistant varieties in the true resistant test, but their responses in the field test were different and appeared as sensitive varieties. 5. The disease index was used to express theresults from four test methods. The disease index was calculated as the sum of each numerical values of theresults from the four test methods by giving the same weights(0 to 25)to each test method. If the disease index for certain variety is less than 15, then the variety is considered to be resistant. 4 varieties such as Seohae, Hwajin, Yeongdeog and Pungsan varieties-disease indices were less than 15 were selected as field resistance varieties.