기업지배구조와 경영성과 변동성과의 관계분석 = Analyzing the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance Variability

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyzes the relationship between corporate governance and stock return variability which is risk part of business performance. In this study 2009-2013 corporate governance data(5 year) of Korea Corporate Governance Service were used.
According to the empirical study results, variability of business performance (absolute stock return and market-adjusted stock return) does not decrease significantly when overall corporate governance index increases. But 4 year results out of 5 year results show that the coefficients of corporate governance present negative signs and 2 year results out of the 4 year results present significant negative signs in coefficients of corporate governance. This indicates that firms with strong corporate governance lead to the decrease of variability of stock return.
Anaysis of the sub indices of corporate governance shows that protection of shareholder’s right, audit and fair distribution of business performance present a significant negative coefficients implying a decrease in variability of stock return.
In summary, based on communication/adjustment theory, firm which has strong corporate governance system shows decrease of variability in stock return through adjusting various ideas and rejecting extreme opinions in board of directors. Also based on agency theory, firm which has strong corporate governance system presents decrease of stock return variability through limiting the power of CEO.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 손평식, "기업지배구조관점에 근거한 R&D 정보의 가치관련성" 한국전문경영인학회 17 (17): 1-25, 2014

2 이관영, "기업지배구조가 주식시장에 미치는 영향: 경기 변동에 따른 차이" 대한경영학회 24 (24): 1979-1997, 2011

3 기업지배구조개선위원회, "기업지배구조 모범규준"

4 Sah, R. K., "The quality of managers in centralized versus decentralized organizations" 106 : 289-295, 1991

5 Jensen, M., "The modern industrial revolutions, exit and the failure of internal control systems" 48 : 831-880, 1993

6 Moscovici, S., "The group as a polarizer of attitudes" 12 : 125-135, 1969

7 Sah, R. K., "The architecture of economic systems: hierarchies and polyarchies" 76 : 716-727, 1986

8 Amihud, Y., "Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers" 12 : 605-617, 1981

9 Adams, R., "Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance" 18 : 1403-1432, 2005

10 OECD, "OECD Principles of Corporate Governance" 2004

11 Kogan, N., "Modification of judgmental style through group interaction" 4 : 165-174, 1966

12 Bertrand, M., "Enjoying the quiet life? Managerial behavior following antitakeover legislation" 111 : 1043-1075, 2003

13 Koerniadi, H., "Corporate governance and the variability of stock returns: Evidence from New Zealand companies, working paper" AUT University 2010

14 Nguyen, P., "Corporate Governance and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Japanese Firms" 19 : 278-297, 2011

15 Bebchuk, L. A., "CEO centrality" National Bureau of Economic Research 2008

16 Cheng, S., "Board size and the variability of corporate performance" 87 : 157-176, 2008

17 Lipton, M., "A modest proposal for improved corporate governance" 48 : 59-77, 1992