RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      글로벌 패권경쟁과 미국의 신외교정책 = Global Hegemonic Competition and New U.S. Foreign Policy

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      One of the distinct trends in the recent international order is the rise of the great power politics, commonly referred to as the ‘return of geopolitics.’ The West was relieved at the end of the Cold War, but since then, revisionist countries such as China, Russia, and Iran have rebelled against the U.S.-led international order. These countries have something in common that they attempt to defy the current U.S.-led international order. The rivalry between these countries and the United States is developing into a U.S.-China and U.S.-Russia hegemonic competition. Behind the return of geopolitics lies politics of identity between the great powers. ‘Identity politics’ means a dynamic that determines the degree of engagement and exclusion that exists between members of different groups. The ongoing strategic competition among the superpowers is largely based on this politics of identity. With the election of Joe Biden as the next U.S. president, the global hegemonic competition has taken on a new aspect. As the key tenets of overall foreign policy, Biden emphasizes the restoration of U.S. global leadership. This change is based on the self-reflection that U.S. leadership has weakened as the Trump administration has pushed for foreign policies that put U.S. national interests first under the banner of ‘America First.’ Recently, the U.S. policy for China, on the premise that the essence of U.S.-China relations is strategic competition, has focused on preventing China from further weakening the free and open rule-based international order. The conflict between the U.S. and China and Russia is a matter of fundamental values, suggesting that it is not of a nature that can be resolved by easy compromise. Above all, how hegemonic competition will unfold in the future depends on how quickly and firmly the U.S. global leadership will be reestablished. The U.S. strategy for dealing with the hegemonic competition among great powers is to respond by networking alliances and allies. South Korea should try to diversify its security and economic portfolio to spread the risks of competition for hegemony among great powers.
      번역하기

      One of the distinct trends in the recent international order is the rise of the great power politics, commonly referred to as the ‘return of geopolitics.’ The West was relieved at the end of the Cold War, but since then, revisionist countries such...

      One of the distinct trends in the recent international order is the rise of the great power politics, commonly referred to as the ‘return of geopolitics.’ The West was relieved at the end of the Cold War, but since then, revisionist countries such as China, Russia, and Iran have rebelled against the U.S.-led international order. These countries have something in common that they attempt to defy the current U.S.-led international order. The rivalry between these countries and the United States is developing into a U.S.-China and U.S.-Russia hegemonic competition. Behind the return of geopolitics lies politics of identity between the great powers. ‘Identity politics’ means a dynamic that determines the degree of engagement and exclusion that exists between members of different groups. The ongoing strategic competition among the superpowers is largely based on this politics of identity. With the election of Joe Biden as the next U.S. president, the global hegemonic competition has taken on a new aspect. As the key tenets of overall foreign policy, Biden emphasizes the restoration of U.S. global leadership. This change is based on the self-reflection that U.S. leadership has weakened as the Trump administration has pushed for foreign policies that put U.S. national interests first under the banner of ‘America First.’ Recently, the U.S. policy for China, on the premise that the essence of U.S.-China relations is strategic competition, has focused on preventing China from further weakening the free and open rule-based international order. The conflict between the U.S. and China and Russia is a matter of fundamental values, suggesting that it is not of a nature that can be resolved by easy compromise. Above all, how hegemonic competition will unfold in the future depends on how quickly and firmly the U.S. global leadership will be reestablished. The U.S. strategy for dealing with the hegemonic competition among great powers is to respond by networking alliances and allies. South Korea should try to diversify its security and economic portfolio to spread the risks of competition for hegemony among great powers.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼