RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      首都圈 産業立地規制에 關한 硏究 : 工場建築總量制를 中心으로 = (A) Study on the Total Amount of Regulation of the Industrial Location in the Capital Region

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8173614

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Mostly for choice an industrial location in the market economy, Companies prefer to the optimum location which can maximmize the investment yield and, have the more riskless charge in the range of the purchasable information. therefore, they willing to locate the dense districts which already have market, employee and infrastructure, this is a natural appearance. because they can expect economies of concentration.
      The Total Amount of Regulation of the Industrial Location is carried into practice to decentralize population in Capital region by MOCT(Ministry of Construction and Transportation) since 1994. this permitted factory construction within each building quantity, which was decided annually by An administrative district. but this regulation features no effects, since have mistakes of the issue of deconcentration, no reasonableness to itself, regional inequity in the Capital region and so on.
      This study focuses upon the Total Amount of Regulation of the Industrial Location in Capital region. the purpose of this paper is to find a kind of objective logic by surveying the conditions. of the damaged companies by this regulation.
      For this survey, most of the response companies were investigated to be small or middle scale, and have been managed for the many years, therefore, they are difficult to relocate their factories.
      when they failed to locate their factory by the above regulation, only 2% were responsed to considering relocation. and then, if they are aided sufficiently by the central government, 22% were to think about that. these result find that the policy direction for the purpose of developing the local manufacturing firms are not practical. ; most of firms were deciding to apply for destruction permission in the future, so this system have only the temporal effect.
      To conclude, the company can not cope with market conditions under the Total Amount of Regulation and then, this system can not help expanding the local industrial capacity.
      The total amount of regulation system has five basic problems as follows;
      first, the policy direction, that is, the decentralization in capital region ought to be reconsidered in basic side.
      second, the population centralization is not due to the industrial location, because the structure of the manufacturing industry is much different from in 1960s.
      third, it is impractical that the regulation of the Industrial location can make moving factories to the local area. that is already proved by survey findings.
      forth, this system is a kind of duplicate, excess regulation. In addition to decentralization policy, the factory construction by size and type of industry in capital region is restricted by the individual law.
      fifth, this regulation is a sort of distribution system. so this didn't reflect well the real demand of industrial location and the needs of local government.
      In point of fact, decentralization policy to itself don't have a rational basis, and the total amount of regulation don't give rise to both population dispersion and local development. so that regulations of industrial location or construction will consider more the side of the environmental protection or the pollution issue than the concentration in capital area.
      the best alternative proposal is that the total amount of regulation is abolished completely. but the provinces will resist this proposal. so that will be considered for long and a thorough reorganization will be needed.
      번역하기

      Mostly for choice an industrial location in the market economy, Companies prefer to the optimum location which can maximmize the investment yield and, have the more riskless charge in the range of the purchasable information. therefore, they willing t...

      Mostly for choice an industrial location in the market economy, Companies prefer to the optimum location which can maximmize the investment yield and, have the more riskless charge in the range of the purchasable information. therefore, they willing to locate the dense districts which already have market, employee and infrastructure, this is a natural appearance. because they can expect economies of concentration.
      The Total Amount of Regulation of the Industrial Location is carried into practice to decentralize population in Capital region by MOCT(Ministry of Construction and Transportation) since 1994. this permitted factory construction within each building quantity, which was decided annually by An administrative district. but this regulation features no effects, since have mistakes of the issue of deconcentration, no reasonableness to itself, regional inequity in the Capital region and so on.
      This study focuses upon the Total Amount of Regulation of the Industrial Location in Capital region. the purpose of this paper is to find a kind of objective logic by surveying the conditions. of the damaged companies by this regulation.
      For this survey, most of the response companies were investigated to be small or middle scale, and have been managed for the many years, therefore, they are difficult to relocate their factories.
      when they failed to locate their factory by the above regulation, only 2% were responsed to considering relocation. and then, if they are aided sufficiently by the central government, 22% were to think about that. these result find that the policy direction for the purpose of developing the local manufacturing firms are not practical. ; most of firms were deciding to apply for destruction permission in the future, so this system have only the temporal effect.
      To conclude, the company can not cope with market conditions under the Total Amount of Regulation and then, this system can not help expanding the local industrial capacity.
      The total amount of regulation system has five basic problems as follows;
      first, the policy direction, that is, the decentralization in capital region ought to be reconsidered in basic side.
      second, the population centralization is not due to the industrial location, because the structure of the manufacturing industry is much different from in 1960s.
      third, it is impractical that the regulation of the Industrial location can make moving factories to the local area. that is already proved by survey findings.
      forth, this system is a kind of duplicate, excess regulation. In addition to decentralization policy, the factory construction by size and type of industry in capital region is restricted by the individual law.
      fifth, this regulation is a sort of distribution system. so this didn't reflect well the real demand of industrial location and the needs of local government.
      In point of fact, decentralization policy to itself don't have a rational basis, and the total amount of regulation don't give rise to both population dispersion and local development. so that regulations of industrial location or construction will consider more the side of the environmental protection or the pollution issue than the concentration in capital area.
      the best alternative proposal is that the total amount of regulation is abolished completely. but the provinces will resist this proposal. so that will be considered for long and a thorough reorganization will be needed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 第1章 序論 = 1
      • 第1節. 硏究의 背景 및 目的 = 1
      • 第2節. 硏究의 範圍 = 5
      • 第3節. 硏究의 方法 및 흐름 = 6
      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 第1章 序論 = 1
      • 第1節. 硏究의 背景 및 目的 = 1
      • 第2節. 硏究의 範圍 = 5
      • 第3節. 硏究의 方法 및 흐름 = 6
      • 第2章 理論的 背景 및 先行硏究의 檢討 = 9
      • 第1節 産業立地理論의 檢討 = 9
      • 1. 입지론과 부동산학의 연구대상 = 9
      • 2. 산업입지이론 = 13
      • 第2節 首都圈 産業立地規制에 關한 先行硏究 = 21
      • 1. 수도권 문제를 보는 시각 = 21
      • 2. 수도권 산업입지규제에 관한 선행연구 = 32
      • 第3章 首都圈 産業立地規制의 現況 = 34
      • 第1節 首都圈政策과 産業立地規制 = 34
      • 1. 수도권의 인구 및 산업경제구조 = 34
      • 2. 수도권정책의 전개과정 = 39
      • 3. 수도권정책과 산업입지규제와의 관계 = 43
      • 第2節 首都圈 産業立地規制의 現況 = 44
      • 1. 수도권정비계획법상 총량범위내 여부 = 45
      • 2. 공업배치및공장설립에 관한법률상 공장설립 가능 여부 = 46
      • 3. 국토이용관리법상 공장설립 가능 여부 = 52
      • 4. 국토이용관리법상 용도지역 변경 가능 여부 = 57
      • 第4章 工場建築總量制의 現況 = 59
      • 第1節 工場建築總量制의 導入背景 = 59
      • 第2節 工場建築總量制의 運營實態 = 62
      • 1. 공장건축총량제의 개요 = 62
      • 2. 공장건축총량의 설정 및 집행 = 64
      • 3. 경기도 공장총량의 운영실태 = 69
      • 第3節 工場建築總量制로 인한 被害企業 分析 = 74
      • 1. 조사 대상 및 방법 = 74
      • 2. 조사 결과 = 74
      • 3. 조사결과의 종합 = 80
      • 第5章 工場建築總量制의 問題點과 改善方案 = 82
      • 第1節 工場建築總量制의 問題點 = 82
      • 1. 수도권 정책의 근본적인 오류 = 84
      • 2. 공장건축총량제의 비과학성 = 89
      • 3. 과잉, 중복규제 = 90
      • 4. 규제의 실효성 미흡 = 92
      • 5. 수도권 내의 균형발전 저해 = 93
      • 6. 운영상의 문제점 = 95
      • 第2節 工場建築總量制의 改善方案 = 95
      • 1. 공장건축총량제의 폐지방안 = 96
      • 2. 공장건축에 대해 과밀부담금 부과방안 = 97
      • 3. 공장건축총량제도 유지시 개선방안 = 99
      • 第3節 總量規制 廢止에 대한 地方의 反對論理 檢討 = 100
      • 第6章 結論 = 104
      • 第1節 要約 및 結論 = 104
      • 第2節 政策建議 및 向後 硏究課題 = 107
      • 參考文獻 = 109
      • ABSTRACT = 114
      • 附錄 = 117
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼