RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      評価的意味を表わす日本語複合動詞の用法と文脈

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100163231

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is not that rare case that students have difficulty using Japanese compound verbs even when they know the meaning of them. This is closely related to the situation in which they lack the knowledge about the prototypical context. To support the students in this respect, it is necessary to be able to analyze the general context in which Japanese compound verbs are used. Analyzing the context systematically requires a methodology which enables it. This paper focused on the usage of the Japanese compound verbs involved with evaluative meaning and tested whether it"s possible to analyze the context in terms of the evaluative aspects. To do that, appraisal theory proposed by Martin&White (2005) was adopted. The theory was developed in the context of systemic functional grammar. One of Japanese compound verbs, kazaritateru, was analyzed as a case study. Through the analysis, it was revealed that the evaluative meaning of kazaritateru is closely related to the context in terms of its evaluative aspects. Chapter 2 and 3 showed that the distribution of the expressions involved with attitude system is co-related with its usage. Also, It was observed that the percentage of the expressions involved with engagement system is different depending on the usage of kazaritateru. This reflects that the characteristics of the text could be different when its expected readers are different. In chapter 4, it was briefly examined how this approach could be applied to the education of Japanese compound verbs which have evaluative meaning. This paper suggested that the methodology adopted here could be used to the education of Japanese compound verbs.
      번역하기

      It is not that rare case that students have difficulty using Japanese compound verbs even when they know the meaning of them. This is closely related to the situation in which they lack the knowledge about the prototypical context. To support the stud...

      It is not that rare case that students have difficulty using Japanese compound verbs even when they know the meaning of them. This is closely related to the situation in which they lack the knowledge about the prototypical context. To support the students in this respect, it is necessary to be able to analyze the general context in which Japanese compound verbs are used. Analyzing the context systematically requires a methodology which enables it. This paper focused on the usage of the Japanese compound verbs involved with evaluative meaning and tested whether it"s possible to analyze the context in terms of the evaluative aspects. To do that, appraisal theory proposed by Martin&White (2005) was adopted. The theory was developed in the context of systemic functional grammar. One of Japanese compound verbs, kazaritateru, was analyzed as a case study. Through the analysis, it was revealed that the evaluative meaning of kazaritateru is closely related to the context in terms of its evaluative aspects. Chapter 2 and 3 showed that the distribution of the expressions involved with attitude system is co-related with its usage. Also, It was observed that the percentage of the expressions involved with engagement system is different depending on the usage of kazaritateru. This reflects that the characteristics of the text could be different when its expected readers are different. In chapter 4, it was briefly examined how this approach could be applied to the education of Japanese compound verbs which have evaluative meaning. This paper suggested that the methodology adopted here could be used to the education of Japanese compound verbs.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 問題の所在
      • 2. 分析の?象と理論的?組み
      • 3. 分析
      • 4. ディスカッション
      • Abstract
      • 1. 問題の所在
      • 2. 分析の?象と理論的?組み
      • 3. 分析
      • 4. ディスカッション
      • 5. 日本語複合動詞の?育との?連性
      • 6. まとめ
      • ?考文?
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 林 宅男, "談話分析のアプローチ" 研究社 2011

      2 籾山洋介, "認知言語学論考 No.9" ひつじ書房 1-37, 2010

      3 小泉 保, "言語研究における機能主義" くろしお出版 2000

      4 高見健一, "現代言語学の潮流" 勁草書房 80-92, 2003

      5 岡本雅史, "比喩表現における意味論的主観性と語用論的主観性" 2 : 9-16, 2007

      6 松田文子, "日本語複合動詞の習得研究" ひつじ書房 2004

      7 森田良行, "動詞・形容詞・副詞の辞典" 東京党出版 2008

      8 龍城正明, "ことばは生きている─選択体系機能言語学序説" くろしお出版 2006

      9 Langacker, Ronald W., "Usage-based models of language" CSLI Publications 1-63, 2000

      10 Swain, Elizabeth, "Thresholds and Potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics" EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste 291-317, 2010

      1 林 宅男, "談話分析のアプローチ" 研究社 2011

      2 籾山洋介, "認知言語学論考 No.9" ひつじ書房 1-37, 2010

      3 小泉 保, "言語研究における機能主義" くろしお出版 2000

      4 高見健一, "現代言語学の潮流" 勁草書房 80-92, 2003

      5 岡本雅史, "比喩表現における意味論的主観性と語用論的主観性" 2 : 9-16, 2007

      6 松田文子, "日本語複合動詞の習得研究" ひつじ書房 2004

      7 森田良行, "動詞・形容詞・副詞の辞典" 東京党出版 2008

      8 龍城正明, "ことばは生きている─選択体系機能言語学序説" くろしお出版 2006

      9 Langacker, Ronald W., "Usage-based models of language" CSLI Publications 1-63, 2000

      10 Swain, Elizabeth, "Thresholds and Potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics" EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste 291-317, 2010

      11 Martin, J.R., "The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English" Palgrave Macmillan 2005

      12 White, P. R. R., "Beyond Modality and Hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance" 1-25, 2003

      13 Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" Edward Arnold 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.35 0.35 0.29
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.27 0.24 0.556 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼