Lower Income Housing Assistance Program (Section 8) : nationwide evaluation of the existing housing program : technical supplement

목차 (Table of Contents)

• CONTENTS
• Introduction = 1
• SAMPLE SELECTION OF AGENCIES, HOUSEHOLDS, AND LANDLORDS = 3
• COLLECTION OF THE CORE DATA = 6
• STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK AND ESTIMATION = 11
• Glossary = 17
• Tables : Section Ⅰ. CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICIPANTS = 25
• Table Ⅰ.1, Selected Demographic Characteristics = 27
• Table Ⅰ.2, Age by Race by Household Size = 29
• Table Ⅰ.3, Special Program Groups = 31
• Table Ⅰ.4, Income Characteristics = 33
• Table Ⅰ.5, Income Characteristics of Recipients = 35
• Table Ⅰ.6, Income Characteristics of Non-Recipients = 37
• Table Ⅰ.7, Income Characteristics of Active Certificate Holders = 39
• Table Ⅰ.8, Movers and Stayers, Selected Demographic Characteristics = 41
• Table Ⅰ.9, Movers and Stayers, Age by Ethnic Group by Household Size = 43
• Table Ⅰ.10, Movers and Stayers, Income Characteristics = 45
• Table Ⅰ.11, Selected Characteristics of Landlords = 47
• Tables : Section Ⅱ. SEARCH AND MOBILITY = 49
• Table Ⅱ.1, Percent of Recipients Who Moved = 51
• Table Ⅱ.2, Reasons Given by Households for Moving to a Different Unit = 53
• Table Ⅱ.3, Reasons Given by Households for Staying in the Same Unit = 55
• Table Ⅱ.4, Percent of Movers Who Gave Program-Induced Reasons = 57
• Table Ⅱ.5, Percent of Stayers Who Said That They Did Not Move Because of Problems Associated With Changing Units = 59
• Table Ⅱ.6, Percent of Movers Who Disliked Previous Neighborhood = 61
• Table Ⅱ.7, Percent of Recipient Movers and Stayers Who Wanted to Move = 63
• Table Ⅱ.8, Percent of Non-Recipients Who Wanted to Move and Percent of Non-Recipients Who Searched = 65
• Table Ⅱ.9, Units Examined and Landlord Refusals Encountered by Searchers = 67
• Table Ⅱ.10, Search Assistance Provided by Agencies = 69
• Table Ⅱ.11, Search Assistance Received by Recipients = 71
• Table Ⅱ.12, Search Assistance Received by Movers = 73
• Table Ⅱ.13, Search Assistance Received by Non-Recipient Households = 75
• Table Ⅱ.14, Search Assistance Received by Non-Recipient Households Who Wanted to Move = 77
• Table Ⅱ.15, Household Problems in Searching for a Unit = 79
• Table Ⅱ.16, Problems in Finding a Unit Which Were Encountered by Non-Recipients Who Did Not Search = 81
• Tables : Section Ⅲ. SECTION 8 PROGRAM RESULTS
• Table Ⅲ.1, Average Housing Expenditures Prior to and Under the Section 8 Program (Recipient Households) = 85
• Table Ⅲ.2, Pre-Program and Program Expenditures for Recipient Movers and Stayers = 87
• Table Ⅲ.3, Housing Expenditures as Proportion of Income for Recipients and Non-Recipients = 89
• Table Ⅲ.4, Housing Expenditures as Proportion of Income for Recipient Movers and Stayers = 91
• Table Ⅲ.5, Distribution of Households According to Their Gross Rent Relative to the FMR = 93
• Table Ⅲ.6a, Difference Between Monthly Utility Expenditures and Allowances = 95
• Table Ⅲ.6b, Percentage Distribution of All Households Who Pay for Part or All of Their Utilities = 95
• Table Ⅲ.7, Quantitative Changes in Housing Consumption for Recipients with Pre-program Rental Expenditures = 97
• Table Ⅲ.8, Perceived Changes in Housing Consumption for Recipients with Pre-program Rental Expenditures = 99
• Table Ⅲ.9, Changes in Housing Consumption for Recipient Movers and Stayers by Demographic Group = 101
• Table Ⅲ.10, Distribution of Movers and Stayers by Type of Residential Structures = 103
• Table Ⅲ.11, Landlord Reasons for Rent Change = 105
• Table Ⅲ.12, Landlord Perception of Section 8 Tenants Relative to Other Tenants = 107
• Table Ⅲ.13a, Agency Provision of Household Inspection Checklist = 109
• Table Ⅲ.13b, Household Use of the Inspection Checklist = 109
• Table Ⅲ.14, Agencies Involved in Management Functions = 111
• Table Ⅲ.15, Landlord Views of the Program = 113
• APPENDICES
• A. SELECTED TABULATIONS FOR THIRTY-TWO HOUSEHOLD GROUPS = 115
• Section Ⅰ: CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICIPANTS = 117
• Ⅰ.A.1 Mean Annual Family Income ($) = 119
• Ⅰ.A.2 Proportion With Very Low Income = 121
• Ⅰ.A.3 Proportion Receiving Wages = 123
• Ⅰ.A.4 Proportion Receiving Benefits = 125
• Ⅰ.A.5 Proportion Receiving Welfare = 127
• Ⅰ.A.6 Proportion Receiving Other Income = 129
• Ⅰ.A.7 Proportion Receiving Wages But Not Benefits or Welfare = 131
• Ⅰ.A.8 Proportion Receiving Benefits or Welfare But Not Wages = 133
• Ⅰ.A.9 Proportion Receiving Wages and Welfare But Not Benefits = 135
• Ⅰ.A.10 Proportion Who Are Minority = 137
• Ⅰ.A.11 Proportion With An Elderly Head or Spouse (62+) = 139
• Ⅰ.A.12 Proportion With Disabled or Handicapped Head or Spouse = 141
• Ⅰ.A.13 Number of Persons in Family = 143
• Ⅰ.A.14 Number of Minors in Family = 145
• Ⅰ.A.15 Proportion With Male Head = 147
• Ⅰ.A.16 Proportion With Husband and Wife Present = 149
• Section Ⅱ : SEARCH AND MOBILITY = 151
• Ⅱ.A.1 Proportion Who Stayed in Pre-Section 8 Unit = 153
• Ⅱ.A.2 Proportion Who Searched for a Unit = 155
• Ⅱ.A.3 Proportion Who Wanted to Move = 157
• Ⅱ.A.4 Proportion of Movers Who Gave Program-Induced Reasons for Moving = 159
• Ⅱ.A.5 Proportion of Stayers Who Said That They Did Not Move Because of Problems Associated With Changing Units = 161
• Ⅱ.A.6 Proportion of Movers Who Said That The Previous Neighborhood Was Unsuitable = 163
• Ⅱ.A.7 Proportion Who Said Agency Gave Enough or More Than Enough Help in Looking for a Unit = 65
• Ⅱ.A.8 Proportion Who Said That They Made a Better Choice of Unit Because of Agency Help = 167
• Ⅱ.A.9 Proportion Who Received List of Available Units of Landlords from Agency = 169
• Ⅱ.A.10 Proportion Who Received Inspection Checklist from Agency = 171
• Ⅱ.A.11 Households Who Looked at Places on the Availability List as a Proportion of House-holds Who Received the Lists = 173
• Ⅱ.A.12 Households Whose Section 8 Unit Was on the List as a Proportion of Households Who Used the Availability List = 175
• Ⅱ.A.13 Proportion of Movers Who Found New Unit Through the Agency = 177
• Ⅱ.A.14 Households Who Used Inspection Checklist as a Proportion of Households Who Received a Checklist = 179
• Ⅱ.A.15 Proportion Who Said "Finding An Available Unit" Was a Major Problem = 181
• Ⅱ.A.16 Proportion Who Said "Finding a Unit Within the Allowable Rent" Was a Major Problem = 183
• Ⅱ.A.17 Proportion Who Said "Finding a Unit With Enough Bedrooms" Was a Maj or Problem = 185
• Ⅱ.A.18 Proportion Who Said "Getting Transportation to Search for a Unit" Was a Major Problem = 187
• Ⅱ.A.19 Proportion Who Said "Explaining to Landlords How the Program Works" Was a Major Problem = 189
• Ⅱ.A.20 Proportion Who Said "Finding a Unit That Would Pass Section 8 Inspection" Was a Major Problem = 191
• Ⅱ.A.21 Households Who Wanted to Move as a Proportion of Households Who Searched = 193
• Ⅱ.A.22 Households Who Wanted to Move as a Proportion of Households Who Did Not Search = 195
• Section Ⅲ : PROGRAM RESULTS = 197
• Ⅲ.A.1 Mean Monthly Pre-Section 8 Expenditures for All Recipients ($) = 199
• Ⅲ.A.2 Mean Monthly Pre-Section 8 Expenditures for All Recipients With Positive Pre-Section 8 Expenditures ($) = 201
• Ⅲ.A.3 Mean Monthly Expenditures Under Section 8 Program = 203
• Ⅲ.A.4 Mean Monthly Housing Costs to Household Under Section 8 Program = 205
• Ⅲ.A.5 Mean Monthly Subsidy to Household ($) = 207
• Ⅲ.A.6 Mean Ratio : Pre-program Expenditures as Proportion of Income = 209
• Ⅲ.A.7 Mean Ratio : Program Costs to Household as Proportion of Income = 211
• Ⅲ.A.8 Mean Ratio : Monthly Gross Rent as Proportion of FMR = 213
• Ⅲ.A.9 Change in Number of Bedrooms = 215
• Ⅲ.A,10 Proportion Requiring Repairs to Qualify for the Program = 217
• Ⅲ.A.11 Proportion Who Said That Their Housing Conditions Were Better in Their Section 8 Unit Than in Their Pre-Section 8 Unit = 219
• Ⅲ.A.12 Proportion Who Were More Satisfied With Their Section 8 Unit Than With Their Pre-Section 8 Unit = 221
• B. SAMPLE SELECTION AND STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK = 223