RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기업의 지속가능경영에 대한 성과관리: 균형성과표(BSC)에서 지속가능 균형성과표(SBSC)로 = Performance Management of Corporate Sustainability: From Balanced Scorecard (BSC) to Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109763516

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With the rapid industrialization of the 1960s leading to severe environmental issues, discussions on sustainability began to emerge in the 1970s, primarily led by the United Nations (UN). As a result, businesses expanded their focus beyond financial performance to include environmental and social issues, highlighting the need for a performance management system for sustainable management. To address this need, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) was linked to sustainable management. This study focuses on the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) and establishes the following research objectives: (1) to compare and analyze the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC), (2) to identify the types of Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and determine relevant measurement indicators, and (3) to present considerations and processes for successfully implementing the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard in organizations. The findings of this study are as follows.
      First, the similarities and differences between the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard and the traditional Balanced Scorecard were identified. The commonalities include the four perspectives (financial, customer, internal processes, and learning & growth) and the development of a strategy map. However, the key differences lie in the addition of social and environmental perspectives, as well as the expanded scope of stakeholders beyond customers to emphasize stronger relationships with both internal and external stakeholders. Second, the study categorized SBSC into two types: the SBSC-4 model, which integrates social and environmental factors into the existing four BSC perspectives, and the SBSC-5 model, which treats social and environmental factors as independent perspectives. The differences between these two models were discussed in detail. Third, the conditions necessary for successfully applying the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard in organizations and the steps required for its implementation were outlined. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications of this study, as well as its limitations, were discussed.
      번역하기

      With the rapid industrialization of the 1960s leading to severe environmental issues, discussions on sustainability began to emerge in the 1970s, primarily led by the United Nations (UN). As a result, businesses expanded their focus beyond financial p...

      With the rapid industrialization of the 1960s leading to severe environmental issues, discussions on sustainability began to emerge in the 1970s, primarily led by the United Nations (UN). As a result, businesses expanded their focus beyond financial performance to include environmental and social issues, highlighting the need for a performance management system for sustainable management. To address this need, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) was linked to sustainable management. This study focuses on the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) and establishes the following research objectives: (1) to compare and analyze the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC), (2) to identify the types of Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and determine relevant measurement indicators, and (3) to present considerations and processes for successfully implementing the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard in organizations. The findings of this study are as follows.
      First, the similarities and differences between the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard and the traditional Balanced Scorecard were identified. The commonalities include the four perspectives (financial, customer, internal processes, and learning & growth) and the development of a strategy map. However, the key differences lie in the addition of social and environmental perspectives, as well as the expanded scope of stakeholders beyond customers to emphasize stronger relationships with both internal and external stakeholders. Second, the study categorized SBSC into two types: the SBSC-4 model, which integrates social and environmental factors into the existing four BSC perspectives, and the SBSC-5 model, which treats social and environmental factors as independent perspectives. The differences between these two models were discussed in detail. Third, the conditions necessary for successfully applying the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard in organizations and the steps required for its implementation were outlined. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications of this study, as well as its limitations, were discussed.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼